HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
mathematics Mathematics is an area of knowledge that includes the topics of numbers, formulas and related structures, shapes and the spaces in which they are contained, and quantities and their changes. These topics are represented in modern mathematics ...
, Wedderburn's little theorem states that every
finite Finite is the opposite of infinite. It may refer to: * Finite number (disambiguation) * Finite set, a set whose cardinality (number of elements) is some natural number * Finite verb, a verb form that has a subject, usually being inflected or marke ...
domain Domain may refer to: Mathematics *Domain of a function, the set of input values for which the (total) function is defined ** Domain of definition of a partial function ** Natural domain of a partial function **Domain of holomorphy of a function * ...
is a field. In other words, for finite rings, there is no distinction between domains,
division ring In algebra, a division ring, also called a skew field, is a nontrivial ring in which division by nonzero elements is defined. Specifically, it is a nontrivial ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse, that is, an element ...
s and fields. The Artin–Zorn theorem generalizes the theorem to alternative rings: every finite alternative division ring is a field.


History

The original proof was given by Joseph Wedderburn in 1905,Lam (2001),
p. 204 P. is an abbreviation or acronym that may refer to: * Page (paper), where the abbreviation comes from Latin ''pagina'' * Paris Herbarium, at the ''Muséum national d'histoire naturelle'' * ''Pani'' (Polish), translating as Mrs. * The ''Pacific Repo ...
/ref> who went on to prove it two other ways. Another proof was given by Leonard Eugene Dickson shortly after Wedderburn's original proof, and Dickson acknowledged Wedderburn's priority. However, as noted in , Wedderburn's first proof was incorrect – it had a gap – and his subsequent proofs appeared only after he had read Dickson's correct proof. On this basis, Parshall argues that Dickson should be credited with the first correct proof. A simplified version of the proof was later given by Ernst Witt. Witt's proof is sketched below. Alternatively, the theorem is a consequence of the Skolem–Noether theorem by the following argument. Let D be a finite division algebra with center k. Let :kn^ and q denote the cardinality of k. Every maximal subfield of D has q^ elements; so they are isomorphic and thus are conjugate by Skolem–Noether. But a finite group (the multiplicative group of D in our case) cannot be a union of conjugates of a proper subgroup; hence, n = 1. A later " group-theoretic" proof was given by
Ted Kaczynski Theodore John Kaczynski ( ; born May 22, 1942), also known as the Unabomber (), is an American domestic terrorist and former mathematics professor. Between 1978 and 1995, Kaczynski killed three people and injured 23 others in a nationwide ...
in 1964. This proof, Kaczynski's first published piece of mathematical writing, was a short, two-page note which also acknowledged the earlier historical proofs.


Relationship to the Brauer group of a finite field

The theorem is essentially equivalent to saying that the
Brauer group Brauer or Bräuer is a surname of German origin, meaning "brewer". Notable people with the name include:- * Alfred Brauer (1894–1985), German-American mathematician, brother of Richard * Andreas Brauer (born 1973), German film producer * Arik ...
of a finite field is trivial. In fact, this characterization immediately yields a proof of the theorem as follows: let ''k'' be a finite field. Since the Herbrand quotient vanishes by finiteness, \operatorname(k) = H^2(k^/k) coincides with H^1(k^/k), which in turn vanishes by Hilbert 90.


Proof

Let ''A'' be a finite domain. For each nonzero ''x'' in ''A'', the two maps :a \mapsto ax, a \mapsto xa: A \to A are injective by the cancellation property, and thus, surjective by counting. It follows from the elementary group theorye.g., Exercise 1.9 in Milne, group theory, http://www.jmilne.org/math/CourseNotes/GT.pdf that the nonzero elements of A form a group under multiplication. Thus, A is a
skew-field In algebra, a division ring, also called a skew field, is a nontrivial ring in which division by nonzero elements is defined. Specifically, it is a nontrivial ring in which every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse, that is, an element ...
. To prove that every finite skew-field is a field, we use strong induction on the size of the skew-field. Thus, let A be a skew-field, and assume that all skew-fields that are proper subsets of A are fields. Since the center Z(A) of A is a field, A is a vector space over Z(A) with finite dimension n. Our objective is then to show n = 1. If q is the order of Z(A), then A has order ^. Note that because Z(A) contains the distinct elements 0 and 1, q>1. For each x in A that is not in the center, the
centralizer In mathematics, especially group theory, the centralizer (also called commutant) of a subset ''S'' in a group ''G'' is the set of elements \mathrm_G(S) of ''G'' such that each member g \in \mathrm_G(S) commutes with each element of ''S'', ...
_ of x is clearly a skew-field and thus a field, by the induction hypothesis, and because _ can be viewed as a vector space over Z(A) and A can be viewed as a vector space over _, we have that _ has order ^ where d divides n and is less than n. Viewing ^, A^, and the ^_ as groups under multiplication, we can write the class equation :q^n - 1 = q - 1 + \sum where the sum is taken over the conjugacy classes not contained within ^, and the d are defined so that for each conjugacy class, the order of ^_ for any x in the class is ^ - 1. ^ - 1 and q^ - 1 both admit
polynomial factorization In mathematics and computer algebra, factorization of polynomials or polynomial factorization expresses a polynomial with coefficients in a given field or in the integers as the product of irreducible factors with coefficients in the same dom ...
in terms of cyclotomic polynomials :\Phi_f(q). In the polynomial identities :x^n-1 = \prod_ \Phi_m(x) and x^d-1 = \prod_ \Phi_m(x), we set x = q. Because each d is a proper divisor of n, :\Phi_n(q) divides both ^ - 1 and each , so by the above class equation \Phi_n(q) must divide q - 1, and therefore :, \Phi_n(q), \leq q-1. To see that this forces n to be 1, we will show :, \Phi_n(q), > q-1 for n>1 using factorization over the complex numbers. In the polynomial identity :\Phi_n(x) = \prod (x - \zeta), where \zeta runs over the primitive n-th roots of unity, set x to be q and then take absolute values :, \Phi_n(q), = \prod , q - \zeta, . For n>1, we see that for each primitive n-th root of unity \zeta, :, q-\zeta, > , q-1, because of the location of q, 1, and \zeta in the complex plane. Thus :, \Phi_n(q), > q-1.


Notes


References

* * {{cite book , last1=Lam , first1=Tsit-Yuen , title=A first course in noncommutative rings , edition=2 , series=
Graduate Texts in Mathematics Graduate Texts in Mathematics (GTM) (ISSN 0072-5285) is a series of graduate-level textbooks in mathematics published by Springer-Verlag. The books in this series, like the other Springer-Verlag mathematics series, are yellow books of a standard ...
, volume=131 , year=2001 , publisher=Springer , isbn=0-387-95183-0


External links


Proof of Wedderburn's Theorem at Planet Math
* Mizar system proof: http://mizar.org/version/current/html/weddwitt.html#T38 Theorems in ring theory