Electrostatics is a branch of physics that studies electric charges at rest.
Since classical physics, it has been known that some materials, such as amber, attract lightweight particles after rubbing. The Greek word for amber, , or ', was thus the source of the word 'electricity'. Electrostatic phenomena arise from the forces that electric charges exert on each other. Such forces are described by Coulomb's law.
Even though electrostatically induced forces seem to be rather weak, some electrostatic forces such as the one between an electron and a proton, that together make up a hydrogen atom, is about 36 orders of magnitude stronger than the gravitational force acting between them.
There are many examples of electrostatic phenomena, from those as simple as the attraction of the plastic wrap to one's hand after it is removed from a package to the apparently spontaneous explosion of grain silos, the damage of electronic components during manufacturing, and photocopier & laser printer operation. Electrostatics involves the buildup of charge on the surface of objects due to contact with other surfaces. Although charge exchange happens whenever any two surfaces contact and separate, the effects of charge exchange are usually only noticed when at least one of the surfaces has a high resistance to electrical flow. This is because the charges that transfer are trapped there for a time long enough for their effects to be observed. These charges then remain on the object until they either bleed off to ground or are quickly neutralized by a discharge: e.g., the familiar phenomenon of a static "shock" is caused by the neutralization of charge built up in the body from contact with insulated surfaces.

Coulomb's law

Coulomb's law states that: 'The magnitude of the electrostatic force of attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.' The force is along the straight line joining them. If the two charges have the same sign, the electrostatic force between them is repulsive; if they have different signs, the force between them is attractive. If $r$ is the distance (in meters) between two charges, then the force (in newtons) between two point charges $q$ and $Q$ (in coulombs) is: :$F\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash frac=\; k\_0\backslash frac\backslash ,\; ,$ where ε_{0} is the vacuum permittivity, or permittivity of free space:
:$\backslash varepsilon\_0\; \backslash approx\; 8.854\backslash \; 187\backslash \; 817\; \backslash times\; 10^\; \backslash ;\backslash ;\; \backslash mathrm.$
The SI units of ε_{0} are equivalently A^{2}s^{4} kg^{−1}m^{−3} or C^{2}N^{−1}m^{−2} or F m^{−1}. Coulomb's constant is:
:$k\_0\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash approx\; 8.987\backslash \; 551\backslash \; 792\; \backslash times\; 10^9\; \backslash ;\backslash ;\; \backslash mathrm^.$
A single proton has a charge of ''e'', and the electron has a charge of −''e'', where,
:$e\; \backslash approx\; 1.602\backslash \; 176\backslash \; 565\; \backslash times\; 10^\backslash ;\backslash ;\; \backslash mathrm.$
These physical constants (ε_{0}, k_{0}, e) are currently defined so that ε_{0} and k_{0} are exactly defined, and ''e'' is a measured quantity.

Electric field

The electric field, $\backslash vec$, in units of newtons per coulomb or volts per meter, is a vector field that can be defined everywhere, except at the location of point charges (where it diverges to infinity). It is defined as the electrostatic force $\backslash vec\backslash ,$ in newtons on a hypothetical small test charge at the point due to Coulomb's Law, divided by the magnitude of the charge $q\backslash ,$ in coulombs :$\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash ,$ Electric field lines are useful for visualizing the electric field. Field lines begin on positive charge and terminate on negative charge. They are parallel to the direction of the electric field at each point, and the density of these field lines is a measure of the magnitude of the electric field at any given point. Consider a collection of $N$ particles of charge $Q\_i$, located at points $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ (called ''source points''), the electric field at $\backslash vec\; r$ (called the ''field point'') is: :$\backslash vec(\backslash vec\; r)\; =\backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac\; ,$ where $\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; =\; \backslash vec\; r\; -\; \backslash vec\; r\_i\; ,$ is the displacement vector from a ''source point'' $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ to the ''field point'' $\backslash vec\; r$, and $\backslash widehat\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; =\; \backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; /\; \backslash left\; \backslash |\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; \backslash right\; \backslash |$ is a unit vector that indicates the direction of the field. For a single point charge at the origin, the magnitude of this electric field is $E\; =k\_eQ/\backslash mathcal\; R^2,$ and points away from that charge if it is positive. The fact that the force (and hence the field) can be calculated by summing over all the contributions due to individual source particles is an example of the superposition principle. The electric field produced by a distribution of charges is given by the volume charge density $\backslash rho\; (\backslash vec\; r)$ and can be obtained by converting this sum into a triple integral: :$\backslash vec(\backslash vec\; r)=\; \backslash frac\; \backslash iiint\; \backslash frac\; \backslash rho\; (\backslash vec\; r\; \backslash ,\text{'})\backslash operatorname^3\; r\backslash ,\text{'}$

