In the United States courts, renewed judgment as a matter of law is a party's second chance at a
judgment as a matter of law
A motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) is a motion made by a party, during trial, claiming the opposing party has insufficient evidence to reasonably support its case. JMOL is also known as a directed verdict, which it has replaced i ...
(JMOL) motion. Renewed JMOL is decided after a jury has returned its verdict, and is a motion to have that verdict altered. In US federal courts this procedure has replaced
judgment notwithstanding the verdict
Judgment notwithstanding the verdict, also called judgment ''non obstante veredicto'', or JNOV, is a type of judgment as a matter of law that is sometimes rendered at the conclusion of a jury trial. In U.S. federal civil court cases, the term has b ...
(JNOV) through Rule 50 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The same standards as JMOL apply. The difference is that renewed JMOL can only be raised if JMOL had been raised before the jury began deliberations.
Seventh Amendment due process concerns demand this formality, as decided by the
United States Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that involve a point o ...
in ''Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman'', 295 U.S. 654 (1935).
Judgment (law)
Civil procedure
{{US-law-stub