South African Class 16E on:
[Wikipedia]
[Google]
[Amazon]
The Spoornet Class 16E of 1990 was a South African electric locomotive.
During 1990 and 1991,
The Class 6E1 was built with sophisticated traction linkages on their bogies. Together with the locomotive's electronic wheel-slip detection system, these traction struts, mounted between the linkages on the bogies and the locomotive body and colloquially referred to as grasshopper legs, ensured the maximum transfer of power to the rails without causing wheel-slip by reducing the adhesion of the leading bogie and increasing that of the trailing bogie by as much as 15% upon starting. This feature was controlled by electronic wheel-slip detection devices and an electric weight transfer relay which reduced the anchor current to the leading bogie by as much as 50A in notches 2 to 16.
Beginning in 2000, Spoornet embarked on a project to rebuild Series 2 to 11 Class 6E1 locomotives as well as Class 16E pairs which were originally from those series to Class 18E, Series 1 and 
Since the driving cab's noise level had to be below 85 decibels, cab 2 was selected as the Class 18E driving cab primarily based on its lower noise level compared to cab 1 which was closer and more exposed to the compressor's noise and vibration. Another factor was the closer proximity of cab 2 to the low voltage switch panel. The fact that the handbrake was located in cab 2 was not a deciding factor, but was considered an additional benefit.
While the older Class 6E1, Series 2 to 7 locomotives had been built with a brake system consisting of various valves connected to each other with pipes and commonly referred to as a "bicycle frame" brake system, the Class 6E1, Series 8 to 11 locomotives were built with a compressed air equipment frame brake system, commonly referred to as a brake rack. Since the design of the rebuilt Class 18E locomotives included the same brake rack, the rebuilding project was begun with the newer series 8 to 11 locomotives to reduce the overall cost of rebuilding.
The known Class 16E locomotives which were used in this project were all rebuilt to Class 18E, Series 1 locomotives. Their numbers and renumbering details are shown in Table 2.
File:Class 6E1 Series 2 E1272 (16-100A).jpg, No. 16-100A & B (E1272 & E1273) in SAR Gulf Red and Whiskers livery, Germiston, 21 November 1991
File:SAR Class 6E1 Series 5 E1607 16-335A.JPG, No. 16-335A (E1607) in Spoornet lined orange at Koedoespoort, 2 October 2009
File:SAR Class 16E 16-410A.JPG, No. 16-410A (E1850) in Spoornet orange livery at Christiana, 22 September 2006
File:Class 6E1 Series 6 E1709 (16-422B).jpg, No. 16-422B & A (E1709 & E1669) in Spoornet orange livery, Germiston, 6 December 1991
Spoornet
Transnet Freight Rail is a South African rail transport company, formerly known as Spoornet. It was part of the South African Railways and Harbours Administration, a state-controlled organisation that employed hundreds of thousands of people ...
semi-permanently coupled several pairs of otherwise unmodified Series 2 to Series 9 Class 6E1 electric locomotives, reclassified them to Class 16E and allocated a single shared unit number to each pair, with the individual locomotives in the pairs inscribed "A" or "B".
Manufacturer
The 3 kV DC Class 6E1 electric locomotive was built for theSouth African Railways
Transnet Freight Rail is a South African rail transport company, formerly known as Spoornet. It was part of the South African Railways and Harbours Administration, a state-controlled organisation that employed hundreds of thousands of people ...
(SAR) by Union Carriage & Wagon
Union Carriage & Wagon (UCW) is a rolling stock manufacturer in South Africa.
History
Union Carriage & Wagon was established in 1957. Initial shareholders were Commonwealth Engineering (51%), Budd Company (25%) and Leyland Motors (12%). By 1965, ...
(UCW) in Nigel, Transvaal. The electrical equipment was supplied by the General Electric Company (GEC). UCW did not allocate builder's numbers to the locomotives which it built for the SAR, but used the SAR unit numbers for their record keeping.
Characteristics
Bogies
The Class 6E1 was built with sophisticated traction linkages on their bogies. Together with the locomotive's electronic wheel-slip detection system, these traction struts, mounted between the linkages on the bogies and the locomotive body and colloquially referred to as grasshopper legs, ensured the maximum transfer of power to the rails without causing wheel-slip by reducing the adhesion of the leading bogie and increasing that of the trailing bogie by as much as 15% upon starting. This feature was controlled by electronic wheel-slip detection devices and an electric weight transfer relay which reduced the anchor current to the leading bogie by as much as 50A in notches 2 to 16.