Gauss' law

Gauss' law states that "the total electric flux through any closed surface in free space of any shape drawn in an electric field is proportional to the total electric charge enclosed by the surface." Mathematically, Gauss's law takes the form of an integral equation: :$\backslash oint\_S\backslash vec\; \backslash cdot\backslash mathrm\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash ,Q\_=\backslash int\_V\backslash cdot\backslash operatorname^3\; r,$ where $\backslash operatorname^3\; r\; =\backslash mathrmx\; \backslash \; \backslash mathrmy\; \backslash \; \backslash mathrmz$ is a volume element. If the charge is distributed over a surface or along a line, replace $\backslash rho\backslash mathrm^3r$ by $\backslash sigma\backslash mathrmA$ or $\backslash lambda\backslash mathrm\backslash ell$. The divergence theorem allows Gauss's Law to be written in differential form: :$\backslash vec\backslash cdot\backslash vec\; =\; .$ where $\backslash vec\; \backslash cdot$ is the divergence operator.

Poisson and Laplace equations

The definition of electrostatic potential, combined with the differential form of Gauss's law (above), provides a relationship between the potential Φ and the charge density ρ: :$^2\; \backslash phi\; =\; -\; .$ This relationship is a form of Poisson's equation. In the absence of unpaired electric charge, the equation becomes Laplace's equation: :$^2\; \backslash phi\; =\; 0,$

Electrostatic approximation

The validity of the electrostatic approximation rests on the assumption that the electric field is irrotational: :$\backslash vec\backslash times\backslash vec\; =\; 0.$ From Faraday's law, this assumption implies the absence or near-absence of time-varying magnetic fields: :$=\; 0.$ In other words, electrostatics does not require the absence of magnetic fields or electric currents. Rather, if magnetic fields or electric currents ''do'' exist, they must not change with time, or in the worst-case, they must change with time only ''very slowly''. In some problems, both electrostatics and magnetostatics may be required for accurate predictions, but the coupling between the two can still be ignored. Electrostatics and magnetostatics can both be seen as Galilean limits for electromagnetism.

Electrostatic potential

As the electric field is irrotational, it is possible to express the electric field as the gradient of a scalar function,$\backslash phi$, called the electrostatic potential (also known as the voltage). An electric field, $E$, points from regions of high electric potential to regions of low electric potential, expressed mathematically as :$\backslash vec\; =\; -\backslash vec\backslash phi.$ The gradient theorem can be used to establish that the electrostatic potential is the amount of work per unit charge required to move a charge from point $a$ to point $b$ with the following line integral: :$-\backslash int\_a^b\; =\; \backslash phi\; (\backslash vec\; b)\; -\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; a).$ From these equations, we see that the electric potential is constant in any region for which the electric field vanishes (such as occurs inside a conducting object).

Electrostatic energy

A single test particle's potential energy, $U\_\backslash mathrm^$, can be calculated from a line integral of the work, $q\_n\backslash vec\; E\backslash cdot\backslash mathrm\; d\backslash vec\backslash ell$. We integrate from a point at infinity, and assume a collection of $N$ particles of charge $Q\_n$, are already situated at the points $\backslash vec\; r\_i$. This potential energy (in Joules) is: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^=q\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; r)=\backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac$ where $\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; =\; \backslash vec\; r\; -\; \backslash vec\; r\_i$ is the distance of each charge $Q\_i$ from the test charge $q$, which situated at the point $\backslash vec\; r$, and $\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; r)$ is the electric potential that would be at $\backslash vec\; r$ if the test charge were not present. If only two charges are present, the potential energy is $k\_eQ\_1Q\_2/r$. The total electric potential energy due a collection of ''N'' charges is calculating by assembling these particles one at a time: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; Q\_j\; \backslash sum\_^\; \backslash frac=\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; Q\_i\backslash phi\_i\; ,$ where the following sum from, ''j = 1'' to ''N'', excludes ''i = j'': :$\backslash phi\_i\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac.$ This electric potential, $\backslash phi\_i$ is what would be measured at $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ if the charge $Q\_i$ were missing. This formula obviously excludes the (infinite) energy that would be required to assemble each point charge from a disperse cloud of charge. The sum over charges can be converted into an integral over charge density using the prescription $\backslash sum\; (\backslash cdots)\; \backslash rightarrow\; \backslash int(\backslash cdots)\backslash rho\backslash mathrm\; d^3r$: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash int\backslash rho(\backslash vec)\backslash phi(\backslash vec)\; \backslash operatorname^3\; r\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash int\; \backslash left|\backslash ^2\; \backslash operatorname^3\; r$, This second expression for electrostatic energy uses the fact that the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential, as well as vector calculus identities in a way that resembles integration by parts. These two integrals for electric field energy seem to indicate two mutually exclusive formulas for electrostatic energy density, namely $\backslash frac\backslash rho\backslash phi$ and $\backslash fracE^2$; they yield equal values for the total electrostatic energy only if both are integrated over all space.

