Weert Dialect

Weert dialect or Weert Limburgish (natively , Standard Dutch: ) is the city dialect and variant of Limburgish spoken in the Dutch city of Weert alongside Standard language. All of its speakers are bilingual with standard Dutch. There are two varieties of the dialect: rural and urban. The latter is called in Standard Dutch and in the city dialect. Van der Looij gives the Dutch name for the peripheral dialect.

Unless otherwise noted, all examples are in .

Influence of Standard Dutch

Some dialect words are frequently replaced with their Standard Dutch counterparts, so that 'chickens', 'you' (pl.) and 'often' are often heard in place of the Limburgish words (or ), and .

The voiced velar stop is used less often by younger speakers, who merge it with the voiced velar fricative . In Standard Dutch, occurs only in loanwords.

Phonology

Consonants

* are bilabial, whereas are labiodental.
* is realized as a bilabial approximant in the onset and as labio-velar in the coda. In this article, both are transcribed with , following the recommendations of Carlos Gussenhoven regarding transcribing the corresponding Standard Dutch phone.
* In the syllable onset, can occur only in proper names and loanwords. In that position, their status is marginal.
* and are found only in onsets of weak syllables.
* and occur only intervocalically.
* Word-initial is restricted to loanwords.
* As in all areas with soft G, are realized as post-palatal (hereafter represented without the diacritics) when they are preceded or followed by a front vowel.
* is a voiced fricative trill, with the fricative component varying between uvular and post-velar . The fricative component is particularly audible in the syllable coda, where a partial devoicing to also occurs.

Vowels

According to Peter Ladefoged, the vowel inventory of the dialect of Weert may be the richest in the world. It features 28 vowels, among which there are 12 long monophthongs (three of which surface as centering diphthongs), 10 short monophthongs and 6 diphthongs. Such a large vowel inventory is a result of the loss of a contrastive pitch accent found in other Limburgish dialects, giving and a phonemic status. Those vowels correspond to the phonemically short and combined with Accent 2 in other dialects.

In the table above, the vowels spelled with , , and are transcribed with phonetically explicit symbols. Elsewhere in the article, the diacritics are ignored for vowels other than and , in case of which the lowering diacritic is essential in order to distinguish them from the close-mid .

* The Weert dialect features five phonetic degrees of openness among unrounded front vowels: close, close-mid, mid, open-mid and open. The long unrounded front vowels differ mostly in height, in addition to the centering glide in . Furthermore, is clearly not front phonologically as it is subject to umlauting in diminutives and in other contexts, as in other Limburgish dialects. This suggests that it is phonologically central, as in Hamont as well as the vowel transcribed with the same symbol in German. This contrast between the phonologically central and the phonologically back surfaces as a phonetic front-back distinction, as is phonetically near-front , whereas is near-back .
* The distinction between , and is a genuine distinction between close-mid, mid and open-mid vowels of the same length, roundedness and very similar backness: . It is much like the distinction found in the Kensiu language. The close-mid is transcribed as such (rather than with ) due to the fact that is typically used for tense/free vowels in Dutch dialectology, whereas is lax/checked, much like the Standard Dutch vowel transcribed with the same symbol.
* The phonetic value of the symbol is far removed from its canonical IPA value , being a close-mid central vowel: (transcribed as a mid-centralized in the table above: ). The symbol is used here because it is a phonological front vowel, as in other dialects of Limburgish.
* Older speakers may have an additional vowel , giving rise to a phonemic contrast between the short closed O (spelled ) and the short open O (spelled ). Other speakers have just three short back vowels , as in Standard Dutch. Elsewhere in the article, the difference is not transcribed and is used for both vowels.
* Some speakers are not secure in the distribution of vs. as well as vs. . In the future, this may lead to a merger of the two pairs, leaving a short vowel system that is exactly the same as in Standard Dutch (phonetic details aside).
* As in other Limburgish dialects, umlauts to and so it patterns with the phonetic mid vowels, rather than the phonetically open-mid .
* The centering diphthongs (as in 'seven', 'door' and 'through') often correspond to the close-mid in the variety: , , . The extensive usage of in the variety brings it considerably closer to Standard Dutch than . The varieties spoken in Nederweert and Ospel also use in this context. The difference is systematic, though it does not occur throughout the entire vocabulary of words with those vowels. For instance, the word meaning 'residence' or 'house' varies between and in both varieties, rather than being or in the variety.

Taking all of that into consideration, the vocalic phonemes of the Weert dialect can be classified much like those found in other Limburgish dialects. Peter Ladefoged says that the Weert dialect is an example of a language variety that needs five height features to distinguish between , , , and , which are igh id-high id id-lowand ow respectively.

In this table, vowels in the ''mid'' row correspond to the open-mid in other dialects. The two vowels in the ''open-mid'' row correspond to the open in other dialects, which means that the ''open-mid'' row can be merged with the ''open'' row, leaving just four phonemic heights. In this article, five heights are assumed, following the sources. In his paper on the best IPA transcription of Standard Dutch, Gussenhoven has criticized the analysis of the open-mid as phonologically open on the basis of the vowel being phonetically too close to be analyzed as open like (which is front in Standard Dutch, just like in Weert).

