Discovery
Scotty was discovered by Robert Gebhardt, a high school principal from Eastend, Saskatchewan, who accompanied a team of palaeontologists from the Royal Saskatchewan Museum (RSM) on a prospective expedition into the Frenchman Formation alongside theDescription
Size
In 2010, the University of Alberta Department of Biological Sciences' Scott Pearson began work on a research project that sought to compare the sizes of known ''T. rex'' fossils. His findings, published in 2019, yielded that Scotty is the largest (in weight and length), having out-measured the previous largest known ''Tyrannosaurus rex:'' SUE of the Chicago Field Museum (FMNH 2081). After prolonged study of the growth patterns in the bones, "Scotty" was also declared as one of the oldest known ''T. rex'' fossils at 30 years old. The specimen known as Trix is also estimated to have been 30 years old upon its death. However, its age was later revised to ~23–27 years old. Scotty has even been recognised as one of the youngest and least mature adults while being the largest specimen for the species. Scotty is reported to be long and weighed an estimated . Despite it not being a complete fossil, palaeontologists were able to create the estimation for the weight and length through measurements of important weight bearing bones such as the femur, hip, and shoulder bones that have all been measured to be larger and thicker with Scotty than the corresponding bones with Sue. Going from the latest study Scotty exceeds Sue in 84.6% of the published measurements. Scotty has a larger hip girdle than Sue its femur is also longer and wider than Sue's at 133 cm and has a circumference of 590 mm while the specimen Sue has a femur length of 132 cm and a circumference of 580 mm. The projected weight was calculated by analysing how much weight the leg bones would have been able to support. The fossil is dated at around 68 million years. Scientists are unsure if Scotty was male or female, which is not unusual for a ''T. rex'' specimen. Both specimens Sue and Scotty had their weights estimated in the latest study. The method used to calculate the mass in the latest study was the same for both of the specimens and the data shows that Scotty is heavier than Sue is. The latest study put Scotty's weight at an estimated 8,870 kg (9.7 tons) while Sue is estimated at 8,462 kg (9.3 tons) Sue has had similar results made on its weight in the past such as Scott Hartman's result of 8,400 kg (9.2 tons) obtained through GDI analysis. This is also not the first time that Scotty has been estimated to out mass the specimen Sue. A study conducted back in 2014 that estimated the weight for some of the large theropod dinosaurs and both Sue and Scotty were included. This older study concluded that Sue was around 7,377 kg (8.1 tons) with a weight range of 5,531 kg (6 tons) to 9,224 kg (10 tons) while Scotty was heavier at 8,004 kg (8.8 tons) with a weight range of 6,000 kg (6.6 tons) to 10,007 kg (11 tons). While the reported measurements and weight for Scotty are larger than those of Sue, some scientists posit that the two fossils are too close in size to officially declare Scotty the largest. Evolutionary expert John Hutchinson of the University of London's Royal Veterinary College has stated that the 5% margin separating SUE and Scotty is too close to rule out any error and that the difference most likely came down to inches and ounces, rather than the reported feet. The method that was used to calculate its size is not exact and remains another point of contention for the fossil's titles. This could have resulted in Pearson and his team overestimating Scotty's size. The Chicago Field Museum's resident palaeontologist and curator of dinosaurs, Pete Macovicky, has stated that he believes Scotty and SUE are "statistically indistinguishable". Nonetheless, Scotty has presented scientists with new possibilities for the size and age that ''T. rex'' could have grown to.Pathology
Like other ''T. rex'' fossils, Scotty shows signs of trichomoniasis, a parasitic infection in the jaw that left visible holes in the bone and was unique to this specific species of dinosaur. Additionally, a broken and healed rib on its right side, broken tail vertebra, as well as a hole near the eye socket are possibly the result of another ''T. rex'' attack. Other abnormalities, such as impacted teeth, suggest that Scotty was not only bitten, but also bit other animals.See also
*References
{{Authority control Paleontology in Saskatchewan Tyrannosaurus Cretaceous fossil record Dinosaur fossils