Electrostatic pressure

On a conductor, a surface charge will experience a force in the presence of an electric field. This force is the average of the discontinuous electric field at the surface charge. This average in terms of the field just outside the surface amounts to: :$P\; =\; \backslash frac\; E^2$, This pressure tends to draw the conductor into the field, regardless of the sign of the surface charge.

Triboelectric series

The triboelectric effect is a type of contact electrification in which certain materials become electrically charged when they are brought into contact with a different material and then separated. One of the materials acquires a positive charge, and the other acquires an equal negative charge. The polarity and strength of the charges produced differ according to the materials, surface roughness, temperature, strain, and other properties. Amber, for example, can acquire an electric charge by friction with a material like wool. This property, first recorded by Thales of Miletus, was the first electrical phenomenon investigated by humans. Other examples of materials that can acquire a significant charge when rubbed together include glass rubbed with silk, and hard rubber rubbed with fur.

Electrostatic generators

The presence of surface charge imbalance means that the objects will exhibit attractive or repulsive forces. This surface charge imbalance, which yields static electricity, can be generated by touching two differing surfaces together and then separating them due to the phenomena of contact electrification and the triboelectric effect. Rubbing two nonconductive objects generates a great amount of static electricity. This is not just the result of friction; two nonconductive surfaces can become charged by just being placed one on top of the other. Since most surfaces have a rough texture, it takes longer to achieve charging through contact than through rubbing. Rubbing objects together increases amount of adhesive contact between the two surfaces. Usually insulators, e.g., substances that do not conduct electricity, are good at both generating, and holding, a surface charge. Some examples of these substances are rubber, plastic, glass, and pith. Conductive objects only rarely generate charge imbalance except, for example, when a metal surface is impacted by solid or liquid nonconductors. The charge that is transferred during contact electrification is stored on the surface of each object. Electrostatic generators, devices which produce very high voltage at very low current and used for classroom physics demonstrations, rely on this effect. The presence of electric current does not detract from the electrostatic forces nor from the sparking, from the corona discharge, or other phenomena. Both phenomena can exist simultaneously in the same system. :See also: ''Wimshurst machine'', and ''Van de Graaff generator''.

Charge neutralization

Natural electrostatic phenomena are most familiar as an occasional annoyance in seasons of low humidity, but can be destructive and harmful in some situations (e.g. electronics manufacturing). When working in direct contact with integrated circuit electronics (especially delicate MOSFETs). In the presence of flammable gas, care must be taken to avoid accumulating and suddenly discharging a static charge (see Electrostatic discharge).

Electrostatic induction

Electrostatic induction, discovered by British scientist John Canton in 1753 and Swedish professor Johan Carl Wilcke in 1762 is a redistribution of charges in an object caused by the electric field of a nearby charge. For example, if a positively charged object is brought near an uncharged metal object, the mobile negatively-charged electrons in the metal will be attracted by the external charge, and move to the side of the metal facing it, creating a negative charge on the surface. When the electrons move out of an area they leave a positive charge due to the metal atoms' nuclei, so the side of the metal object facing away from the charge acquires a positive charge. These ''induced charges'' disappear when the external charge is removed. Induction is also responsible for the attraction of light objects, such as balloons, paper scraps and foam packing peanuts to static charges. The surface charges induced in conductive objects exactly cancel external electric fields inside the conductor, so there is no electric field inside a metal object. This is the basis for the electric field shielding action of a Faraday cage. Since the electric field is the gradient of the voltage, electrostatic induction is also responsible for making the electric potential (voltage) constant throughout a conductive object.

