''United States v. Davila'', 569 U.S. 597 (2013), was a
United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a
federal judge Federal judges are judges appointed by a federal level of government as opposed to the state/provincial/local level.
United States
A US federal judge is appointed by the US President and confirmed by the US Senate in accordance with Article 3 of ...
participates in the
plea process in violation of rule 11(c) of the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a guilty plea need not be vacated if the record shows
prejudice to the decision to plea due to rule 11(h).
[ Syllabus p. 2]
Notes
References
*
*
*
*
*
External links
*
2013 in United States case law
United States Supreme Court cases
United States Supreme Court cases of the Roberts Court
{{SCOTUS-case-stub