Yorkshire And Humber Route Utilisation Strategy
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The Yorkshire and Humber Route Utilisation Strategy is a Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS), published by
Network Rail Network Rail Limited is the owner (via its subsidiary Network Rail Infrastructure Limited, which was known as Railtrack plc before 2002) and infrastructure manager of most of the railway network in Great Britain. Network Rail is an "arm's leng ...
in July 2009; it was the twelfth RUS to be completed, not counting the partially completed Network RUS. By default, RUSs are established by the
Office of Rail Regulation The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is a non-ministerial government department responsible for the economic and safety regulation of Britain's railways, and the economic monitoring of National Highways. ORR regulates Network Rail by setting its ...
(ORR) unless the latter objects within 60 days. The RUS is included in NR's map as established. The scope corresponds roughly with Strategic Routes 10 (North Cross-Pennine, North and West Yorkshire ) and 11 (South Cross-Pennine, South Yorkshire and Lincolnshire ). The Y&H RUS picked up several issues from other RUSs, specifically: * Freight RUS, throughout the RUS area * North West RUS, mainly as regards the Calder Valley, Hope Valley and Huddersfield corridors * East Coast Main Line RUS, mainly at Wakefield Westgate, Doncaster, Leeds and York * Lancashire and Cumbria RUS, mainly as regards the Airedale and Calder Valley corridors * the Network RUS, Electrification workstream * the former
Strategic Rail Authority The Strategic Rail Authority (SRA) was a non-departmental public body in the United Kingdom set up under the Transport Act 2000 to provide strategic direction for Rail transport in the United Kingdom, the railway industry. Its motto was 'Brita ...
’s Midland Main Line RUS. Issues in the Y&H RUS were also relevant to the East Midlands RUS (in draft as at early November), mainly at Chesterfield and in Lincolnshire. As with other RUSs, the Y&H RUS took into account a number of responses, including the
Office of Rail Regulation The Office of Rail and Road (ORR) is a non-ministerial government department responsible for the economic and safety regulation of Britain's railways, and the economic monitoring of National Highways. ORR regulates Network Rail by setting its ...
(ORR) . The routes and services covered by the RUS are varied in type. Many lines are used for passenger services with very little, if any, freight; some lines on the other hand are largely for freight. A number of
passenger transport executive In the United Kingdom, passenger transport executives (PTEs) are local government bodies which are responsible for public transport within large urban areas. They are accountable to combined authorities, which were created between 2011 and 2016 ...
s (PTEs) have significant influence over transport planning in the area. Some issues were passed to the Network RUS,
Electrification Electrification is the process of powering by electricity and, in many contexts, the introduction of such power by changing over from an earlier power source. The broad meaning of the term, such as in the history of technology, economic histor ...
workstream. The RUS needs to be seen against existing contingent and prospective schemes, particularly in Control Period 4.


Groups of gaps and issues

The RUS identifies generic groups of gaps and issues * Peak crowding Overcrowding on peak time trains, especially into Leeds and Sheffield * Off-peak crowding Overcrowding between the peaks, possibly leading to suppression of demand * Engineering access Closure of routes for engineering access, possibly leading to suppression of demand * Regional links Connectivity within the RUS area, and between the RUS and external areas * Freight capability Lack of availability owing to inadequacy of diversionary routes, route availability, loading gauge and/or capacity * Reactionary delays Reactionary delays contributing to poor performance. A number of routes and services suffer from overcrowding of passengers in each usually 3-hour peak periods (mostly divided into a middle 'high' peak hour and two 'shoulder' peaks). In almost all cases these problems are foreseen, in the absence of interventions, to get worse owing to forecast growth in passenger traffic. These are simply referred to as "peak crowding" in the detail below.


Subsequent developments

In March 2009 Network Rail published its CP4 Delivery Plan 2009, including Enhancements programme: statement of scope, outputs and milestones,NR Enhancements delivery plan
/ref> confirming most of the recommended interventions. Specific projects, scheduled to cost about one billion pounds in total, with their reference and page numbers in the document, are given below: * 03.05 Strategic Freight Network, Train lengthening projects fund, regarding Hope Valley, p24 * 18.01 Capacity relief to the ECML (GN/GE Joint Line), pp94–95 * 18.07 York Holgate Junction 4th line, p106 * 18.08 Shaftholme Junction re-modelling, pp107–108 * 19.00 Overhead line electrification refurbishment, pp111–112 * 23.00 Northern urban centres - Yorkshire, p125 * 23.01 Capacity improvements (Leeds area), pp126–8 * 23.02 South Yorkshire - train lengthening, p129 * 23.03 South Yorkshire - stabling for Northern, p130 * 25.00 Trans-Pennine line speed improvements, p137


References

{{reflist Network Rail Transport in Yorkshire and the Humber