Urban Evolution

Urban evolution refers to the heritable genetic changes of populations in response to urban development and anthropogenic activities in urban areas. Urban evolution can be caused by mutation, genetic drift, gene flow, or evolution by natural selection.Johnson, M. T. J., and J. Munshi-South. 2017. Evolution of life in urban environments. Science 358:aam8327. Biologists have observed evolutionary change in numerous species compared to their rural counterparts on a relatively short timescale.

Strong selection pressures due to urbanization play a big role in this process. The changed environmental conditions lead to selection and adaptive changes in city-dwelling plants and animals. Also, there is a significant change in species composition between rural and urban ecosystems.

Shared aspects of cities worldwide also give ample opportunity for scientists to study the specific evolutionary responses in these rapidly changed landscapes independently. How certain organisms (are able to) adapt to urban environments while others cannot, gives a live perspective on rapid evolution.

Urbanization

With urban growth, the urban-rural gradient has seen a large shift in distribution of humans, moving from low density to very high in the last millennia. This has brought a large change to environments as well as societies.

Urbanization transforms natural habitats to completely altered living spaces that sustain large human populations. Increasing congregation of humans accompanies the expansion of infrastructure, industry and housing. Natural vegetation and soil are mostly replaced or covered by dense grey materials. Urbanized areas continue to expand both in size and number globally; in 2018, the United Nations estimated that 68% of people globally will live in ever-larger urban areas by 2050.

Urban evolution selective agents

Urbanization intensifies diverse stressors spatiotemporally such that they can act in concert to cause rapid evolutionary consequences such as extinction, maladaptation, or adaptation. Three factors have come to the forefront as the main evolutionary influencers in urban areas: the urban microclimate, pollution, and urban habitat fragmentation. These influence the processes that drive evolution, such as natural and sexual selection, mutation, gene flow and genetic drift.

Urban microclimate

A microclimate is defined as any area where the climate differs from the surrounding area. Modifications of the landscape and other abiotic factors contribute to a changed climate in urban areas. The use of impervious dark surfaces which retain and reflect heat, and human generated heat energy lead to an urban heat island in the center of cities, where the temperature is increased significantly. A large urban microclimate does not only affect temperature, but also rainfall, snowfall, air pressure and wind, the concentration of polluted air, and how long that air remains in the city.

These climatological transformations increase selection pressure. Certain species have shown to be adapting to the urban microclimate.

Urban pollution

Many species have evolved over macroevolutionary timescales by adapting in response to the presence of toxins in the environment of the planet. Human activities, including urbanization, have greatly increased selection pressures due to pollution of the environment, climate change, ocean acidification, and other stressors. Species in urban settings must deal with higher concentrations of contaminants than naturally would occur.

There are two main forms of pollution which lead to selective pressures: energy or chemical substances. Energy pollution can come in the form of artificial lighting, sounds, thermal changes, radioactive contamination and electromagnetic waves. Chemical pollution leads to the contamination of the atmosphere, the soil, water and food. All these polluting factors can alter species’ behavior and/or physiology, which in turn can lead to evolutionary changes.

Urban habitat fragmentation

The fragmentation of previously intact natural habitats into smaller pockets which can still sustain organisms leads to selection and adaptation of species. These new urban patches, often called urban green spaces, come in all shapes and sizes ranging from parks, gardens, plants on balconies, to the breaks in pavement and ledges on buildings. The diversity in habitats leads to adaptation of local organisms to their own niche. And contrary to popular belief, there is higher biodiversity in urban areas than previously believed. This is due to the numerous microhabitats. These remnants of wild vegetation or artificially created habitats with often exotic plants and animals all support different kinds of species, which leads to pockets of diversity inside cities.

With habitat fragmentation also comes genetic fragmentation; genetic drift and inbreeding within small isolated populations results in low genetic variation in the gene pool. Low genetic variation is generally seen as bad for chances of survival. This is why probably some species aren’t able to sustain themselves in the fragmented environments of urban areas.

Urban evolution examples

The differing urban environment imposes different selection pressures than the natural setting. These stressors elicit phenotypic changes in populations of organisms which may be due to phenotypic plasticity—the ability of individual organisms to express different phenotypes from the same genotype as a result of exposure to different environmental conditions--or actual genetic changes.

