Polypterus Sudanensis

''Polypterus'' is a genus of freshwater fish in the bichir family ( Polypteridae) of order Polypteriformes. The type species is the Nile bichir (''P. bichir''). Fish in this genus live in various areas in Africa. ''Polypterus'' is the only known vertebrate to have lungs, but no trachea.

The etymology of the genus name derives from a combination of the Greek prefix πολυ-, ''poly-'' (many) and the root word πτερον, ''pteron'' (wing or fin) – "many fins".

Recoil aspiration

In shallow water, ''Polypterus'' inhales primarily through its spiracle (blowhole). Exhalation is powered by muscles in the torso. During exhalation, the bony scales in the upper chest become indented. When the muscles are relaxed, the bony scales spring back into position, generating negative pressure within the torso, resulting in a rapid intake of air through the spiracle. The air is nearly sufficient to fill the lungs. This is followed by one cycle of buccal (mouth) pumping, which "tops off" the lungs, with the surplus air from the buccal pumping process discharged through the pharynx. According to one hypothesis, Devonian tetrapods may have inhaled in this way.

Discovery

''Polypterus'' was discovered, described, and named in 1802 by Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. It is a genus of 10 green to yellow-brown species. Naturalists were unsure whether to regard it as a fish or an amphibian. If it were a fish, what type was it: bony, cartilaginous, or lungfish?Hall (2001)

Some regarded ''Polypterus'' as a living fossil, part of the missing link between fishes and amphibians, helping to show how fish fins had evolved to become paired limbs.

In 1861, Thomas Huxley created the order Crossopterygii to house animals, fossil and living, that possessed lungs and fleshy pectoral fins with lobes. He placed ''Polypterus'' and '' Calamoichthys'' within this order, allocating them to a new tribe, Polypterini, which he created especially for them. The weight of Huxley's authority allowed this allocation to last in textbooks and lectures long after it had been disproved.

In the 1870s and 1880s, Francis Balfour and his students had shown that embryology could help to answer questions about the evolution of species. No one had studied the embryology of ''Polypterus''. Someone who could do this might prove the “missing link” theory and be greatly honoured, but it could be a dangerous quest. The only breeding ''Polypterus'' specimens were in swampy parts of African rivers. Africa was a turbulent place and swamps were rich breeding grounds for mosquitoes carrying malaria.

Two men, Nathan Harrington and John Samuel Budgett, attempted to answer this question by making repeated expeditions to Africa. Harrington failed on his first attempt in 1898 and died early on his second in 1899 before he could reach his destination. Budgett failed in 1898/9, 1900, and 1902. He finally succeeded in 1903, but died of blackwater fever shortly after his return to England. He left excellent samples and drawings, but his only writing was a diary. Consequently, his results on ''Polypterus'' were written up and published by his friend John Graham Kerr.

Drawing on this work, in 1907, E. S. Goodrich reported to the British Association the then current state of evidence 'against' ''Polypterus'' being a crossopterygian, placing it within the palaeoniscids, the most primitive actinopterygians.

Much later, in 1946, Romer, confirmed this view, but he also wrote, "The weight of Huxley's 861opinion is a heavy one, and even today many a text continues to cite ''Polypterus'' as a crossopterygian and it is so described in many a classroom, although students of fish evolution have realized the falsity of this position for many years. ... ''Polypterus'' ... is not a crossopterygian, but an actinopterygian, and hence can tell us nothing about crossopterygian anatomy and embryology."

Hall (2001), relying on Patterson (1982) and Noack ''et al.'' (1996), writes, "Phylogenetic analyses using both morphological and molecular data affirm ''Polypterus'' as a living stem actinopterygian." Research is ongoing. Most of the conclusions drawn by Kerr from Budgett's specimens have been confirmed, but many questions remain.

''Polypterus'' has rarely been bred in captivity. The first success was that of ''Polypterus senegalus'' by Arnoult in 1964, a species spawned repeatedly since (see Hartl, 1981; Bartsch and Gemballa, 1992; Bartsch et al., 1997 and Schugardt, 1997).

Shortly after Arnoult's success, a second species, ''Polypterus ornatipinnis'', was spawned by Armbrust for the first time (1966 and 1973) and bred subsequently by Azuma in 1986; Wolf, 1992; Bartsch and Britz, 1996. The third species successfully spawned in captivity was ''Polypterus endlicheri'' by Azuma in 1995.

Zoo Basel have been successful in breeding ''Polypterus'' in captivity. In December 2005, several eggs were laid, and at the beginning of 2006, six young hatched. Within two months, they reached 10 cm (about 4 in).

In 2014 researchers at McGill University (published in the journal Nature) turned to ''Polypterus'' to help show what might have happened when fish first attempted to walk out of the water. The team of researchers raised juvenile ''Polypterus'' on land for nearly a year, with the aim of revealing how these 'terrestrialized' fish looked and moved differently.

Species

* ''Polypterus ansorgii'' Boulenger, 1910 (Guinean bichir)
* '' Polypterus bichir'' Lacépède, 1803 (Nile bichir)
** ''P. b. lapradei'' Steindachner, 1869 (junior synonym)
* ''Polypterus congicus'' Boulenger, 1898 (Congo bichir)
* '' Polypterus delhezi'' Boulenger, 1899 (Barred bichir)
* '' Polypterus endlicherii'' Heckel, 1847
* ''Polypterus mokelembembe'' Schliewen & Schäfer, 2006 (Mokèlé-mbèmbé bichir)
* ''Polypterus ornatipinnis'' Boulenger, 1902 (Ornate bichir)
* '' Polypterus palmas'' Ayres, 1850
*''Polypterus polli'' J. P. Gosse, 1988 (Poll's bichir)
* ''Polypterus retropinnis'' Vaillant, 1899 (West African bichir)
* '' Polypterus senegalus'' Cuvier, 1829 (Gray bichir)
* '' Polypterus teugelsi'' Britz, 2004 (Cross River bichir)
* ''Polypterus weeksii'' Boulenger, 1898 (Mottled bichir)

References

Sources

Goodrich, E. S. (1908). ''On the systematic position of Polypterus. Report of the 77th Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science'' (1907): 545-546. Quoted by Hall

Hall, B. K. (2001) John Samuel Budgett (1872-1904): ''In Pursuit of Polypterus'', BioScience, Vol. 51, No. 5 (May, 2001), pp. 399–407

Kerr, J.G. (1907), ''The development of Polypterus senegalus Cuv.'', Pages 195-290 in Kerr, J.G., (ed. 1907), ''The Work of John Samuel Budgett, Balfour Student of the University of Cambridge: Being a Collection of His Zoological Papers, together with a Biographical Sketch by A . E. Shipley, F.R.S., and Contributions by Richard Assheton, Edward J.Bles, Edward T. Browne, J. Herbert Budgett and J. Graham Kerr.'' Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

Noack K, Zardoya R, Meyer A. 1996. ''The complete mitochondrial DNA sequence of the bichir (Polypterusor natipinnis), a basal ray-finned fish: Ancient establishment of the consensus vertebrate gene order''. Genetics 144:1165-1180, cited by Hall

Patterson C. (1982). ''Morphology and interrelationships of primitive actinopterygian fishes''. American Zoologist 22: 241-260, cited by Hall.

Romer, A S. (1946). ''The early evolution of fishes'', Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 33-69, cited by Hall

{{Taxonbar, from=Q1303295

Polypteridae
Taxa named by Bernard Germain de Lacépède
Freshwater fish genera