Static electricity

Before the year 1832, when Michael Faraday published the results of his experiment on the identity of electricities, physicists thought "static electricity" was somehow different from other electrical charges. Michael Faraday proved that the electricity induced from the magnet, voltaic electricity produced by a battery, and static electricity are all the same. Static electricity is usually caused when certain materials are rubbed against each other, like wool on plastic or the soles of shoes on carpet. The process causes electrons to be pulled from the surface of one material and relocated on the surface of the other material. A static shock occurs when the surface of the second material, negatively charged with electrons, touches a positively charged conductor, or vice versa. Static electricity is commonly used in xerography, air filters, and some coating processes used in manufacturing. Static electricity is a build-up of electric charges on two objects that have become separated from each other. Small electrical components can be damaged by static electricity, and component manufacturers use a number of antistatic devices to avoid this.

Static electricity and chemical industry

When different materials are brought together and then separated, an accumulation of electric charge can occur which leaves one material positively charged while the other becomes negatively charged. The mild shock that you receive when touching a grounded object after walking on carpet is an example of excess electrical charge accumulating in your body from frictional charging between your shoes and the carpet. The resulting charge build-up upon your body can generate a strong electrical discharge. Although experimenting with static electricity may be fun, similar sparks create severe hazards in those industries dealing with flammable substances, where a small electrical spark may ignite explosive mixtures with devastating consequences. A similar charging mechanism can occur within low conductivity fluids flowing through pipelines—a process called flow electrification. Fluids which have low electrical conductivity (below 50 picosiemens per meter), are called accumulators. Fluids having conductivities above 50 pS/m are called non-accumulators. In non-accumulators, charges recombine as fast as they are separated and hence electrostatic charge generation is not significant. In the petrochemical industry, 50 pS/m is the recommended minimum value of electrical conductivity for adequate removal of charge from a fluid. An important concept for insulating fluids is the static relaxation time. This is similar to the time constant (tau) within an RC circuit. For insulating materials, it is the ratio of the static dielectric constant divided by the electrical conductivity of the material. For hydrocarbon fluids, this is sometimes approximated by dividing the number 18 by the electrical conductivity of the fluid. Thus a fluid that has an electrical conductivity of 1 pS/cm (100 pS/m) will have an estimated relaxation time of about 18 seconds. The excess charge within a fluid will be almost completely dissipated after 4 to 5 times the relaxation time, or 90 seconds for the fluid in the above example. Charge generation increases at higher fluid velocities and larger pipe diameters, becoming quite significant in pipes or larger. Static charge generation in these systems is best controlled by limiting fluid velocity. The British standard BS PD CLC/TR 50404:2003 (formerly BS-5958-Part 2) Code of Practice for Control of Undesirable Static Electricity prescribes velocity limits. Because of its large impact on dielectric constant, the recommended velocity for hydrocarbon fluids containing water should be limited to 1 m/s. Bonding and earthing are the usual ways by which charge buildup can be prevented. For fluids with electrical conductivity below 10 pS/m, bonding and earthing are not adequate for charge dissipation, and anti-static additives may be required.

Applicable standards

*BS PD CLC/TR 50404:2003 Code of Practice for Control of Undesirable Static Electricity *NFPA 77 (2007) Recommended Practice on Static Electricity *API RP 2003 (1998) Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and Stray Currents

Electrostatic induction in commercial applications

Electrostatic induction was used in the past to build high-voltage generators known as influence machines. The main component that emerged in these times is the capacitor. Electrostatic induction is also used for electro-mechanic precipitation or projection. In such technologies, charged particles of small sizes are collected or deposited intentionally on surfaces. Applications range from electrostatic precipitator to electrostatic coating and inkjet printing. Recently a new wireless power transfer technology has been based on electrostatic induction between oscillating distant dipoles.

See also

*Electromagnetism *Electronegativity *Electrostatic discharge *Electrostatic separator *Electrostatic voltmeter *Ionic bond *Permittivity and relative permittivity *Quantisation of charge

Footnotes

References

* * * *

Further reading

;Essays *William J. Beaty (1997) "

Humans and sparks: The Cause, Stopping the Pain, and 'Electric People

'" ;Books *William Cecil Dampier (1905) ''The Theory of Experimental Electricity'', Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge physical series). xi, 334 p. illus., diagrs. 23 cm. LCCN 05040419 //r33 *William Thomson Kelvin (1872

Reprint of Papers on Electrostatics and Magnetism By William Thomson Kelvin

Macmillan *Alexander McAulay (1893) ''The Utility of Quaternions in Physics''

Electrostatics—General Problem

Macmillan *Alexander Russell (1904) ''A Treatise on the Theory of Alternating Currents'', Cambridge University Press

Second edition, 1914, volume 1

Second edition, 1916, volume 2

via Internet Archive

External links

*

The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 4: Electrostatics

Man's static jacket sparks alert

. BBC News, 16 September 2005.

