Design and construction
The ''No.21'' was a wire-braced monoplane with bat-like wings and triangular horizontal tail. There was no vertical fin, and lateral control was intended to be accomplished by shifting the pilot's body sideways.Weissenborn (1988) The wings were constructed with radial bamboo ribs and covered with silk, and had a span of 36 ft (11 m). They had some dihedral when opened out to the flying position. The fuselage was of rectangular box section with constant height, curved to taper inwards at front and rear when seen from above. Four small wheels were fixed to the bottom. An analysis in 1980 concluded that the design as a whole was flimsy and aerodynamically unsound. Although having two engines and twin propellers, the aircraft was not a conventional twin. It had separate engines for ground running and flight, both designed and made by Whitehead. The ground engine was of 10 hp (7.5 kW) and drove the wheels to reach takeoff speed. Propulsion was then changed to a 20 hp (15 kW) acetylene engine driving two counter-rotating tractor propellers mounted on outriggers. The aircraft was intended to take off under its own power and without assistance. A description and photographs of Whitehead's aircraft appeared in '' Scientific American'' in June 1901, stating that the "novel flying machine" had just been completed, and "is now ready for preliminary trials." The article included photographs showing the aircraft on the ground.Claims of flight
A minority of commentators claim that the No. 21 flew, but the majority of historians reject these claims. Whitehead was quoted in a July 26 article in the ''Minneapolis Journal'', credited to the ''New York Sun'', in which he described the first two trial flights of his machine on May 3. Andrew Cellie and Daniel Varovi were mentioned as his financial backers who also assisted in the trial flights. The machine was unmanned and carried of sand as ballast and flew to an altitude of for an 1/8 of a mile (). According to Whitehead, the machine flew a distance of 1/2 mile () during its second test flight for one and one-half minutes before crashing into a tree. He also explained his desire to keep the location of any future experiments hidden to avoid drawing a crowd who might make a "snap-shot verdict of failure". In an article in the August 18, 1901, issue of the ''Bridgeport Sunday Herald'' a reporter states that he witnessed a night test of the machine, at first unpiloted and loaded with sand bags, and later with Whitehead at the controls. The story was reprinted in the ''Replicas
Two replicas have been flown. They both introduced modern technologies and do not inform as to whether the original might have been capable of flight. In 1986 American Andrew Kosch, a local high school teacher and hang glider pilot, led a team which built a replica of Whitehead's ''No.21''. The replica used two modern ultralight aircraft engines in place of the original steam and acetylene engines, and the landing gear track was increased for better ground handling. Initially, actor Cliff Robertson piloted the replica while under tow behind a sports car. On December 29, 1986, Kosch made several flights in the replica, reporting that he flew 100 m (330 ft). A second replica was built in Germany, using modern research and materials, such as fibreglass, and with a modern engine. On February 18, 1998, it was flown 500 m (1,600 ft).See also
* Gustave Whitehead * Claims to the first powered flightReferences
Citations
Bibliography
*{{cite magazine , magazine = Scientific American , volume = 156 , issue = 6 , date = June 1901 , page = 357 , title = A New Flying Machine , url = http://www.machine-history.com/Gustave%20Whitehead%20Flying%20Machine , url-status = dead , archiveurl = https://web.archive.org/web/20120324181648/http://www.machine-history.com/Gustave%20Whitehead%20Flying%20Machine , archivedate = March 24, 2012 (Hosted by machine-history.com)External links
Brief video of U.S. replica in flight (:55 to 1:04)