Palaeochiropteryx NT

''Palaeochiropteryx'' ( ) is an extinct genus of bat from the Middle Eocene of Europe and North America. It contains three very similar species – ''Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon'' and ''Palaeochiropteryx spiegeli'', both from the famous Messel Pit of Germany, as well as ''Palaeochiropteryx sambuceus'' from the Sheep Pass Formation (Nevada, United States). They are usually found complete and exceptionally preserved, even retaining the outlines of their fur, ears, and wing membranes.

They are one of the oldest bats known, existing around 48 million years ago. Despite this, they were already quite advanced, showing evidence of the ability to hunt by echolocation like modern insect-eating bats.

''Palaeochiropteryx'' were small bats, with a wingspan between . Their wings were short but broad, indicating an adaptation for slow but highly maneuverable flight beneath forest canopies and among dense vegetation. They preyed mostly on moths and caddisflies and were probably nocturnal.

Along with the contemporary ''Hassianycteris'', ''Palaeochiropteryx'' is among the first fossil mammals to have its coloration determined through analysis of melanosomes.

Discovery and classification

Fossils of both species of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' were first recovered from the Messel Pit, near the village of Messel, Germany in 1917. They were described and named by the Swiss people, Swiss naturalist Pierre Revilliod. He placed them under their own Family (biology), family – Palaeochiropterygidae. The name ''Palaeochiropteryx'' means "Ancient hand-wing", from Greek language, Greek wikt:paleo-, παλαιός (''palaios'', "old"), wikt:chiro-, χείρ (''kheir'', "hand"), and wikt:πτέρυξ, πτέρυξ (''pteruks'', "wing"). There are two major reasons as to why the discovery of these fossils is of importance and value; (1) this discover alters perceived relationships among extant forms at a few poorly supported nodes; and (2) the newly found fossils affect some character polarities (slightly changing tree topology), and also changes the levels at which transformations appear to apply (altering perceived support for some clades).

The two species have only been found at Messel. They are quite common and account for three quarters of all bat fossils found there, with ''Archaeonycteris'', ''Hassianycetris'', and ''Tachypteron'' making up the rest. Like other fossils from the Type locality (geology), locality, they are often found in remarkable states of preservation, retaining traces of fur, stomach contents, wing membranes, and even ears. The two species belonging to the genus are the following:
*''Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon'' Revilliod, 1917
*''Palaeochiropteryx spiegeli'' Revilliod, 1917

In 1980, their parent taxon, Palaeochiropterygidae, was merged with Archaeonycteridae by the paleontologists Björn Kurtén and Elaine Anderson. Authorities specializing in bat fossils, however, maintain the distinction between the two families.

The Messel Pit Formation (stratigraphy), formation dates from the Lutetian Age (geology), age of the Middle Eocene. Between 48.6 ± 0.2 and 40.4 ± 0.2 million years ago.

Along with ''Onychonycteris'', ''Icaronycteris'', ''Hassianycetris'', and ''Archaeonycteris''; members of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' are among the oldest known bats. All are identifiable by more or less complete skeletons. While there are fossils of other older bats such as ''Australonycteris'', these are only recognisable from fragmented examples. Close relatives of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' include the Middle Eocene ''Cecilionycteris'', ''Lapichiropteryx'' and ''Microchiropteryx'', all recovered from partial remains from Germany, China, and India, respectively.

Description

''Palaeochiropteryx'' differed little from modern bats, a surprising fact given their relative age. ''Palaeochiropteryx'' had wings formed from enlarged hands, even though their wings were less advanced than the modern bats. For example, they still possessed a claw in the index finger.

Both ''P. tupaiodon'' and ''P. spiegeli'' were small bats. ''P. spiegeli'' is slightly larger than ''P. tupaiodon''. ''P. tupaiodon'' had an estimated body mass of and a forearm length of . ''P. spiegeli'' was slightly larger and heavier, with an estimated body mass of and a forearm length of . They had wingspans between in length.

The complete dentition of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' is known. They had 38 teeth, composed of four upper and six lower incisors, four Canine tooth, canine teeth, twelve premolars, and twelve molar (tooth), molars. Their dental formula is the same as at least three living families of bats, such as bats from the genus ''Myotis''.

Analysis of melanosomes preserved in the hairs of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' specimens suggests that they contained phaeomelanin, which would have given it a brown colour in life like many living bat species.

Paleobiology and paleoecology

Messel Pit (known in German language, German as ''Grube Messel'') is one of the most famous and richest List of fossil sites, fossil sites of the world. The site is renowned for the quality of Fossil preservation, preservation in the fossils found. Preserved in very fragile bituminous shale, they often retain exquisite details of the soft parts of animals and plants. As its name suggests, the pit is a dry depression about deep; the surface is around above sea level. It covers an area approximately by .