Static Electricity and Plastics

. Wolfson Electrostatics News pages *ttp://amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.html Invisible Electrostatic Wall at 3M adhesive tape plantbr>Downloadable electrostatic BEM modules in MATLAB for simple capacitance problems

Introduction_to_Electrostatics:_Point_charges_can_be_treated_as_a_distribution_using_the_[[Dirac_delta_function

.html" style="text-decoration: none;"class="mw-redirect" title="Dirac delta function">Introduction to Electrostatics: Point charges can be treated as a distribution using the Dirac_delta_function">Introduction_to_Electrostatics:_Point_charges_can_be_treated_as_a_distribution_using_the_[[Dirac_delta_function

{{Authority_control [[Category:Electrostatics.html" style="text-decoration: none;"class="mw-redirect" title="Dirac delta function

">Dirac delta function">Introduction to Electrostatics: Point charges can be treated as a distribution using the [[Dirac delta function

{{Authority control [[Category:Electrostatics">

Coulomb's law

Coulomb's law states that: 'The magnitude of the electrostatic force of attraction or repulsion between two point charges is directly proportional to the product of the magnitudes of charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.' The force is along the straight line joining them. If the two charges have the same sign, the electrostatic force between them is repulsive; if they have different signs, the force between them is attractive. If $r$ is the distance (in meters) between two charges, then the force (in newtons) between two point charges $q$ and $Q$ (in coulombs) is: :$F\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash frac=\; k\_0\backslash frac\backslash ,\; ,$ where ε

Electric field

The electric field, $\backslash vec$, in units of newtons per coulomb or volts per meter, is a vector field that can be defined everywhere, except at the location of point charges (where it diverges to infinity). It is defined as the electrostatic force $\backslash vec\backslash ,$ in newtons on a hypothetical small test charge at the point due to Coulomb's Law, divided by the magnitude of the charge $q\backslash ,$ in coulombs :$\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash ,$ Electric field lines are useful for visualizing the electric field. Field lines begin on positive charge and terminate on negative charge. They are parallel to the direction of the electric field at each point, and the density of these field lines is a measure of the magnitude of the electric field at any given point. Consider a collection of $N$ particles of charge $Q\_i$, located at points $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ (called ''source points''), the electric field at $\backslash vec\; r$ (called the ''field point'') is: :$\backslash vec(\backslash vec\; r)\; =\backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac\; ,$ where $\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; =\; \backslash vec\; r\; -\; \backslash vec\; r\_i\; ,$ is the displacement vector from a ''source point'' $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ to the ''field point'' $\backslash vec\; r$, and $\backslash widehat\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; =\; \backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; /\; \backslash left\; \backslash |\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; R\_i\; \backslash right\; \backslash |$ is a unit vector that indicates the direction of the field. For a single point charge at the origin, the magnitude of this electric field is $E\; =k\_eQ/\backslash mathcal\; R^2,$ and points away from that charge if it is positive. The fact that the force (and hence the field) can be calculated by summing over all the contributions due to individual source particles is an example of the superposition principle. The electric field produced by a distribution of charges is given by the volume charge density $\backslash rho\; (\backslash vec\; r)$ and can be obtained by converting this sum into a triple integral: :$\backslash vec(\backslash vec\; r)=\; \backslash frac\; \backslash iiint\; \backslash frac\; \backslash rho\; (\backslash vec\; r\; \backslash ,\text{'})\backslash operatorname^3\; r\backslash ,\text{'}$

Gauss' law

Gauss' law states that "the total electric flux through any closed surface in free space of any shape drawn in an electric field is proportional to the total electric charge enclosed by the surface." Mathematically, Gauss's law takes the form of an integral equation: :$\backslash oint\_S\backslash vec\; \backslash cdot\backslash mathrm\backslash vec\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash ,Q\_=\backslash int\_V\backslash cdot\backslash operatorname^3\; r,$ where $\backslash operatorname^3\; r\; =\backslash mathrmx\; \backslash \; \backslash mathrmy\; \backslash \; \backslash mathrmz$ is a volume element. If the charge is distributed over a surface or along a line, replace $\backslash rho\backslash mathrm^3r$ by $\backslash sigma\backslash mathrmA$ or $\backslash lambda\backslash mathrm\backslash ell$. The divergence theorem allows Gauss's Law to be written in differential form: :$\backslash vec\backslash cdot\backslash vec\; =\; .$ where $\backslash vec\; \backslash cdot$ is the divergence operator.

