ZETA

Zeta (, ; uppercase Ζ, lowercase ζ; grc, ζῆτα, el, ζήτα, label=Demotic Greek, classical or ''zē̂ta''; ''zíta'') is the sixth letter of the Greek alphabet. In the system of Greek numerals, it has a value of 7. It was derived from the Phoenician letter zayin . Letters that arose from zeta include the Roman Z and Cyrillic З.

Name

Unlike the other Greek letters, this letter did not take its name from the Phoenician letter from which it was derived; it was given a new name on the pattern of beta, eta and theta.

The word ''zeta'' is the ancestor of ''zed'', the name of the Latin letter Z in Commonwealth English. Swedish and many Romanic languages (such as Italian and Spanish) do not distinguish between the Greek and Roman forms of the letter; "''zeta''" is used to refer to the Roman letter Z as well as the Greek letter.

Uses

Letter

The letter ζ represents the voiced alveolar fricative in Modern Greek.

The sound represented by zeta in Greek before 400 BC is disputed. See Ancient Greek phonology and Pronunciation of Ancient Greek in teaching.

Most handbooks agree on attributing to it the pronunciation (like ''Mazda''), but some scholars believe that it was an affricate (like adze). The modern pronunciation was, in all likelihood, established in the Hellenistic age and may have already been a common practice in Classical Attic; for example, it could count as one or two consonants metrically in Attic drama.

Arguments for

# PIE *''zd'' becomes ζ in Greek (e.g. *''sísdō'' > ). Contra: these words are rare and it is therefore more probable that *''zd'' was absorbed by *''dz'' (< *''dj'', *''gj'', *''j''); further, a change from the cluster /zd/ to the affricate /dz/ is typologically more likely than the other way around (which would violate the sonority hierarchy).
# Without there would be an empty space between and in the Greek sound system (), and a voiced affricate would not have a voiceless correspondent. Contra: a) words with and are rare, and exceptions in phonological and (even more so) phonotactic patterns are in no way uncommon; b) there was in etc.; and c) there was in fact a voiceless correspondent in Archaic Greek ( > Attic, Boeotian , Ionic, Doric ).
# Persian names with ''zd'' and ''z'' are transcribed with ζ and σ respectively in Classical Greek (e.g. ''Artavazda'' = ~ ''Zara(n)ka-'' = . Similarly, the Philistine city Ashdod was transcribed as .
# Some inscriptions have -ζ- written for a combination -ς + δ- resulting from separate words, e.g. θεοζοτος for θεος δοτος "god-given".
# Some Attic inscriptions have -σζ- for -σδ- or -ζ-, which is thought to parallel -σστ- for -στ- and therefore to imply a pronunciation.
# ν disappears before ζ like before σ(σ), στ: e.g. * > , * > , * > . Contra: ν may have disappeared before /dz/ if one accepts that it had the allophone in that position like /ts/ had the allophone : cf. Cretan ~ (Hinge).
# Verbs beginning with ζ have in the perfect reduplication like the verbs beginning with στ (e.g. = ). Contra: a) The most prominent example of a verb beginning with στ has in fact < *''se-'' in the perfect reduplication (); b) the words with /ts/ > σ(σ) also have : Homer , Ion. .
# Alcman, Sappho, Alcaeus and Theocritus have σδ for Attic-Ionic ζ. Contra: The tradition would not have invented this special digraph for these poets if was the normal pronunciation in all Greek. Furthermore, this convention is not found in contemporary inscriptions, and the orthography of the manuscripts and papyri is Alexandrine rather than historical. Thus, indicates only a different pronunciation from Hellenistic Greek , i.e. either or .
# The grammarians Dionysius Thrax. and Dionysius of Halicarnassus class ζ with the "double" () letters ψ, ξ and analyse it as σ + δ. Contra: The Roman grammarian Verrius Flaccus believed in the opposite sequence, δ + σ (in Velius Longus, ''De orthogr''. 51), and Aristotle says that it was a matter of dispute (''Metaph''. 993a) (though Aristotle might as well be referring to a pronunciation). It is even possible that the letter sometimes and for some speakers varied in pronunciation depending upon word position, i.e., like the letter X in English, which is (usually) pronounced initially but zor selsewhere (cf. Xerxes).
# Some Attic transcriptions of Asia Minor toponyms (βυζζαντειον, αζζειον, etc.) show a -ζζ- for ζ; assuming that Attic value was , it may be an attempt to transcribe a dialectal pronunciation; the reverse cannot be ruled completely, but a -σδ- transcription would have been more likely in this case. This suggests that different dialects had different pronunciations. (For a similar example in the Slavic languages, cf. Serbo-Croatian ''(iz)među'', Russian между, Polish ''między'', and Czech ''mezi'', "between".)

