Taromai
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

, read variously as Tarumoi and Tarumī, was a local ruler of
Okinawa Island is the largest of the Okinawa Islands and the Ryukyu (''Nansei'') Islands of Japan in the Kyushu region. It is the smallest and least populated of the five main islands of Japan. The island is approximately long, an average wide, and has an ...
, who was given the title of
King of Sannan was a title given to a line of local rulers on Okinawa Island from the late 14th century to the early 15th century. Contemporary sources on the Kings of Sannan are scarce and mutually conflicting. The narratives on the kings have gradually been ex ...
. He first contacted the Chinese emperor in 1415, claiming himself to be an heir to King Ōōso, without clearly specifying his blood relationship with the former king. He claimed that Ōōso was killed by his elder brother Tabuchi, who had in turn been killed by local chiefs, in favor of Crown Prince Taromai. This report was highly unusual because Okinawans routinely deceived the Chinese into thinking that the throne was normally succeeded from the father to the son. Historian Dana Masayuki raises the possibility that it was a cover story for Taromai's illegitimate seizure of power. His last contact was of 1429. The Chinese records suggest that the Chinese had no information on when and how the king disappeared. Because the King of Chūzan continued tributary missions, the Chinese later speculated that the Kings of Sannan and Sanhoku had been removed by the King of Chūzan. Taromai was quite unusual for Okinawan rulers in Chinese records, in that the name appears to represent a genuine Okinawan given name: Taru-mi. ''Tarū'' was a common given name while ''-mi'' (<*''omopi'') was a suffix commonly used by ruling elites. Historian Wada Hisanori notes that the ''
Rekidai Hōan The Rekidai Hōan (歴代宝案), Precious Documents of Successive Generations, is an official compilation of diplomatic documents of the royal government of the Ryūkyū Kingdom. Covering the period from 1424 to 1867, it contains records, writte ...
'' contains diplomatic documents supposedly sent by Taromai, King of Sannan. Wada speculates that
Shō Hashi was the last King of Chūzan and the first king of the Ryukyu Kingdom, uniting the three polities of Chūzan, Hokuzan, and Nanzan by conquest and ending the Sanzan period. Family * Father: Shishō * mother: daughter of Miiko * Wife: sister of I ...
, the unifier of Okinawa Island, had already kept Sannan under his control. According to his hypothesis, Taromai was the eldest son of Shō Hashi while Ōōso was either a pseudonym of Shō Hashi or his puppet ruler. Shō Hashi gave southern Okinawa to the first son while the rule of northern Okinawa was left to his second son
Shō Chū was a king of the Ryukyu Kingdom of the First Shō dynasty. He ruled from 1439 to 1444. Shō Chū was the second son of his father, King Shō Hashi. After his father conquered the Kingdom of Hokuzan, Shō Chū was appointed in 1422. Shō Chū ...
. Okinawans later identified the King of Sannan as the Aji (local ruler) of Ōzato but had no information on how many rulers had assumed the title. Because Taromai was the last known King of Sannan, a logical consequence was that the Aji of Ōzato who was annihilated by
Shō Hashi was the last King of Chūzan and the first king of the Ryukyu Kingdom, uniting the three polities of Chūzan, Hokuzan, and Nanzan by conquest and ending the Sanzan period. Family * Father: Shishō * mother: daughter of Miiko * Wife: sister of I ...
was Taromai. However, neither the ''
Chūzan Seikan , compiled in 1650 by Shō Shōken, is the first official history of the Ryūkyū Kingdom. In six scrolls, the main text occupies five and an accompanying summary the sixth. Unlike later official histories such as '' Chūzan Seifu'' and '' Kyūyō ...
'' (1650) nor
Sai Taku , also known by his Japanese-style name , was a Ryukyuan aristocrat and bureaucrat in the royal government of the Ryūkyū Kingdom. Sai Taku was born in Kumemura on January 4, 1645. He descended from Cai Xiang. He took part in the compilation of ...
's edition of the ''
Chūzan Seifu was an official history of the Ryūkyū Kingdom compiled between 1697 and 1701 by a group of scholar-officials led by Sai Taku. It was a Kanbun translated version of ''Chūzan Seikan''. Later, it was rewritten into Classical Chinese by Sai Tak ...
'' (1701) identified the Aji of Ōzato in question as such. According to the ''Chūzan Seikan'' (1650), the unnamed King of Sannan lost popular support. Shō Hashi, then the Aji of Sashiki, overthrew the King of Sannan and became King of Sannan himself. The King of Sannan then replaced Bunei as King of Chūzan in 1421. Shō Hashi finally overthrew the
King of Sanhoku was a title given to a line of local rulers on Okinawa Island from the late 14th century to the early 15th century. Contemporary sources on the Kings of Sanhoku are extremely scarce, and narratives on them have gradually been expanded over time. I ...
in 1422, unifying Okinawa Island. The ''Chūzan Seikan'' did not date Shō Hashi's overthrow of the King of Sannan.
Sai Taku , also known by his Japanese-style name , was a Ryukyuan aristocrat and bureaucrat in the royal government of the Ryūkyū Kingdom. Sai Taku was born in Kumemura on January 4, 1645. He descended from Cai Xiang. He took part in the compilation of ...
's edition of the ''
Chūzan Seifu was an official history of the Ryūkyū Kingdom compiled between 1697 and 1701 by a group of scholar-officials led by Sai Taku. It was a Kanbun translated version of ''Chūzan Seikan''. Later, it was rewritten into Classical Chinese by Sai Tak ...
'' (1701) generally followed the ''Chūzan Seikan''. Sai On's edition of ''Chūzan Seifu'' (1725) is drastically different from these two books. Having access to Chinese diplomatic records, Sai On added the records of tributary missions sent under the name of King Taromai. The last king was now identified as Taromai. More importantly, Sai On changed the date of the King of Sannan's downfall to 1429, postdating Shō Hashi's conquest of the King of Chūzan in 1406 and that of the King of Sanhoku in 1416. Sai On naïvely inferred that the King of Sannan was removed immediately after the last tributary mission of 1429. Sai On's attempt to resolve contradictions between the traditional Okinawan narrative and Chinese sources was a source of another inconsistency. The ''Chūzan Seikan'' (1650) suggested that the Aji of Shimasoe-Ōzato had been the King of Sannan. Because Sashiki, Shō Hashi's stronghold, neighbored Shimasoe-Ōzato, his conquest must have started with the overthrow of the Aji of Shimasoe-Ōzato. Even though Sai On put Shō Hashi's conquest of the King of Sannan at the final phase of his conquest, he somehow kept the episode of Shō Hashi's takeover of the Aji of Ōzato in his early years. To resolve the new contradiction, Sai On had to re-identify the Aji of Ōzato in question as the Aji of Shimasoe-Ōzato while the King of Sannan, annihilated supposedly much later, was identified as the Aji of Shimajiri-Ōzato.


References

{{s-end Kings of Sannan