Poisson and Laplace equations

The definition of electrostatic potential, combined with the differential form of Gauss's law (above), provides a relationship between the potential Φ and the charge density ρ: :$^2\; \backslash phi\; =\; -\; .$ This relationship is a form of Poisson's equation. In the absence of unpaired electric charge, the equation becomes Laplace's equation: :$^2\; \backslash phi\; =\; 0,$

Electrostatic approximation

The validity of the electrostatic approximation rests on the assumption that the electric field is irrotational: :$\backslash vec\backslash times\backslash vec\; =\; 0.$ From Faraday's law, this assumption implies the absence or near-absence of time-varying magnetic fields: :$=\; 0.$ In other words, electrostatics does not require the absence of magnetic fields or electric currents. Rather, if magnetic fields or electric currents ''do'' exist, they must not change with time, or in the worst-case, they must change with time only ''very slowly''. In some problems, both electrostatics and magnetostatics may be required for accurate predictions, but the coupling between the two can still be ignored. Electrostatics and magnetostatics can both be seen as Galilean limits for electromagnetism.

Electrostatic potential

As the electric field is irrotational, it is possible to express the electric field as the gradient of a scalar function,$\backslash phi$, called the electrostatic potential (also known as the voltage). An electric field, $E$, points from regions of high electric potential to regions of low electric potential, expressed mathematically as :$\backslash vec\; =\; -\backslash vec\backslash phi.$ The gradient theorem can be used to establish that the electrostatic potential is the amount of work per unit charge required to move a charge from point $a$ to point $b$ with the following line integral: :$-\backslash int\_a^b\; =\; \backslash phi\; (\backslash vec\; b)\; -\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; a).$ From these equations, we see that the electric potential is constant in any region for which the electric field vanishes (such as occurs inside a conducting object).

Electrostatic energy

A single test particle's potential energy, $U\_\backslash mathrm^$, can be calculated from a line integral of the work, $q\_n\backslash vec\; E\backslash cdot\backslash mathrm\; d\backslash vec\backslash ell$. We integrate from a point at infinity, and assume a collection of $N$ particles of charge $Q\_n$, are already situated at the points $\backslash vec\; r\_i$. This potential energy (in Joules) is: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^=q\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; r)=\backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac$ where $\backslash vec\backslash mathcal\; =\; \backslash vec\; r\; -\; \backslash vec\; r\_i$ is the distance of each charge $Q\_i$ from the test charge $q$, which situated at the point $\backslash vec\; r$, and $\backslash phi(\backslash vec\; r)$ is the electric potential that would be at $\backslash vec\; r$ if the test charge were not present. If only two charges are present, the potential energy is $k\_eQ\_1Q\_2/r$. The total electric potential energy due a collection of ''N'' charges is calculating by assembling these particles one at a time: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; Q\_j\; \backslash sum\_^\; \backslash frac=\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; Q\_i\backslash phi\_i\; ,$ where the following sum from, ''j = 1'' to ''N'', excludes ''i = j'': :$\backslash phi\_i\; =\; \backslash frac\backslash sum\_^N\; \backslash frac.$ This electric potential, $\backslash phi\_i$ is what would be measured at $\backslash vec\; r\_i$ if the charge $Q\_i$ were missing. This formula obviously excludes the (infinite) energy that would be required to assemble each point charge from a disperse cloud of charge. The sum over charges can be converted into an integral over charge density using the prescription $\backslash sum\; (\backslash cdots)\; \backslash rightarrow\; \backslash int(\backslash cdots)\backslash rho\backslash mathrm\; d^3r$: :$U\_\backslash mathrm^\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash int\backslash rho(\backslash vec)\backslash phi(\backslash vec)\; \backslash operatorname^3\; r\; =\; \backslash frac\; \backslash int\; \backslash left|\backslash ^2\; \backslash operatorname^3\; r$, This second expression for electrostatic energy uses the fact that the electric field is the negative gradient of the electric potential, as well as vector calculus identities in a way that resembles integration by parts. These two integrals for electric field energy seem to indicate two mutually exclusive formulas for electrostatic energy density, namely $\backslash frac\backslash rho\backslash phi$ and $\backslash fracE^2$; they yield equal values for the total electrostatic energy only if both are integrated over all space.

Electrostatic pressure

On a conductor, a surface charge will experience a force in the presence of an electric field. This force is the average of the discontinuous electric field at the surface charge. This average in terms of the field just outside the surface amounts to: :$P\; =\; \backslash frac\; E^2$, This pressure tends to draw the conductor into the field, regardless of the sign of the surface charge.

