Relational (grammar)
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
linguistics Linguistics is the scientific study of human language. It is called a scientific study because it entails a comprehensive, systematic, objective, and precise analysis of all aspects of language, particularly its nature and structure. Linguis ...
, relational grammar (RG) is a
syntactic In linguistics, syntax () is the study of how words and morphemes combine to form larger units such as phrases and sentences. Central concerns of syntax include word order, grammatical relations, hierarchical sentence structure (constituency), ...
theory which argues that primitive
grammatical relations In linguistics, grammatical relations (also called grammatical functions, grammatical roles, or syntactic functions) are functional relationships between constituents in a clause. The standard examples of grammatical functions from traditional gra ...
provide the ideal means to state syntactic rules in universal terms. Relational grammar began as an alternative to transformational grammar.


Grammatical relations hierarchy

In relational grammar, constituents that serve as the arguments to predicates are numbered in what is called the grammatical relations (GR) hierarchy. This numbering system corresponds loosely to the notions of
subject Subject ( la, subiectus "lying beneath") may refer to: Philosophy *''Hypokeimenon'', or ''subiectum'', in metaphysics, the "internal", non-objective being of a thing **Subject (philosophy), a being that has subjective experiences, subjective cons ...
,
direct object In linguistics, an object is any of several types of arguments. In subject-prominent, nominative-accusative languages such as English, a transitive verb typically distinguishes between its subject and any of its objects, which can include but ...
and indirect object. The numbering scheme is subject → (1), direct object → (2) and indirect object → (3). Other constituents (such as oblique,
genitive In grammar, the genitive case (abbreviated ) is the grammatical case that marks a word, usually a noun, as modifying another word, also usually a noun—thus indicating an attributive relationship of one noun to the other noun. A genitive can al ...
, and object of comparative) are called ''nonterms'' (N). The predicate is marked (P). According to
Geoffrey K. Pullum Geoffrey Keith Pullum (; born 8 March 1945) is a British and American linguist specialising in the study of English. He is Professor Emeritus of General Linguistics at the University of Edinburgh. Pullum is a co-author of ''The Cambridge Gram ...
(1977), the GR hierarchy directly corresponds to the
accessibility hierarchy A relative clause is a clause that modifies a noun or noun phraseRodney D. Huddleston, Geoffrey K. Pullum, ''A Student's Introduction to English Grammar'', CUP 2005, p. 183ff. and uses some grammatical device to indicate that one of the arguments ...
: A schematic representation of a clause in this formalism might look like:


Other features

* Strata * Chomage (see chômeur) * Predicate
valence Valence or valency may refer to: Science * Valence (chemistry), a measure of an element's combining power with other atoms * Degree (graph theory), also called the valency of a vertex in graph theory * Valency (linguistics), aspect of verbs rel ...


Universals

One of the components of RG theory is a set of linguistic universals stated in terms of the numbered roles presented above. Such a universal is the ''stratal uniqueness law'', which states that there can be at most ''one'' 1, 2, and 3 per stratum. Pullum (1977) lists three more universals: # The NP constituents of a clause are linearized in their GR hierarchy order, from left to right. # The verb of a clause may be placed in #: (a) initial position in all clauses, #: (b) second position in all clauses, or #: (c) final position in all clauses. # If placement of the verb leaves the subject NP noninitial, the subject may be assigned final position. However, Pullum formulated these universals before the discovery of languages with object-initial word order. After the discovery of such languages, he retracted his prior statements.


See also

* Arc pair grammar * Role and reference grammar


References


Sources

*Johnson, David E. (1974–1979). ''Toward a Theory of Relationally-based Grammar.'' Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics Series, ed. Jorge Hankamer. NY: Garland Publishing, Inc. *Johnson, David E. and Paul M. Postal (1980). ''Arc Pair Grammar.'' Princeton: PUP. *Newmeyer, Frederick (1980). Linguistics in America. New York: Academic Press. *Postal, Paul M. (1974). ''On Raising - An Inquiry into One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications.'' Mass.: MIT Press.


Further reading

* Blake, Barry J. (1990). ''Relational grammar''. London: Routledge. * * Perlmutter, David M. (1980). Relational grammar. In E. A. Moravcsik & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), ''Syntax and semantics: Current approaches to syntax'' (Vol. 13, pp. 195–229). New York: Academic Press. * Perlmutter, David M. (Ed.). (1983).
Studies in relational grammar 1
'. Chicago: Chicago University Press. * Perlmutter, David M.; & Rosen, Carol G. (Eds.). (1984).
Studies in relational grammar 2
'. Chicago: Chicago University Press. * Postal, Paul M.; & Joseph, Brian D. (Eds.). (1990).
Studies in relational grammar 3
'. Chicago: Chicago University Press.


External links


RG SIL bibliography
Grammar frameworks {{syntax-stub