Arguments for z

# The Greek inscriptions almost never write ζ in words like or , so there must have been a difference between this sound and the sound of . Contra: a few inscriptions do seem to suggest that ζ was pronounced like σδ; furthermore, all words with written σδ are morphologically transparent, and written σδ may simply be echoing the morphology. (Note, for example, that we write "ads" where the morphology is transparent, and "adze" where it is not, even though the pronunciation is the same.)
# It seems improbable that Greek would invent a special symbol for the bisegmental combination , which could be represented by σδ without any problems. , on the other hand, would have the same sequence of plosive and sibilant as the double letters of the Ionic alphabet ψ and ξ , thereby avoiding a written plosive at the end of a syllable. Contra: the use of a special symbol for is no more or no less improbable than the use of ψ for and ξ for , or, for that matter, the later invention ϛ ( stigma) for , which happens to be the voiceless counterpart of . Furthermore, it is not clear that ζ was pronounced when it was originally invented. Mycenean Greek had a special symbol to denote some sort of affricate or palatal consonant; ζ may have been invented for this sound, which later developed into . (For a parallel development, note that original palatal Proto-Slavic developed into in Old Church Slavonic, with similar developments having led to combinations such as зд and жд being quite common in Russian.)
# Boeotian, Elean, Laconian and Cretan ''δδ'' are more easily explained as a direct development from *''dz'' than through an intermediary *''zd''. Contra: a) the sound development ''dz'' > ''dd'' is improbable (Mendez Dosuna); b) ν has disappeared before ζ > δδ in Laconian (Aristoph., ''Lys''. 171, 990) and Boeotian (Sch. Lond. in Dion. Thrax 493), which suggests that these dialects have had a phase of metathesis (Teodorsson).
# Greek in South Italy has preserved until modern times. Contra: a) this may be a later development from or under the influence of Italian; b) even if it is derived from an ancient , it may be a dialectal pronunciation.
# Vulgar Latin inscriptions use the Greek letter Z for indigenous affricates (e.g. ''zeta'' = ''diaeta''), and the Greek ζ is continued by a Romance affricate in the ending > Italian. ''-eggiare'', French ''-oyer''. Italian, similarly, has consistently used Z for and (Lat. ''prandium'' > It. ''pranzo'', "lunch"). Contra: whether the pronunciation of was , or , ''di'' would probably still have been the closest native Latin sound; furthermore, the inscriptions are centuries later than the time for which is assumed.

Summary

* is attested only in the lyric poetry of the Greek isle of Lesbos and the city-state of Sparta during the Archaic Age and in Bucolic poetry from the Hellenistic Age. Most scholars would take this as an indication that the -pronunciation existed in the dialects of these authors.
* The transcriptions from Persian by Xenophon and testimony by grammarians support the pronunciation in Classical Attic.
* is attested from c. 350 BC in Attic inscriptions, and was the probable value in Koine.
* or may have existed in some other dialects in parallel.

Numeral

Zeta has the numerical value 7 rather than 6 because the letter digamma (also called ' stigma' as a Greek numeral) was originally in the sixth position in the alphabet.

Mathematics and science

The uppercase zeta is not used, because it is normally identical to Latin Z. The lower case letter can be used to represent:
*The Riemann zeta function in mathematics
*The damping ratio of an oscillating system in engineering and physics
*The rotational quantity of angular jerk in physics
*The effective nuclear charge on an electron in quantum chemistry
*The electrokinetic potential in colloidal systems
*The lag angle in helicopter blade dynamics
*Relative vorticity in the atmosphere and ocean
*A number whose discrete values (eigenvalues) are the positive roots of transcendental equations, used in the series solutions for transient one-dimensional conduction equations
*The heat flux across or through a plane (industrial materials technology)
*The Weierstrass zeta-function
*In physical chemistry equilibrium computations (using lower case Zeta (ζ)), the extent of reaction
*The height of the surface of a fluid layer

Character encodings

Greek Zeta / Coptic Zata

Mathematical Zeta

These characters are used only as mathematical symbols. Stylized Greek text should be encoded using the normal Greek letters, with markup and formatting to indicate text style.

See also

* Z, z - Latin
* З, з - Ze (Cyrillic)

References

General references

*{{cite book , last1=Allen , first1=W. Sidney , authorlink=W. Sidney Allen , title=Vox Graeca: The Pronunciation of Classical Greek , date=1987 , publisher=Cambridge University Press , isbn=978-0-521-33555-3 , pages=56–59 , url=https://www.google.com/books/edition/Vox_Graeca/yws4Zey-ZnYC?hl=en&gbpv=0
*Hinge, George. “Die Aussprache des griechischen Zeta”, in ''Die Sprache Alkmans: Textgeschichte und Sprachgeschichte''. PhD dissertation. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press, 2001, pp. 212–234

*Méndez Dosuna, Julián. “On <Ζ> for <Δ> in Greek dialectal inscriptions”, ''Die Sprache'' 35 (1993): 82–114.
* Gerhard Rohlfs, Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1962. “Die Aussprache des z (ζ) im Altgriechischen”, ''Das Altertum'' 8 (1962): 3–8.
*Teodorsson, Sven-Tage. “On the pronunciation of ancient greek zeta”, ''Lingua'' 47, no. 4 (April 1979): 323–32.
*Teodorsson, Sven-Tage. “The pronunciation of zeta in different Greek dialects”, in ''Dialectologia Graeca: Actas del II Coloquio internacional de dialectología griega'', eds. E. Crespo et al. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 1993, pp. 305–321.

Greek letters