Powell V. Georgia
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Powell v. State of Georgia'', S98A0755, 270 Ga. 327, 510 S.E. 2d 18 (1998), was a decision of the Supreme Court of Georgia in the U.S. state of Georgia that overturned its law against sodomy within the state. The Court ruled that the Georgia Constitution granted a right to privacy, and that outlawing oral or anal sex between consenting adults was a violation of the state constitution, thus deeming it "unconstitutional". While the plaintiff in ''Powell'' had been engaged in heterosexual sex, the overturning of the anti sodomy law also decriminalized same-sex sexual activity within the state of Georgia.


Background

Anthony Powell was charged with a complaint in which he had performed non-consensual oral sex upon his wife's 17-year-old niece in his house. The jury acquitted him of the non-consensual portion of the complaint, but convicted him of consensual sodomy. In its appeal, the defense argued the statute was unconstitutional; the state argued that a conviction such as this was explicitly upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of '' Bowers v. Hardwick'', 478 U.S. 186 (1986). In ''Bowers'', the Attorney General of Georgia had conceded that the sodomy law could not be applied to married heterosexuals, given the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in '' Griswold v. Connecticut''. Justice
John Paul Stevens John Paul Stevens (April 20, 1920 – July 16, 2019) was an American lawyer and jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1975 to 2010. At the time of his retirement, he was the second-oldes ...
had observed in his ''Bowers'' dissent that ''
Eisenstadt v. Baird ''Eisenstadt v. Baird'', 405 U.S. 438 (1972), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that established the right of unmarried people to possess contraception on the same basis as married couples. The Court struck down a Massachusetts la ...
'' had extended ''Griswold'' to unmarried heterosexuals, so the sodomy law should not apply to unmarried homosexuals either.


Decision of the court

The Georgia Supreme Court struck down the sodomy statute by a vote of 6–1. The Court found that the individual's right to privacy in the Georgia Constitution are stronger and broader than those in the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment. The majority noted that "privacy rights protected by the U.S. Constitution are not at issue in this case," while the dissenting justice cited ''Bowers'' extensively. Powell's conviction was overturned.


Impact

Although this case involved heterosexual activity, the decision overturned the state's sodomy law and had the effect of making
homosexual Homosexuality is romantic attraction, sexual attraction, or sexual behavior between members of the same sex or gender. As a sexual orientation, homosexuality is "an enduring pattern of emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attractions" to peop ...
sexual activity legal in the State of Georgia. Sodomy laws were overturned nationwide five years later, when ''
Lawrence v. Texas ''Lawrence v. Texas'', 539 U.S. 558 (2003), is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that most sanctions of criminal punishment for consensual, adult non- procreative sexual activity (commonly referred to as so ...
'' (2003) overruled '' Bowers v. Hardwick''.


See also

*
Sex-related court cases The United States Supreme Court and various U.S. state courts have decided several cases regarding pornography, sexual activity, and reproductive rights. The trend has been one of courts striking down states' attempts to regulate sex. The followi ...
* LGBT rights in Georgia


References


External links

* Georgia (U.S. state) case law Legal history of Georgia (U.S. state) 1998 in United States case law LGBT in Georgia (U.S. state) 1998 in Georgia (U.S. state) Cunnilingus {{US-case-law-stub