Synopsis
Four seniors at a large Toronto high school talk about what they are going to do next summer and beyond, not wanting to "waste" it like they did the year before. Mike is being pressured by his parents to go to university following graduation from high school, although Mike himself is unsure if that is what he wants to do. They try their hand at filmmaking, with mixed results. They talk about touring with their band, Arctic Madness, but eventually pack it in as they are not very good. They try setting up a commune near Timmins on a five-hundred-acre parcel of wilderness property which Mike has inherited for about four days. As the end of the school year approaches, their best ideas having been tried and rejected, the four come to a realization of what their future together actually holds.Cast
In addition, the cast includes Guy Sanvido, Petunia Cameron-Swayze, Buddy Sault, Ann Lantuch, Andy Melzer, Dan Evered, Clara Sarkozi, Ed McNamara, Diane Dewey, Linda Houston, Susan Conway, Carman Gallo, and David Yorston. This was the first film appearance for three of the leads, Mike Kukulewich, Peter Gross, and Susan Petrie.Themes
Focusing on the trip to the country, Ralph Lucas considers disillusionment to be the "overriding theme" as, "somewhat predictably, in the end the young people are dismayed to discover they are not as different as they would like to be." Geoff Pevere also focuses on that aspect of the story, the characters leaving the city for the "vast landscape, only to inevitably collide with their own delusions". John Hofsess saw ''Rip-Off'' as part of a larger trend in which the directors of teen movies shifted focus:By the time one reaches '' The Panic in Needle Park'', '' Dusty and Sweets McGee'', '' Bless the Beasts and Children'', and, in particular, Don Shebib's ''Rip-Off'', Clarke Mackey's ''The Only Thing You Know ''The Only Thing You Know'' is a Canadian drama film, directed by Clarke Mackey and released in 1971.Punishment Park'', it is clear that directors recognize that youth culture has curdled. For years everything shoddy, hypocritical and evil has been blamed on other (older) people. Now it's youth's turn to accept responsibility for the dreary mess of its own subculture.
Production
Background and writing
DirectorDonald Shebib Donald Everett "Don" Shebib (born 27 January 1938) is a Canadian film director. Shebib is a central figure in the development of English Canadian cinema who made several short documentaries for the National Film Board of Canada and CBC Televisi ...recounted in a 2013 interview how the distributor of his first feature, '' Goin' Down the Road'', "wanted to make a film about teenagers, so I just sat down and started to write it. It was very rushed." The film's working title was ''Mike and Sue''. In an interview which took place prior to the release of his later film, '' Between Friends'', Shebib was asked if he was consciously posing "socially-loaded questions", Shebib answered: "Partially, yeah. ''Rip-Off'' was one case where it was stronger." In the same interview, Shebib remarked: "Bill Fruet writes dreadful women", and that he had to "fight" with him to make Sue more "sensitive".
Filming
Wyndham Wise says the film was made on a strict budget with a "skeleton crew" of nine. CinematographerRichard Leiterman Richard Leiterman (March 7, 1935 – July 14, 2005) was a Canadian cinematographer, best known for documentary and feature film work in the 1960s and 1970s. His cinéma vérité, or direct camera, style helped define Canadian cinema at the time. ...said the film was a little over budget, but stayed on schedule. Leiterman originally made documentary films. He made the switch to dramatic films when he shot Shebib's previous film, the seminal '' Goin' Down the Road''; dramatic films were now his "primary professional domain", though since both he and Shebib had documentary backgrounds, this was reflected in how their first two feature films were made, more so with ''Goin' Down the Road'' than ''Rip-Off'', a film where they were both trying to do something neither of them had much experience with: a formal feature set-up: "I think we both learned a lot, I certainly did. And I'm anxious to correct the mistakes I made on that one." The film was shot on 35mm ( Kodak 5254), mainly in Toronto. Michael (Dunky)'s home is in theNorth York North York is one of the six administrative districts of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is located directly north of York, Old Toronto and East York, between Etobicoke to the west and Scarborough to the east. As of the 2016 Census, it had a popu ...suburb of Don Mills, while the plot of land left him by his grandfather is near Timmins. All the locations were real, something Leiterman did not care for because of the tendency to want to rush. Technical problems associated with location shooting involved whether and how to light scenes, particularly for those filmed with ahigh speed camera A high-speed camera is a device capable of capturing moving images with exposures of less than 1/1,000 second or frame rates in excess of 250 fps. It is used for recording fast-moving objects as photographic images onto a storage medium. After r ...for slow motion in a gymnasium: "There just wasn't enough light to shoot high speed, without putting in some fill light." Leiterman said he learned a lot making ''Rip-Off'' and he would never do it all the way he had done it again.
