Description
'Scampstoniensis' was said to droop its branches very distinctly and regularly, giving the tree a symmetrical form, as though it had been regularly trained and trimmed, unlike 'Camperdownii', which had less of a tendency to regular drooping, and with less abundant foliage. A 1911 article in 'Historical Notes of Rillington and Scampston' described 'Scampstoniensis' as "remarkable for its size when mature, for its spreading habit, and its rough corky bark".Pests and diseases
'Scampstoniensis' is not noted to have any resistance toCultivation
Loudon described the Scampston Elm, in a letter of 1836 to the ''Newcastle Courant'', as "generally understood to have been extensively planted in Northumberland about 80 years ago". The Scampston Elm was in cultivation on both sides of the Atlantic in the 19th century and was occasionally referred to as ''Ulmus americana pendula''. (Other European elms described as 'American' by various nurseries include 'Vegeta', 'Lutescens', and 'Nana'.) The American horticulturalist Frank Jesup Scott in ''The Art of Beautifying Suburban Home Grounds of Small Extent'' (1870) described how two "Scampston elms" could be pruned and trained to form an archway of weeping elm. "A weeping variety of the Scampston Elm" was described at theNotable trees
A weeping elm in theSynonymy
*''Ulmus glabra'' var. ''scampstoniensis'': KirchnerAccessions
North America
*Notes
References
External links
* Sheet labelled ''U. americana pendula'' ynonym of 'Scampstoniensis'(Hortus Leiden, 1931) * Sheet labelled ''U. glabra scampstoniensis'', from Späth nursery, 1902 * Sheet labelled ''U. glabra scampstoniensis'', from Späth nursery, 1902 * Sheet labelled ''U. glabra scampstoniensis'', from Späth nursery, 1902 * Sheet labelled ''U. americana pendula'' ynonym of 'Scampstoniensis'Hort. Audibert (