Stylopage

''Stylopage'' is a polytypic genus of predacious fungus in the order Zoopagales, within the subphylum Zoopagomycotina. All known species of ''Stylopage'' subsist on various species of amoebae or nematodes by trapping their prey, typically using an adhesive substance that coats their vegetative hyphae, and absorbing nutrients through the projection of a haustorium. 17 extant ''Stylopage'' species have been described thus far.

History and taxonomy

''Stylopage'' was first described in 1935 by Charles Drechsler, with the discovery and growth of three new species – ''S. haploe'', ''S. araea'', and ''S. lepte'' – on media that had been grown from decaying vegetable matter found in temperate woodlands near Washington, D.C. The genus name refers to the presence of conidia on long, rod-like fertile hyphae, as well as its predatory nature. Drechsler initially placed ''Stylopage'' within the now-defunct Phycomycetes. Upon discovery of further ''Stylopage'' species, Drechsler placed the genus within the newly-created family, Zoopagaceae. Identification and description of further ''Stylopage'' species has largely been determined based on similarities in conidial morphology and observed predatory behaviour. ''Stylopage'' has been described as both a predator and an obligate parasite. Regardless, all known species of ''Stylopage'' exhibit predatory behaviour towards either amoebae or nematodes.

Upon the reclassification of orders formerly belonging to Zygomycota, including Zoopagaceae, ''Stylopage'' and all other Zoopagales were placed within the subphylum Zoopagomycotina, under the new phylum Zoopagomycota. The Zoopagales have since been proven as a monophyletic order; within the Zoopagales, ''Stylopage'' forms a sister clade with ''Acaulopage'', another predatory amoebophagous fungus.

However, more recent phylogenetic tree reconstructions based on 18S rRNA phylogeny contend that ''Stylopage'' itself is not monophyletic, and that ''S. hadra'' forms a sister clade with ''Zoophagus'' spp., suggesting that similarities in conidial morphology are not enough to determine monophyly within ''Stylopage''. These phylogenetic analyses also indicated that ''S. hadra'' conidia incorporate a bacterial endosymbiont also associated with '' Acaulopage tetraceros''.

Geographical distribution and habitat

''Stylopage'' generally thrives in temperate, moist soils or decaying vegetation beds in temperate Northern hemisphere regions. Since the discovery of the type specimens, multiple ''Stylopage'' species have been grown from soils across Eastern North America. ''Stylopage'' growth has been found as far west as Colorado, as far north as Michigan and Southern Ontario, and as far south as Florida.

In addition, ''Stylopage'' can be found across Europe, with samples of multiple species collected from the United Kingdom, Ireland, and Germany. ''S. rhabdospora'' has also been cultured from samples obtained from the banks of the Sakawa River, in Japan. Drechsler initially reported that temperate, wet climates seem to promote the most growth of ''Stylopage'' species, and that North American summer temperatures were not conducive to its growth. Most samples of both nematophagous and amoebophagous species have been obtained from temperate riverbanks and forest floors, replete with rotting vegetation. More common species such as ''S. hadra'' and ''S. araea'' can be found ubiquitously in temperate Northern hemisphere leaf litter.

Multiple ''Stylopage'' species have been reported from farmlands and agricultural soils in more tropical countries, albeit in areas and conditions with comparatively cooler climates. ''S. hadra'', one of the most common nematophagous species, has been found in both Hawaii and India. ''S. leiohypha'' has been also been found in India. Multiple ''Stylopage'' species have been reported from temperate mountain forest floors in Kenya. Interestingly, there is evidence that ''S. hadra'' can grow in agricultural soils with moderate levels (up to 1.8 mmol) of lead contamination.

Animal dung has also been a highly fruitful area for ''Stylopage'' culture sources. ''S. anomala'', ''S. cymosa'', ''S. grandis'', ''S. leiohypha'', and ''S. hadra'' can all be found on horse or sheep dung sourced from temperate farmlands in the United Kingdom and Ireland. ''S. grandis'' has also been found on sheep dung from temperate Argentinian farming areas.

Morphology and growth

''Stylopage'' is characterized by sparsely-growing, dichotomously branching, aseptate vegetative hyphae. The genus is also distinguished from morphologically similar genera, such as ''Acaulopage'', by its production of aseptate conidia on long, erect conidiophores. Vegetative hyphae are typically colourless or hyaline in appearance, although in some species, such as ''S. hadra'', the adhesive substance used to constrain prey can cause the vegetative hyphae to appear golden-yellow under magnification. The size and shape of conidia, number of conidia per conidiophore, dimensions of hyphae, and presence or absence of zygospores all vary between species of ''Stylopage''. Almost all species that produce multiple conidia per conidiophore do so successively - that is, after the production of one conidium, the conidiophore will branch out and continue elongating to produce another, often after previous conidia have detached.

