Santaló's Formula
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
differential geometry Differential geometry is a mathematical discipline that studies the geometry of smooth shapes and smooth spaces, otherwise known as smooth manifolds. It uses the techniques of differential calculus, integral calculus, linear algebra and multili ...
, Santaló's formula describes how to integrate a function on the unit sphere bundle of a
Riemannian manifold In differential geometry, a Riemannian manifold or Riemannian space , so called after the German mathematician Bernhard Riemann, is a real manifold, real, smooth manifold ''M'' equipped with a positive-definite Inner product space, inner product ...
by first integrating along every
geodesic In geometry, a geodesic () is a curve representing in some sense the shortest path ( arc) between two points in a surface, or more generally in a Riemannian manifold. The term also has meaning in any differentiable manifold with a connection. ...
separately and then over the space of all geodesics. It is a standard tool in integral geometry and has applications in isoperimetric and rigidity results. The formula is named after Luis Santaló, who first proved the result in 1952.


Formulation

Let (M,\partial M,g) be a compact, oriented Riemannian manifold with boundary. Then for a function f: SM \rightarrow \mathbb , Santaló's formula takes the form : \int_ f(x,v) \, d\mu(x,v) = \int_ \left \int_0^ f(\varphi_t(x,v)) \, dt \right\langle v, \nu(x) \rangle \, d \sigma(x,v), where * (\varphi_t)_t is the geodesic flow and \tau(x,v) = \sup\ is the exit time of the geodesic with initial conditions (x,v)\in SM , * \mu and \sigma are the Riemannian volume forms with respect to the
Sasaki metric The Sasaki metric is a natural choice of Riemannian metric on the tangent bundle of a Riemannian manifold. Introduced by Shigeo Sasaki in 1958. Construction Let (M,g) be a Riemannian manifold In differential geometry, a Riemannian manifold o ...
on SM and \partial S M respectively ( \mu is also called Liouville measure), * \nu is the inward-pointing
unit normal In geometry, a normal is an object such as a line, ray, or vector that is perpendicular to a given object. For example, the normal line to a plane curve at a given point is the (infinite) line perpendicular to the tangent line to the curve at ...
to \partial M and \partial_+ SM := \ the ''influx-boundary'', which should be thought of as parametrization of the space of geodesics.


Validity

Under the assumptions that # M is ''non-trapping'' (i.e. \tau(x,v) <\infty for all (x,v)\in SM ) and # \partial M is ''strictly convex'' (i.e. the second fundamental form II_(x) is positive definite for every x \in \partial M ), Santaló's formula is valid for all f\in C^\infty(M). In this case it is equivalent to the following identity of measures: : \Phi^*d \mu (x,v,t) = \langle \nu(x),x\rangle d \sigma(x,v) d t, where \Omega=\ and \Phi:\Omega \rightarrow SM is defined by \Phi(x,v,t)=\varphi_t(x,v). In particular this implies that the ''geodesic X-ray transform'' I f(x,v) = \int_0^ f(\varphi_t(x,v)) \, dt extends to a bounded linear map I: L^1(SM, \mu) \rightarrow L^1(\partial_+ SM, \sigma_\nu), where d\sigma_\nu(x,v) = \langle v, \nu(x) \rangle \, d \sigma(x,v) and thus there is the following, L^1-version of Santaló's formula: : \int_ f \, d \mu = \int_ If ~ d \sigma_\nu \quad \text f \in L^1(SM,\mu). If the non-trapping or the convexity condition from above fail, then there is a set E\subset SM of positive measure, such that the geodesics emerging from E either fail to hit the boundary of M or hit it non-transversely. In this case Santaló's formula only remains true for functions with support disjoint from this exceptional set E.


Proof

The following proof is taken from Lemma 3.3">ref>Guillarmou, Colin, Marco Mazzucchelli, and Leo Tzou. "Boundary and lens rigidity for non-convex manifolds." American Journal of Mathematics 143 (2021), no. 2, 533-575. Lemma 3.3 adapted to the (simpler) setting when conditions 1) and 2) from above are true. Santaló's formula follows from the following two ingredients, noting that \partial_0SM=\ has measure zero. * An integration by parts formula for the geodesic vector field X : : \int_ Xu ~ d \mu = - \int_ u ~ d \sigma_\nu \quad \text u \in C^\infty(SM) * The construction of a resolvent for the transport equation X u = - f: : \exists R: C_c^\infty( SM\smallsetminus\partial_0 SM) \rightarrow C^\infty(SM): XRf = - f \text Rf\vert_ = If \quad \text f\in C_c^\infty( SM\smallsetminus\partial_0 SM) For the integration by parts formula, recall that X leaves the Liouville-measure \mu invariant and hence Xu = \operatorname_G (uX) , the divergence with respect to the Sasaki-metric G . The result thus follows from the
divergence theorem In vector calculus, the divergence theorem, also known as Gauss's theorem or Ostrogradsky's theorem, reprinted in is a theorem which relates the ''flux'' of a vector field through a closed surface to the ''divergence'' of the field in the vol ...
and the observation that \langle X(x,v), N(x,v)\rangle_G = \langle v, \nu(x)\rangle_g , where N is the inward-pointing unit-normal to \partial SM. The resolvent is explicitly given by Rf(x,v) = \int_0^ f(\varphi_t(x,v)) \, dt and the mapping property C_c^\infty( SM\smallsetminus\partial_0 SM) \rightarrow C^\infty(SM) follows from the smoothness of \tau: SM\smallsetminus\partial_0 SM \rightarrow [0,\infty), which is a consequence of the non-trapping and the convexity assumption.


References

*{{cite book, author=Isaac Chavel, url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Wg-gQcvS25sC&q=Santalo%27s+formula, title=Riemannian Geometry: A Modern Introduction, publisher=Cambridge University Press, year=1995, series=Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, volume=108, chapter=5.2 Santalo's formula, isbn=0-521-48578-9 Differential geometry Integrals Riemannian geometry