The vowel+glide sequences , and pattern as the short counterparts of - see below.

Phonetic realization

* The long close-mid often feature a centering glide , which is reflected in how they are spelled in the local orthography: , and . Before nasals, the first two are monophthongized to and . Elsewhere in the article, their diphthongal nature is ignored.
* Among the unrounded front vowels, and are retracted like , being near-front .
* Apart from the phonetically central , the phonemic front rounded vowels are phonetically front, including the onset of : .
* Among the back vowels, and the onset of are advanced like : .
* The vowels written with and are less open than in other dialects, being true-mid . This raising of does not result in a merger with (unlike in Maastrichtian), due to the centering glide found in the latter. Neither does merge with , for the same reason. The back is more open than and , making it similar to the corresponding cardinal vowel . The corresponding short vowels have the same quality: .
* The closing diphthongs are similar in quality to their Standard Dutch counterparts. Their ending points are more open than in Maastrichtian, in which especially and end in fully close glides and when they are combined with Accent 1, in addition to the rounded starting point of : (the ending point of is also fully close: ).

Phonotactics

* occurs only in unstressed syllables.
* are phonological long monophthongs despite their obvious diphthongal nature. That is because they can occur before , unlike any of the six phonological diphthongs and . However, at least sometimes violates that rule, as it occurs in the name of the town itself () and derivatives.
* are rare before .
* Among the long open(-mid) vowels, and appear only before sonorants, making them checked vowels. They directly correspond to the short checked vowels combined with Accent 2 in other dialects (in which the vowel corresponding to Weert is written with ). Thus, the phonological behavior of the long and is very different to that of , which is a free vowel like the other long vowels.
* The closing diphthongs are rare in the word-final position.

Differences in transcription

Sources differ in the way they transcribe the unrounded front vowels of the Weert dialect in words such as 'to say', 'leaf' (dim.), 'dishcloth' and 'tent'. The differences are listed below.

This means that the symbols and have the opposite values, depending on the system. In this article, they stand for the vowels in words such as and . However, use them for the vowels in and , whereas and are written with and , respectively. In IPA transcriptions of Limburgish, the usual symbols employed for such words are and . In this article, a phonetically explicit transcription is used, not least because the latter two vowels are as close as in Weert. This transcription closely follows the symbols chosen by , though he does not use the lowering diacritic for the vowels in and . Furthermore, the phonetic open front vowel of Weert is , which is as front as and .

The closing diphthongs are given a phonetically explicit transcription in this article to match the changes described above. This kind of transcription has been used by e.g. for vowels found in a transitional Brabantian-Limburgish dialect of Orsmaal-Gussenhoven.

Vowel+glide sequences

The Weert dialect allows a massive amount of vowel+glide sequences. Both short and long vowels can precede and ; in addition to that, the combinations with short vowels can be followed by a tautosyllabic consonant. There are five times as many possible combinations of a vowel followed by than the possible combination of a vowel+: 15 in the former case () and just 3 in the latter case (). Out of those, both and are marginal.

The sequences , and contrast with the phonemic diphthongs . The former begin with more open vowels than the phonemic diphthongs: . As stated above, the ending points of the phonemic diphthongs are lower than the glides and : , similarly to the diphthongs found in Standard Dutch, though they do not undergo monophthongization to , unlike the corresponding sounds in Maastrichtian (whenever they are combined with Accent 2). In addition, are all longer than . Thus, what in tonal dialects of Limburgish is the contrast between 'legs' (pronounced with Accent 1) and 'leg' (pronounced with Accent 2) is a length and vowel quality difference in Weert: vs. . Other (near-)minimal pairs include 'German' (adj.) vs. 'fun' and 'eye' vs. 'also'. This kind of contrast between a vowel+glide sequence and a diphthong is extremely rare in the world's languages.

Suprasegmentals

The Weert dialect features an intonation system that is very similar to Standard Dutch. The stress pattern is the same as in the standard language. It does not feature a contrastive pitch accent, instead, the difference between Accent 1 and Accent 2 found in the more easterly dialects of Limburgish corresponds to a vowel length distinction in Weert; compare 'rabbits' and 'mountains' with 'rabbit' and 'mountain'. The phonological vowel+glide sequences correspond to combined with Accent 1 in other dialects, whereas the phonological diphthongs (which are longer than the vowel+glide sequences) correspond to combined with Accent 2 in other dialects.

According to Linda Heijmans, Weert dialect may have never been tonal at all, and the use of contrastive vowel length in minimal pairs such as – could have sprung from the desire to sound like speakers of tonal dialects spoken nearby Weert, such as the dialect of Baexem. This hypothesis has been rejected by Jo Verhoeven, who found that Weert speakers can still distinguish between the former tonal pairs on the basis of tone whenever vowel length is ambiguous. Thus, his findings support the theory that the former tone distinction was at some point reinterpreted as a vowel length distinction.

Sample

The sample text is a reading of the first sentence of The North Wind and the Sun.

Phonetic transcription

Orthographic version

References

Bibliography

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

{{DEFAULTSORT:Weert Dialect
Central Limburgish dialects
Culture of Limburg (Netherlands)
Languages of the Netherlands
Low Franconian languages
Weert
City colloquials