Due to its predaceous metabolism, ''Stylopage'' is dependent on the presence of other heterotrophs – most often, saprophytic nematodes or amoebae to thrive. As such, even the most well-studied species, such as ''S. hadra'', cannot readily be grown on a pure, sterile culture without significant prior presence of saprophytic bacteria and fungi. Many ''Stylopage'' species can be grown in laboratory conditions, but a relatively permeable surface must be used as a substrate for the necessary saprophyte growth. For example, Drechsler reported that little to no ''Stylopage'' growth could be seen on relatively hard cornmeal agar in initial assays, due to the inability of organisms such as amoebae and nematodes to support themselves on the surface. More recent studies have found more success with growing ''Stylopage'' in culture on water agar or 2% cornmeal agar, inoculated with molds originating from rotting leaves or animal dung. In keeping with the preference of ''Stylopage'' for temperate habitats, the optimal isolation and growth temperature for ''Stylopage'' in culture seems to be room temperature, in cultures originating from both dung and leaf litter. As such, cultures of different ''Stylopage'' species have been successful between 20-28 °C. Depending on the species, growth of ''Stylopage'' vegetative hyphae can begin as quickly as 48 hours or as slowly as 2 weeks after initial inoculation of the substrate.

Arthropod dispersal has been identified as a possible major dispersal mechanism for at least one species of ''Stylopage''. ''S. anomala'' conidia exhibit close association to both ''Sappinia pedata'', an amoeba, and to the ventral head and lower leg regions of gamasid mites associated with moose dung. This is accomplished through adhesive material released from the beaked apex of each conidium. These mites are motile and also associate with species of beetles themselves, enabling the ''S. anomala'' conidia to gain a powerful dispersal mechanism. Aquatic dispersal has also been suggested as a mechanism of dispersal, and ''S. scoliospora'' shows noticeable adaptations to aquatic life, such as comparatively long, curved hyphae and the possibility of prostrate conidiophore development.

Nutrition

''Stylopage'' species typically capture prey in a similar fashion. First, amoeba or nematode makes contact with section of vegetative hyphae. The prey organism is then held in place, most often by an adhesive substance produced by the fungus at the point of contact. Once the prey organism has been immobilized, a haustorium produced by the fungus will penetrate its cell membrane and/or integument and branch out inside the organism. Once the internal organs and nutrients of the prey organism have been consumed, ''Stylopage'' will sequentially erect septa within the haustoria as the hyphal cytoplasm is withdrawn, in effect “walling off” the hyphal sections as it empties them. This leaves only the outer membrane of the prey organism, which remains attached to the point of contact on the hyphae, even after the haustoria have withdrawn.

There are species-specific variations on this process. For example, ''S. hadra'', one of the most ubiquitous and well-studied ''Stylopage'' species, produces the adhesive material only upon contact with a nematode. Other species, such as ''S. araea'' and ''S. haploe'', both of which prey on amoebae, seem to possess vegetative hyphae that are entirely covered with adhesive material. ''S. hadra'' often, but not always, produces a bulb-like protuberance at the hyphal point of contact with the nematode. This growth is entirely covered in adhesive, which helps to constrain the larger nematodes caught by ''S. hadra''. Growth of these protuberances is not seen in ''Stylopage'' species which prey on comparatively smaller amoebae or nematodes; for example, these protuberances are not seen in ''S. leiophypha'', which preys on nematodes roughly half the length of the those on which ''S. hadra'' preys.

There is further variation within the amoebophagous species of ''Stylopage''. For example, ''S. rhabdospora'' has been observed trapping amoebae directly from conidia, from the site of germ tube growth. Ultrastructure studies of ''S. rhapdospora'' have shown that it does produce an adhesive substance at all, yet still manages to hold amoebae in place, due to the fact that it can project haustoria into the amoeba upon contact more quickly than the amoeba can move away. The branches of these haustoria become bulbous in shape once inside the amoeba, so that the amoeba cannot escape.

Uniquely, the type specimen of ''S. anomala'' did not exhibit visible predatory behaviour, instead feeding on amoebae that became trapped on its adhesive hyphae and subsequently perished. However, a different strain observed by Malloch & Blackwell did display predatory behaviour, actively trapping and preying on still-living amoebae.

Species-specific preferences have also been observed strikingly in ''S. araea''. Amoebae of the genera ''Saccamoeba'', ''Naegleria'', and ''Sappinia'' were targeted by ''S. araea'', but their presence seemed to inhibit conidial formation, instead leaving the fungus to show only vegetative growth. Amoebae infected with the KSL5 giant virus displayed resistance to ''S. araea'', remaining undigested by haustoria. Interestingly, ''S. araea'' has also shown the ability to penetrate the protective cysts formed by amoebae to resist the haustoria of species such as ''Acaulopage''.

Applications

There has been limited exploration of ''Stylopage'', among other predatory fungi, as a biological control agent for certain damaging amoebae and nematodes, although no substantive experiments have yet been conducted. The use of ''S. araea'' in water treatment systems to limit the presence of infection-causing amoebae has been theorized. ''Stylopage'' was one genus of many whose increased predatory soil density was found to be associated with higher root biomass in sugarcane soils, possibly indicating a future use in plant parasite control. However, since known ''Stylopage'' species do not produce known amoebicidal or nematicidal toxins, their use as a commercially reproducible biological control agent may be limited.

References

{{Taxonbar, from=Q10682649

Zygomycota