Music
Around the time of composing the score for ''Rip-Off'' with Gene Martynec, composer Murray McLauchlan released his first album, ''Songs from the Street'' ( True North Records) in the summer of 1971.
Release
''Rip-Off'' was released on 30 September 1971, and in October 1972 in the United States.
Home media
''Rip-Off'' was released on VHS in the United States under the title ''Virgin Territory''.
Reception
Commercial performance
The film was a commercial failure.
Critical response
Contemporary
John Hofsess faulted the film for being less funny than a comedy is supposed to be, and "while some good-natured spoofing of the intense, humorless youth scene is needed, the fault here is that acting as comic foils the characters seem even dumber than usual. ... The film is so uneven — annoyingly cute and predictable in one scene, genuinely funny and original the next — that it seems slapdash." He praises the twenty-year-old Susan Petrie, who makes a "smashing debut" and steals scenes from every other actor, and proceeds to analyse both what works in the film and the contemporary audience response to similar films:Over a period of about five years Shebib evolved a documentary style suffused with a wry, ironic humanism. It's a superb style for needling the sacred cows of the establishment and the sanctimonious bull of counter-culture groups. The best scenes in ''Rip-Off'' are done in that style. Parents aren't depicted as shrill, neurotic harpies and young people aren't given a self-congratulatory snow job. But ''Rip-Off'' is engaged in a thankless task. Audiences at the recent Canadian Film Awards guffawed every time a screen character said "groovy," "far out" or "out of sight" (nine of the 13 features shown had such a character, usually the film's token pothead). They weren't laughing with discernment at bad scripting. It was the hypocritical laughter of people who found only the quaintness of yesterday's slanguage ridiculous. It illustrates the danger to any film maker who bows to trendy things: Exploit the public's infirmities and the public will revenge itself.Wyndham Wise described the film as "a light, inoffensive comedy", the first half of which "holds together fairly well and has some fine comic scenes," but then it "becomes very episodic, almost to the point of boredom towards the end; it doesn't have much depth and if there is a point, it gets lost somewhere in the middle." Shebib himself thought the film "didn't work" at least in terms of asking social questions "because the vehicle I used wasn't right." Leiterman conceded that the film was not flawless, "in either direction or in script. Or in cinematography. It's not a mind blowing film. It wasn't intended to be. It was dealing with many problems very lightly, but leaving a lot up to the audience's imagination to carry it on further. It was presenting a lot of problems that kids are up against now, and I think we did that fairly well.
Retrospective
''Rip-Off'' has been rated by Geoff Pevere among English Canada's "most visually impressive features" of the 1970s and 1980s. Ralph Lucas, publisher of Northern Stars - Canadian Movie Database, suggests that the film "works better now" as a piece ofnostalgia Nostalgia is a sentimentality for the past, typically for a period or place with happy personal associations. The word ''nostalgia'' is a learned formation of a Greek language, Greek compound, consisting of (''nóstos''), meaning "homecoming", ...than at the time of its release: "Back then, some of the scenes were almost unwatchable, probably due to the embarrassment of the audience recognizing themselves up there on the screen." Justin Decloux agrees, calling it "a before it’s time film", a "high minded" '' Porky's'' which may be "a little too earnest at times". '' TV Guide'' gives the film 3 stars out of 5: "A good understanding of teenagers' problems is displayed as the film documents their search to find something with which to identify and their dissatisfaction at discovering they're really not so different from everyone else." It features as one of Greg Klymkiw's 101 best Canadian films.
References
External links
* *
Rip-Off
' on Northern Stars (Canadian Movie Database) {{Donald Shebib 1971 films Canadian teen comedy films English-language Canadian films Slice of life films Films directed by Donald Shebib 1970s English-language films 1970s Canadian films