In considering the examples of urban evolution, observed phenotypic divergences or differences in responses to urbanization have to be genetically based and adaptive (increase fitness in that particular environment) to be tagged as evolution and adaptation, respectively. Hence, it will be appropriate to consider neutral/non-adaptive and adaptive urban evolution, with the later needing to be sufficiently proven.

Although there is widespread agreement that adaptation is occurring in urban populations, there are almost no proven examples almost all are cases of selection, reasoned speculation connecting to adaptive benefit, but no evidence of actual adaptive phenotype. At this time only six examples are demonstrated:

* Atlantic killifish ('' Fundulus heteroclitus'') have evolved both whole-body chemical tolerance and aryl hydrocarbon receptors in several unconnected events.
* The peppered moth is an example of ''industrial melanism''. These moths changed color from light to dark due to anthropogenic air pollution during the industrial revolution. The black melanism phenotype frequency saw a rise during the time of heavy air pollution and a fall after cleaner air became more normal again in cities.
* Acorn ants ('' Temnothorax curvispinosus'') adapt to tolerate either heat island or lower rural temperatures.
* The water flea (''Daphnia magna'') has adapted to urban settings and displays the ability to better tolerate heat.
* Ragweed (''Ambrosia artemisiifolia'') has very divergent flowering phenology.
* Holy hawksbeard ('' Crepis sancta'') develops larger size, later flowering, delayed senescence, higher photosynthetic capacity, higher water use efficiency, and higher leaf nitrogen.

Some interesting cases of possible adaptation which remain insufficiently proven are:

* Bobcats (''Lynx rufus'') in Los Angeles, CA, USA were selected for immune genetics loci by an epidemic of mange there, however Serieys ''et al.'' 2014 does not provide proof of resistant phenotype.
* Water dragon lizards ('' Intellagama lesueurii'') in Brisbane, Australia do show divergence. Littleford-Colquhoun ''et al.'' 2017 find divergence of both morphology and genetics, but remind readers that they have not demonstrated that this is adaptive.

Claimed examples of urban adaptation include:

* The common blackbird (''Turdus merula'') may be the first example of actual speciation by urban evolution, due to the urban heat island and food abundance the urban blackbird has become non-migratory in urban areas. The birds also sing higher and at different times, and they breed earlier than their rural counterparts which leads to sexual selection and a separated gene pool. Natural behavioral differences have also formed between urban and rural birds.
* Urban Anole lizards ('' Anolis'') have evolved longer limbs and more lamellae compared with anolis lizards from forest habitats. This because the lizards can navigate the artificial building materials used in cities better.
* The urban Hawksbeard plant (''Crepis'') has evolved a higher percentage of heavier nondispersing seeds compared to rural hawksbeard plants, because habitat fragmentation leads to a lower chance of dispersing seeds to settle.
* White clover (''Trifolium repens'') has repeatedly adapted to urban environments on a global scale due to genetic changes in a heritable antiherbivore defense trait (hydryogen cyanide) in response to urban-rural changes in drought stress, vegetation and winter temperatures.
*The London Underground mosquito (''Culex pipiens'' f. ''molestus'') has undergone reproductive isolation in populations at higher latitudes, including the London Underground railway populations, where attempted hybridizations between ''molestus'' and the surface-living ''Culex pipiens pipiens'' are not viable in contrast to populations of ''pipiens'' and ''molestus'' in cities at lower latitudes where hybrids are found naturally.{{Cite journal, last1=Byrne, first1=Katharine, last2=Nichols, first2=Richard A, date=January 1999, title=''Culex pipiens'' in London Underground tunnels: differentiation between surface and subterranean populations, journal=Heredity, volume=82, issue=1, pages=7–15, doi=10.1038/sj.hdy.6884120, pmid=10200079, issn=0018-067X, doi-access=free

In one case selection is widely expected to occur and yet is not found:

* Coyotes (''Canis latrans'') in New York City, USA show no immune selection in the work of DeCandia ''et al.'' 2019.

References

Ecology terminology
Community ecology
Habitat
Ecological processes
Evolutionary ecology
City