48 million years ago, the pit was a small but very deep lake, originally at least deep. It was located around 10° south of its current location in a tropical and subtropical Eocene Europe. Messel Pit was volcanic in origin, probably a caldera created by a massive volcanic eruption. It remained Geology, geologically and Tectonics, tectonically active during the Eocene, intermittently releasing puffs of poisonous volcanic gases. A virtually Water stagnation, stagnant lake, its low oxygen levels enabled the types of preservation found in its fossils.

Messel pit was surrounded by a lush tropical jungle ecosystem teeming with wildlife. Among these were several bat species, including ''Palaeochiropteryx''. Fossils of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' (particularly ''Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon'') occur in great abundance in the pit. They account for three-fourths of all recovered bat fossils in the area.

The fossils recovered are usually of healthy adults with full stomachs, making the reasons why they ended up at the bottom of a lake a bit of a mystery. They may have been snagged or poisoned by thick algal mats on the surface of the lake as they swooped down to drink. Or they may have been knocked out midair by poisonous fumes rising from the lake and subsequently drowned.

The small bodies of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' coupled with their relatively broad wingspan indicate that they may have been low level flyers, much like some modern bats with the same body structure. They specialized in hunting close to the ground, beneath the jungle Canopy (biology), canopy and among vegetation unlike other bats found in Messel Pit which flew at higher altitudes (an early evidence of niche partitioning). They had low wing loading and low Aspect ratio (wing), aspect ratios, suggesting that they were relatively slow flyers but were able to maneuver in midair quickly – essential for avoiding collisions with the numerous obstacles near the forest floor. This fact may have made them especially vulnerable to the poisonous gases of the former Messel lake, explaining the abundance of their fossils.

The shape of their teeth and the stomach contents of the numerous extremely well preserved fossils of the Messel Pit indicate that ''Palaeochiropteryx'' were insectivorous. ''P. tupaiodon'' fed almost exclusively on (presumably slow-moving) moths of the primitive Microlepidoptera family. ''P. spiegeli'', on the other hand, also consumed Caddisfly, caddisflies (Trichoptera) in addition to moths. Most members of those insect families are active at night, giving a strong indication that ''Palaeochiropteryx'' were also nocturnal, or at best, active during twilight (crepuscular).

Echolocation

From the results of Radiography, radiographic analysis, ''Palaeochiropteryx'' (as well as ''Archaeonycteris'' and ''Icaronycteris'') all have enlarged cochleae relative to the size of their skulls. They are still smaller than that of modern echolocating insectivorous bats (Microchiroptera) but they are already larger than that of modern non-echolocating fruit-eating bats (Megachiroptera). Along with their known diets and habits, this is a clear evidence that ''Palaeochiropteryx'' was very much capable of echolocation like modern microchiropterans.

Taxonomy and phylogeny

The fossil record of bats extends back at least to the early Eocene, and chiropteran fossils are known from all continents except Antarctica. ''Icaronycteris'', ''Archaeonycteris'', ''Hassianycetris'', and ''Palaeochiropteryx'', unlike most other fossil bats, have not been referred to any extant family or superfamily. These Eocene taxa are known from exceptionally well-preserved fossils, and they have long formed a basis for reconstructing the early evolutionary history of Chiroptera.

Smith (1977) suggested that these taxa represent an extinct clade of early microchiropterans which he dubbed Palaeochiropterygoidea. In contrast, Van Valen (1979) argued that these fossil forms are representatives of Eochiroptera, a primitive grade ancestral to both Megachiroptera and Microchiroptera; modern researchers, however, consider this clade to be obsolete.Nancy B. Simmons; Erik R. Seiffert; Gregg F. Gunnell (2016). "A New Family of Large Omnivorous Bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from the Late Eocene of the Fayum Depression, Egypt, with Comments on Use of the Name “Eochiroptera”". ''American Museum Novitates'' 3857: 1–43. doi:10.1206/3857.1. Novacek (1987) reanalyzed morphology of ''Icaronycteris'' and ''Palaeochiropteryx'' and concluded that they are more closely related to Microchroptera than to Megachiroptera. Most recently, Simmons and Geisler (1998) found that ''Icaronycteris'', ''Archaeonycteris'', ''Hassianycteris'', and ''Palaeochiropteryx'' represent a series of consecutive sister-taxa to extant microchiropteran bats.

Below is the phylogenetic tree from Simmons and Geisler (1998) showing the proposed relationships of ''Palaeochiropteryx'' (in bold) with other extinct genera and with extant bats.

See also

*Animal echolocation
*Bat wing development
*Flying primates theory

References

External links

{{Taxonbar, from=Q1440254

Eocene bats
Prehistoric bat genera
Eocene mammals of Europe
Fossil taxa described in 1917