Triboelectric series

The triboelectric effect is a type of contact electrification in which certain materials become electrically charged when they are brought into contact with a different material and then separated. One of the materials acquires a positive charge, and the other acquires an equal negative charge. The polarity and strength of the charges produced differ according to the materials, surface roughness, temperature, strain, and other properties. Amber, for example, can acquire an electric charge by friction with a material like wool. This property, first recorded by Thales of Miletus, was the first electrical phenomenon investigated by humans. Other examples of materials that can acquire a significant charge when rubbed together include glass rubbed with silk, and hard rubber rubbed with fur.

Electrostatic generators

The presence of surface charge imbalance means that the objects will exhibit attractive or repulsive forces. This surface charge imbalance, which yields static electricity, can be generated by touching two differing surfaces together and then separating them due to the phenomena of contact electrification and the triboelectric effect. Rubbing two nonconductive objects generates a great amount of static electricity. This is not just the result of friction; two nonconductive surfaces can become charged by just being placed one on top of the other. Since most surfaces have a rough texture, it takes longer to achieve charging through contact than through rubbing. Rubbing objects together increases amount of adhesive contact between the two surfaces. Usually insulators, e.g., substances that do not conduct electricity, are good at both generating, and holding, a surface charge. Some examples of these substances are rubber, plastic, glass, and pith. Conductive objects only rarely generate charge imbalance except, for example, when a metal surface is impacted by solid or liquid nonconductors. The charge that is transferred during contact electrification is stored on the surface of each object. Electrostatic generators, devices which produce very high voltage at very low current and used for classroom physics demonstrations, rely on this effect. The presence of electric current does not detract from the electrostatic forces nor from the sparking, from the corona discharge, or other phenomena. Both phenomena can exist simultaneously in the same system. :See also: ''Wimshurst machine'', and ''Van de Graaff generator''.

Charge neutralization

Natural electrostatic phenomena are most familiar as an occasional annoyance in seasons of low humidity, but can be destructive and harmful in some situations (e.g. electronics manufacturing). When working in direct contact with integrated circuit electronics (especially delicate MOSFETs). In the presence of flammable gas, care must be taken to avoid accumulating and suddenly discharging a static charge (see Electrostatic discharge).

Electrostatic induction

Electrostatic induction, discovered by British scientist John Canton in 1753 and Swedish professor Johan Carl Wilcke in 1762 is a redistribution of charges in an object caused by the electric field of a nearby charge. For example, if a positively charged object is brought near an uncharged metal object, the mobile negatively-charged electrons in the metal will be attracted by the external charge, and move to the side of the metal facing it, creating a negative charge on the surface. When the electrons move out of an area they leave a positive charge due to the metal atoms' nuclei, so the side of the metal object facing away from the charge acquires a positive charge. These ''induced charges'' disappear when the external charge is removed. Induction is also responsible for the attraction of light objects, such as balloons, paper scraps and foam packing peanuts to static charges. The surface charges induced in conductive objects exactly cancel external electric fields inside the conductor, so there is no electric field inside a metal object. This is the basis for the electric field shielding action of a Faraday cage. Since the electric field is the gradient of the voltage, electrostatic induction is also responsible for making the electric potential (voltage) constant throughout a conductive object.

Static electricity

Before the year 1832, when Michael Faraday published the results of his experiment on the identity of electricities, physicists thought "static electricity" was somehow different from other electrical charges. Michael Faraday proved that the electricity induced from the magnet, voltaic electricity produced by a battery, and static electricity are all the same. Static electricity is usually caused when certain materials are rubbed against each other, like wool on plastic or the soles of shoes on carpet. The process causes electrons to be pulled from the surface of one material and relocated on the surface of the other material. A static shock occurs when the surface of the second material, negatively charged with electrons, touches a positively charged conductor, or vice versa. Static electricity is commonly used in xerography, air filters, and some coating processes used in manufacturing. Static electricity is a build-up of electric charges on two objects that have become separated from each other. Small electrical components can be damaged by static electricity, and component manufacturers use a number of antistatic devices to avoid this.

