HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Science in a Free Society'' is the 2nd full length book by the
Austria Austria, , bar, Östareich officially the Republic of Austria, is a country in the southern part of Central Europe, lying in the Eastern Alps. It is a federation of nine states, one of which is the capital, Vienna, the most populous ...
n
philosopher of science A philosopher is a person who practices or investigates philosophy. The term ''philosopher'' comes from the grc, φιλόσοφος, , translit=philosophos, meaning 'lover of wisdom'. The coining of the term has been attributed to the Greek th ...
,
Paul Feyerabend Paul Karl Feyerabend (; January 13, 1924 – February 11, 1994) was an Austrian-born philosopher of science best known for his work as a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Berkeley, where he worked for three decades (1958 ...
. It was published in 1978 by Schocken Books and later reprinted by
Verso Books Verso Books (formerly New Left Books) is a left-wing publishing house based in London and New York City, founded in 1970 by the staff of ''New Left Review''. Renaming, new brand and logo Verso Books was originally known as New Left Books. The ...
. While Feyerabend never published a second edition, Verso pressed four copies in 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1987. Parts of the book were reprinted in later editions of ''
Against Method ''Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge'' is a 1975 book by Austrian-born philosopher of science Paul Feyerabend. The author argues that science should become an anarchic enterprise, not a nomic (customary) one; in the cont ...
''. The book largely develops arguments from the first edition of ''Against Method'' and spells out their political implications. The book also contains a collection of previously published material in which he responds to some of his critics of ''Against Method''. In 1979, Feyerabend also published, in German, ''Erkenntnis für freie Menschen'' (Knowledge for Free People), which contains roughly two-thirds of the material from ''Science in a Society'' while expanding on some sections and diminishing others.


Translations

''Science in a Free Society'' has been translated into 6 languages: * Japanese translation: ''Jiyujin no tameno chi: Kagakuron no kaitai e'', Shin'yosha: Tokyo 1982, ix+333 pp. * Spanish translation by Alberto Elena: ''La ciencia en una sociedad libre'', Siglo XXI de España: Madrid 1982, 272 pp. * Turkish translation by Ahmet Kardam: ''Özgür Bir Toplumda Bilim'', Ayrıntı: Istanbul 1987 eprint 1999 265 pp. * Chinese translation by Yazhu Lan, Shangahi Translation Publishing House: Sahnghai 1990, 257 pp. * Arabic translation by al-Sayyid Nafadi: ''al-‘Ilm fī mujtama‘ ḥurr, al-Majlis al-A'lá lil-Thaqāfah'': al-Qāhirah 2000, 162 pp. * Portuguese translation by Vera Joscelyne: ''A Ciência em uma sociedade livre'', UNESP: São Paulo 2011.


Content

The book is divided into three sections. The first section, entitled "Reason and Practice", develops Feyerabend's theory of rationality as something embedded in, rather than separate from, traditions. The second section, "Science in a Free Society", develops Feyerabend's views about the place of science in democratic societies. The final section, "Conversations with Illiterates", provides responses to criticisms of ''Against Method''.


Reason and Practice

The first section develops a version of Protagorean
relativism Relativism is a family of philosophical views which deny claims to objectivity within a particular domain and assert that valuations in that domain are relative to the perspective of an observer or the context in which they are assessed. Ther ...
. Feyerabend argues against two views: idealism, which he defines as the view that the authority of reason is independent from tradition and practice, and naturalism or the view that the authority of reason derives from practice. Idealism is wrong, Feyerabend argues, because the authority of reason depends on its ability to be integrated into a coherent practice. If one were to apply a view of rationality to practice and the practice were to suffer, then the theory of rationality can be rejected. Naturalism is wrong because it treats the norms that already happen to be in practice dogmatically. Feyerabend develops a view that synthesizes elements of each, which he claims amounts to a form of relativism. To allow for collective decision making when traditions conflict, Feyerabend argues for two kinds of dialogues: "guided" and "open" exchanges. Guided exchanges require shared assumptions that 'guide' the deliberation process whereas open exchanges have no prior constraints introduced upon dialogue.


Science in a Free Society

The second section spells out the political implications of relativism. Feyerabend argues against the view that there should be '
experts An expert is somebody who has a broad and deep understanding and competence in terms of knowledge, skill and experience through practice and education in a particular field. Informally, an expert is someone widely recognized as a reliable s ...
' who dictate policy decisions and that experts should be supervised by democratically representative laypeople. He argues that expertise is often exaggerated and laypeople are competent enough to criticize their views. This includes scientific experts. Because of this, Feyerabend thinks that science and the state should be separated in an analogous way as the religion and the state are separated in secular societies.


Conversations with Illiterates

The final section collects some of Feyerabend's previously published responses to criticisms of ''Against Method''. This section is largely
polemical Polemic () is contentious rhetoric intended to support a specific position by forthright claims and to undermine the opposing position. The practice of such argumentation is called ''polemics'', which are seen in arguments on controversial topics ...
and argues that many of his critics suffered from
illiteracy Literacy in its broadest sense describes "particular ways of thinking about and doing reading and writing" with the purpose of understanding or expressing thoughts or ideas in written form in some specific context of use. In other words, huma ...
.


Scholarly Response

Responses to ''Science in a Free'' Society were mixed, but largely positive.


References


Bibliography

* * * * * * * * * * * * {{Authority control 1978 non-fiction books English-language books Books by Paul Feyerabend Philosophy of science Science studies Criticism of science Schocken Books books