Brakes
The locomotive itself used air brakes, but it was equipped to operate trains with air or vacuum brakes. While hauling a vacuum braked train, the locomotive's air brake system would be disabled and the train would be controlled by using the train brakes alone to slow down and stop. While hauling an air braked train, on the other hand, the locomotive brakes would engage along with the train brakes. While working either type of train downgrade, the locomotive's regenerative braking system would also work in conjunction with the train brakes. Operation - South African Classes 6E, 6E1, 16E, 17E and 18E When the locomotive was stopped, the air brakes on both bogies were applied together. The handbrake or parking brake, located in cab no. 2, only operated on the unit's last axle, or no. 7 and 8 wheels.Orientation
These dual-cab locomotives had a roof access ladder on one side only, just to the right of the cab access door. The roof access ladder end was marked as the no. 2 end. A corridor along the centre of the locomotive connected the cabs, which were identical apart from the fact that the handbrake was located in cab 2. A pantograph hook stick was stowed in a tube mounted below the lower edge of the locomotive body on the roof access ladder side.South African Railways Index and Diagrams Electric and Diesel Locomotives, 610mm and 1065mm Gauges, Ref LXD 14/1/100/20, 28 January 1975, as amendedClass 16E pairing
Class 16E electric locomotives were two-unit semi-permanently coupled Class 6E1 pairs coupled at their no. 1 ends. The aim was to accomplish savings on cab maintenance by abandoning the no. 1 end cabs in terms of maintenance and using only the no. 2 end cabs. During 1990 and 1991 Spoornet made up several such semi-permanently coupled pairs of otherwise unmodified Series 3 to Series 9 Class 6E1 locomotives, each pair getting reclassified to Class 16E, renumbered to a shared new unit number and with each unit inscribed as either the A or B unit. This was unlike the procedure which was followed later with Class 17E locomotives which were internally modified and reclassified Class 6E1 Series 7, 8 and 9 locomotives, but which remained in service as individual locomotives and retained their original unit numbers after reclassification.Information gathered from the rebuild files of individual locomotives at Transnet Rail Engineering's Koedoespoort shops, or obtained from John Middleton as well as several Transnet employees The original intent was to convert all the serving Class 6E and all eleven series of Class 6E1 to Class 16E locomotive pairs, with the following planned Class 16E number allocation: * Class 6E: 16-001 to 16-010 * Class 6E1, series 1: 16-100 to 16-104, 16-109 and 16-110 * Class 6E1, series 2: 16-105 to 16-108 * Class 6E1, series 3: 16-207 to 16-237 * Class 6E1, series 4: 16-300 to 16-317 * Class 6E1, series 5: 16-318 to 16-335 * Class 6E1, series 6: 16-418 to 16-430 * Class 6E1, series 7: 16-400 to 16-417 and 16-431 to 16-437 * Class 6E1, series 8: 16-501 to 16-518 * Class 6E1, series 9: 16-500 and 16-521 to 16-536 * Class 6E1, series 10: 16-600 to 16-611 * Class 6E1, series 11: 16-700 to 16-711 The idea was not well thought through, however, and the law ofunintended consequences
In the social sciences, unintended consequences (sometimes unanticipated consequences or unforeseen consequences) are outcomes of a purposeful action that are not intended or foreseen. The term was popularised in the twentieth century by Ameri ...
soon manifested itself. In practice it was found that some locomotive pairs worked together better than others so that some pairings were successful while others gave problems. Maintenance issues presented further drawbacks since when only one unit in a Class 16E pair needed repairs, it meant that the partner was out of commission as well because their no. 1 end cabs were not kept serviceable. All these and other complications led to the programme being abandoned very quickly, long before all the Class 6E and 6E1 could be paired off.
A few of the successful and problem-free Class 16E pairings did continue to run that way for more than fifteen years with numbers and B and 16-411A and B being the last to be separated. The rest were either separated during rebuilding to Class 18E or gradually converted back to dual cab Class 6E1s as soon as one or both in the pair required major maintenance, all of the latter reverting to their original Class 6E1 unit numbers. Their former Class 16E numbers were still visible on many of these locomotives years later.
None of the Class 6E or the Class 6E1, Series 1, 10 or 11 locomotives were ever paired into Class 16Es. Those which are known to have received this treatment are shown in Table 1.
Rebuilding to Class 18E
Beginning in 2000, Spoornet embarked on a project to rebuild Series 2 to 11 Class 6E1 locomotives as well as Class 16E pairs which were originally from those series to Class 18E, Series 1 and Series 2 Series 2 could refer to:
* Apple Watch Series 2, a smart watch by Apple
* Aston Martin Lagonda Series 2, the automobile model
* Aston Martin V8 Series 2, the automobile model
* BMW 2 Series, the automobile model line
* GeForce 2 series, line of nV ...
at the Transnet Rail Engineering
Transnet Engineering is a rolling stock manufacturer and maintenance company. It was established when the engineering workshops of Transnet were transferred to a separate division as Transwerk. It was rebranded Transnet Rail Engineering, and the ...
workshops at Koedoespoort. In the process, the cab at the no. 1 end was stripped of all controls and the driver's front and side windows were blanked off to have a toilet installed, thereby forfeiting the locomotive's bi-directional ability.
Since the driving cab's noise level had to be below 85 decibels, cab 2 was selected as the Class 18E driving cab primarily based on its lower noise level compared to cab 1 which was closer and more exposed to the compressor's noise and vibration. Another factor was the closer proximity of cab 2 to the low voltage switch panel. The fact that the handbrake was located in cab 2 was not a deciding factor, but was considered an additional benefit.
While the older Class 6E1, Series 2 to 7 locomotives had been built with a brake system consisting of various valves connected to each other with pipes and commonly referred to as a "bicycle frame" brake system, the Class 6E1, Series 8 to 11 locomotives were built with a compressed air equipment frame brake system, commonly referred to as a brake rack. Since the design of the rebuilt Class 18E locomotives included the same brake rack, the rebuilding project was begun with the newer series 8 to 11 locomotives to reduce the overall cost of rebuilding.
The known Class 16E locomotives which were used in this project were all rebuilt to Class 18E, Series 1 locomotives. Their numbers and renumbering details are shown in Table 2.
Illustration
References
External links
{{Locomotives of South Africa Bo-Bo locomotives Cape gauge railway locomotives 3170 Railway locomotives introduced in 1990 Union Carriage & Wagon locomotives