Static electricity and chemical industry

When different materials are brought together and then separated, an accumulation of electric charge can occur which leaves one material positively charged while the other becomes negatively charged. The mild shock that you receive when touching a grounded object after walking on carpet is an example of excess electrical charge accumulating in your body from frictional charging between your shoes and the carpet. The resulting charge build-up upon your body can generate a strong electrical discharge. Although experimenting with static electricity may be fun, similar sparks create severe hazards in those industries dealing with flammable substances, where a small electrical spark may ignite explosive mixtures with devastating consequences. A similar charging mechanism can occur within low conductivity fluids flowing through pipelines—a process called flow electrification. Fluids which have low electrical conductivity (below 50 picosiemens per meter), are called accumulators. Fluids having conductivities above 50 pS/m are called non-accumulators. In non-accumulators, charges recombine as fast as they are separated and hence electrostatic charge generation is not significant. In the petrochemical industry, 50 pS/m is the recommended minimum value of electrical conductivity for adequate removal of charge from a fluid. An important concept for insulating fluids is the static relaxation time. This is similar to the time constant (tau) within an RC circuit. For insulating materials, it is the ratio of the static dielectric constant divided by the electrical conductivity of the material. For hydrocarbon fluids, this is sometimes approximated by dividing the number 18 by the electrical conductivity of the fluid. Thus a fluid that has an electrical conductivity of 1 pS/cm (100 pS/m) will have an estimated relaxation time of about 18 seconds. The excess charge within a fluid will be almost completely dissipated after 4 to 5 times the relaxation time, or 90 seconds for the fluid in the above example. Charge generation increases at higher fluid velocities and larger pipe diameters, becoming quite significant in pipes or larger. Static charge generation in these systems is best controlled by limiting fluid velocity. The British standard BS PD CLC/TR 50404:2003 (formerly BS-5958-Part 2) Code of Practice for Control of Undesirable Static Electricity prescribes velocity limits. Because of its large impact on dielectric constant, the recommended velocity for hydrocarbon fluids containing water should be limited to 1 m/s. Bonding and earthing are the usual ways by which charge buildup can be prevented. For fluids with electrical conductivity below 10 pS/m, bonding and earthing are not adequate for charge dissipation, and anti-static additives may be required.

Applicable standards

*BS PD CLC/TR 50404:2003 Code of Practice for Control of Undesirable Static Electricity *NFPA 77 (2007) Recommended Practice on Static Electricity *API RP 2003 (1998) Protection Against Ignitions Arising Out of Static, Lightning, and Stray Currents

Electrostatic induction in commercial applications

Electrostatic induction was used in the past to build high-voltage generators known as influence machines. The main component that emerged in these times is the capacitor. Electrostatic induction is also used for electro-mechanic precipitation or projection. In such technologies, charged particles of small sizes are collected or deposited intentionally on surfaces. Applications range from electrostatic precipitator to electrostatic coating and inkjet printing. Recently a new wireless power transfer technology has been based on electrostatic induction between oscillating distant dipoles.

See also

*Electromagnetism *Electronegativity *Electrostatic discharge *Electrostatic separator *Electrostatic voltmeter *Ionic bond *Permittivity and relative permittivity *Quantisation of charge

Footnotes

References

* * * *

Further reading

;Essays *William J. Beaty (1997) "

Humans and sparks: The Cause, Stopping the Pain, and 'Electric People

'" ;Books *William Cecil Dampier (1905) ''The Theory of Experimental Electricity'', Cambridge University Press, (Cambridge physical series). xi, 334 p. illus., diagrs. 23 cm. LCCN 05040419 //r33 *William Thomson Kelvin (1872

Reprint of Papers on Electrostatics and Magnetism By William Thomson Kelvin

Macmillan *Alexander McAulay (1893) ''The Utility of Quaternions in Physics''

Electrostatics—General Problem

Macmillan *Alexander Russell (1904) ''A Treatise on the Theory of Alternating Currents'', Cambridge University Press

Second edition, 1914, volume 1

Second edition, 1916, volume 2

via Internet Archive

External links

*

The Feynman Lectures on Physics Vol. II Ch. 4: Electrostatics

Man's static jacket sparks alert

. BBC News, 16 September 2005.

Static Electricity and Plastics

. Wolfson Electrostatics News pages *ttp://amasci.com/weird/unusual/e-wall.html Invisible Electrostatic Wall at 3M adhesive tape plantbr>Downloadable electrostatic BEM modules in MATLAB for simple capacitance problems

Introduction_to_Electrostatics:_Point_charges_can_be_treated_as_a_distribution_using_the_[[Dirac_delta_function

.html" style="text-decoration: none;"class="mw-redirect" title="Dirac delta function">Introduction to Electrostatics: Point charges can be treated as a distribution using the Dirac_delta_function">Introduction_to_Electrostatics:_Point_charges_can_be_treated_as_a_distribution_using_the_[[Dirac_delta_function

{{Authority_control [[Category:Electrostatics.html" style="text-decoration: none;"class="mw-redirect" title="Dirac delta function

">Dirac delta function">Introduction to Electrostatics: Point charges can be treated as a distribution using the [[Dirac delta function

{{Authority control [[Category:Electrostatics">