HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The Ramanujan tau function, studied by , is the function \tau : \mathbb \rarr\mathbb defined by the following identity: :\sum_\tau(n)q^n=q\prod_\left(1-q^n\right)^ = q\phi(q)^ = \eta(z)^=\Delta(z), where with , \phi is the Euler function, is the
Dedekind eta function In mathematics, the Dedekind eta function, named after Richard Dedekind, is a modular form of weight 1/2 and is a function defined on the upper half-plane of complex numbers, where the imaginary part is positive. It also occurs in bosonic string ...
, and the function is a holomorphic cusp form of weight 12 and level 1, known as the discriminant modular form (some authors, notably Apostol, write \Delta/(2\pi)^ instead of \Delta). It appears in connection to an "error term" involved in counting the number of ways of expressing an integer as a sum of 24 squares. A formula due to
Ian G. Macdonald Ian Grant Macdonald (born 11 October 1928 in London, England) is a British mathematician known for his contributions to symmetric functions, special functions, Lie algebra theory and other aspects of algebra, algebraic combinatorics, and combi ...
was given in .


Values

The first few values of the tau function are given in the following table :


Ramanujan's conjectures

observed, but did not prove, the following three properties of : * if (meaning that is a
multiplicative function In number theory, a multiplicative function is an arithmetic function ''f''(''n'') of a positive integer ''n'' with the property that ''f''(1) = 1 and f(ab) = f(a)f(b) whenever ''a'' and ''b'' are coprime. An arithmetic function ''f''(''n'') i ...
) * for prime and . * for all primes . The first two properties were proved by and the third one, called the Ramanujan conjecture, was proved by Deligne in 1974 as a consequence of his proof of the Weil conjectures (specifically, he deduced it by applying them to a Kuga-Sato variety).


Congruences for the tau function

For and , define as the sum of the th powers of the divisors of . The tau function satisfies several congruence relations; many of them can be expressed in terms of . Here are some:Page 4 of #\tau(n)\equiv\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 2^\textn\equiv 1\ \bmod\ 8Due to #\tau(n)\equiv 1217 \sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 2^\text n\equiv 3\ \bmod\ 8 #\tau(n)\equiv 1537 \sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 2^\textn\equiv 5\ \bmod\ 8 #\tau(n)\equiv 705 \sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 2^\textn\equiv 7\ \bmod\ 8 #\tau(n)\equiv n^\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 3^\textn\equiv 1\ \bmod\ 3Due to #\tau(n)\equiv n^\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 3^\textn\equiv 2\ \bmod\ 3 #\tau(n)\equiv n^\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 5^\textn\not\equiv 0\ \bmod\ 5 #\tau(n)\equiv n\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 7\textn\equiv 0,1,2,4\ \bmod\ 7Due to D. H. Lehmer #\tau(n)\equiv n\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 7^2\textn\equiv 3,5,6\ \bmod\ 7 #\tau(n)\equiv\sigma_(n)\ \bmod\ 691. For prime, we have
  1. \tau(p)\equiv 0\ \bmod\ 23\text\left(\frac\right)=-1
  2. \tau(p)\equiv \sigma_(p)\ \bmod\ 23^2\text p\text a^2+23b^2
  3. \tau(p)\equiv -1\ \bmod\ 23\text.


Explicit formula

In 1975 Douglas Niebur proved an explicit formula for the Ramanujan tau function: :\tau(n)=n^4\sigma(n)-24\sum_^i^2(35i^2-52in+18n^2)\sigma(i)\sigma(n-i). This also shows that the tau function is always an integer.


Conjectures on ''τ''(''n'')

Suppose that is a weight- integer newform and the Fourier coefficients are integers. Consider the problem: : Given that does not have
complex multiplication In mathematics, complex multiplication (CM) is the theory of elliptic curves ''E'' that have an endomorphism ring larger than the integers. Put another way, it contains the theory of elliptic functions with extra symmetries, such as are visible wh ...
, do almost all primes have the property that ? Indeed, most primes should have this property, and hence they are called ''ordinary''. Despite the big advances by Deligne and Serre on Galois representations, which determine for coprime to , it is unclear how to compute . The only theorem in this regard is Elkies' famous result for modular elliptic curves, which guarantees that there are infinitely many primes such that , which thus are congruent to 0 modulo . There are no known examples of non-CM with weight greater than 2 for which for infinitely many primes (although it should be true for almost all ). There are also no known examples with for infinitely many . Some researchers had begun to doubt whether for infinitely many . As evidence, many provided Ramanujan's (case of weight 12). The only solutions up to 1010 to the equation are 2, 3, 5, 7, 2411, and . conjectured that for all , an assertion sometimes known as Lehmer's conjecture. Lehmer verified the conjecture for up to (Apostol 1997, p. 22). The following table summarizes progress on finding successively larger values of for which this condition holds for all .


Ramanujan's ''L''-function

Ramanujan's ''L''-function is defined by :L(s)=\sum_\frac if \Re s>6 and by
analytic continuation In complex analysis, a branch of mathematics, analytic continuation is a technique to extend the domain of definition of a given analytic function. Analytic continuation often succeeds in defining further values of a function, for example in a ...
otherwise. It satisfies the functional equation :\frac=\frac,\quad s\notin\mathbb_0^-, \,12-s\notin\mathbb_0^ and has the
Euler product In number theory, an Euler product is an expansion of a Dirichlet series into an infinite product indexed by prime numbers. The original such product was given for the sum of all positive integers raised to a certain power as proven by Leonhard Eu ...
:L(s)=\prod_\frac,\quad \Re s>7. Ramanujan conjectured that all nontrivial zeros of L have real part equal to 6.


Notes


References

* * * * * * * * * * * * *{{Citation , last=Wilton , first=J. R. , title=Congruence properties of Ramanujan's function τ(''n'') , year=1930 , journal=Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , volume=31 , pages=1–10 , doi=10.1112/plms/s2-31.1.1 Modular forms Multiplicative functions Srinivasa Ramanujan Zeta and L-functions