Takelma was the language spoken by the
Latgawa
Latgawa are Native American people who lived in the Rogue Valley of interior southwest Oregon. In their own language "Latgawa" means "those living in the uplands," though they were also known as the Walumskni by the neighboring Klamath tribe.
T ...
and
Takelma people and Cow Creek band of Upper Umpqua. It was first extensively described by
Edward Sapir in his graduate thesis, ''The Takelma Language of Southwestern Oregon''.
The last fluent speaker of Takelma, with whom Sapir worked while writing about the language, was
Frances Johnson (Gwísgwashãn). A dictionary from English to Takelma is currently being created in the hopes it can be revived.
Dialects
*
Latgawa
Latgawa are Native American people who lived in the Rogue Valley of interior southwest Oregon. In their own language "Latgawa" means "those living in the uplands," though they were also known as the Walumskni by the neighboring Klamath tribe.
T ...
dialect, spoken in southwestern Oregon along the upper
Rogue River
*Lowland (
Takelma) dialect, spoken in southwestern Oregon in the
Rogue Valley
There was possibly a Cow Creek dialect spoken in southwestern Oregon along the
South Umpqua River
The South Umpqua River is a tributary of the Umpqua River, approximately long, in southwestern Oregon in the United States. It drains part of the Cascade Range east of Roseburg. The river passes through a remote canyon in its upper reaches then ...
, Myrtle Creek, and
Cow Creek.
Genealogical relations
Takelma is commonly included in the controversial
Penutian
Penutian is a proposed grouping of language families that includes many Native American languages of western North America, predominantly spoken at one time in British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, and California. The existence of a Penutian st ...
macro-family, as first suggested by
Edward Sapir.
Within Penutian, Takelma has been grouped together with the
Kalapuyan languages in a "
Takelma–Kalapuyan" or "Takelman" language family. However, an unpublished paper by Tarpent & Kendall (1998) finds this relationship to be unfounded because of the extremely different morphological structures of Takelma and Kalapuyan. DeLancey follows this position.
Phonology
Consonants
The consonant phonemes as described by Sapir are:
[
]
Vowels
The vowel system of the Takelma language comprises the six vowels /a e i o u ʉ/, as well as their lengthened counterparts /aː eː iː oː uː ʉː/.
Tones
Three tones are noted as /v́/, /v̀/, and /v/.
Grammar
Takelma, like many Native American languages, is polysynthetic
In linguistic typology, polysynthetic languages, formerly holophrastic languages, are highly synthetic languages, i.e. languages in which words are composed of many morphemes (word parts that have independent meaning but may or may not be able to ...
meaning that one can link together many different morphemes to form a word. Therefore one single word can often contain a lot of information that in English would be portrayed in a full sentence. This is mainly done by adding affixes to verbs.
Tense
Takelma has 6 different tenses listed below with the first (aorist) being the basic tense which is equivalent to the immediate future, present, and past.
# Aorist
# Potential
# Future
# Inferential
# Present Imperative
# Future Imperative
Person and possession
In Takelma, possession is marked by a set of affixes. Most of them are suffixes but there is one prefix. Below is a table of the four declensional sets.
Set I is only ever used with terms of kinship. For example:
Set II is used with bare stems or stems having the formant. For example:
Alternations between –t and –tʰ in set II and set IV is regular and predictable.
Set III is used with stems having other formants. For example:
Set IV is used in locative constructions. For example:
versus
versus
wa-té
‘to me’
Object markers
Takelma has a complex system of verbal pronominal suffixes and is also accompanied by the loss of case markers on nouns. This represents a complete shift to full head marking. In the 3rd person object marker in Takelma, the suffix –kʰwa which is realized on the verb. However the distribution of –kʰwa is very restricted.
Here is the full set of object markers:
For the 1st and 2nd person objects overt marking is required with clear difference between singular and plural. For 3rd person there is no difference between singular and plural and there is also alternation between the suffix –kʰwa and zero suffix.
The zero variant occurs with animates as well as inanimate, covert pronouns, and overt nominals.
However –kʰwa occurs in three distinct environments. First, when the subject is also 3rd person. Second, it is always used when the object is higher in animacy than the subject. This means that the object refers to a human also a mythic animal that is thought of as a human being. The third situation is when the subject and object are of equal animacy but the object outranks the subject in topicality.[Aissen, Judith. Differential Coding, Partial Blocking, and Bidirectional OT. UC Santa Cruz, n.d. Web. 5 May 2015.]
Words
References
Further reading
*
Comparative vocabulary of the languages spoken by the 'Umpqua,' 'Lower Rogue River' [Takelma] and 'Calapooia' tribes of Indians" (35 pp., original dated May 1859)
California Language Archive
OLAC resources in and about the Takelma language
{{North American languages
L
Penutian languages
Indigenous languages of Oregon
Indigenous languages of the Pacific Northwest Coast
Extinct languages of North America
Northwest Coast Sprachbund (North America)
Language isolates of North America
Languages extinct in the 1930s
1934 disestablishments in Oregon