The Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) is an

XML Extensible Markup Language (XML) is a markup language and file format for storing, transmitting, and reconstructing arbitrary data. It defines a set of rules for encoding documents in a format that is both human-readable and machine-readable ...

-based bibliographic description schema developed by the

United States The United States of America (U.S.A. or USA), commonly known as the United States (U.S. or US) or America, is a country primarily located in North America. It consists of 50 states, a federal district, five major unincorporated territori ...

Library of Congress The Library of Congress (LOC) is the research library that officially serves the United States Congress and is the ''de facto'' national library of the United States. It is the oldest federal cultural institution in the country. The library ...

' Network Development and Standards Office. MODS was designed as a compromise between the complexity of the

MARC Marc or MARC may refer to: People * Marc (given name), people with the first name * Marc (surname), people with the family name Acronyms * MARC standards, a data format used for library cataloging, * MARC Train, a regional commuter rail system o ...

format used by libraries and the extreme simplicity of

Dublin Core 220px, Logo image of DCMI, which formulates Dublin Core The Dublin Core, also known as the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES), is a set of fifteen "core" elements (properties) for describing resources. This fifteen-element Dublin Core has ...

metadata.

About MODS

History and development

The Library of Congress' Network Development and MARC Standards Office, with interested experts, developed the Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) in 2002 for a bibliographic element set that may be used for a variety of purposes, and particularly for library applications. As an XML schema it is intended to be able to carry selected data from existing MARC 21 records as well as to enable the creation of original resource description records. It includes a subset of MARC fields and uses language-based tags rather than numeric ones, in some cases regrouping elements from the MARC 21 bibliographic format. MODS was first announced for trial use in June 2002. Since January 4, 2018 it is at version 3.7. The number of users of MODS is unknown. Implementers are encouraged to register their uses of MODS in th
implementation registry
on the official MODS website. To date there are about 35 projects listed in the registry, although it is assumed that many others are making use of the standard. Users are primarily operating in the area of

digital libraries A digital library, also called an online library, an internet library, a digital repository, or a digital collection is an online database of digital objects that can include text, still images, audio, video, digital documents, or other digital m ...

, and some of the registered uses are in digital library projects at the

Relationship to MARC

The MODS record has been designed to carry key data elements from the

record but does not define all of the MARC fields and does not use the field and subfield tagging from the MARC standard. There are data elements in MODS that are not compatible with the MARC record so there is some loss translating from MARC to MODS and from MODS to MARC. There is no commitment on the part of the Library of Congress to maintain compatibility between the two metadata formats beyond what is convenient to the community of MODS users. The Library of Congress maintains crosswalks in XSLT format for mapping from MARC to MODS, and from MODS to MARC.

Relationship to Dublin Core and qualified Dublin Core

Dublin Core is a simple schema. MODS is far more complex. The Library of Congress maintains crosswalks in XSLT format for mapping from Dublin Core to MODS, and from MODS to Dublin Core. However, no crosswalks are available for mapping between qualified Dublin Core and MODS.

Advantages

The use of MODS provides several advantages compared to other metadata schemas: * High compatibility with existing resource descriptions * Less detail than MARC so various internal record element sets can be mapped to MODS * Item descriptions from outside in DC and other simpler formats can be mapped and enhanced

Maintenance board

Revisions to the schema are suggested and discussed on th
MODS listserv
and approved by the MODS Editorial Committee. The MODS/MADS Editorial Committee is an international group of volunteers responsible for maintaining editorial control over MODS and MADS and their accompanying documentation as well as for the MODS and MADS XML schemas. The Library of Congress carries out the application of approved changes to the schema and maintains the official web site for the standard. There is no formal standards body involved in the MODS schema at this time.

References

External links

* {{Official website, https://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/ Bibliography file formats Library cataloging and classification Metadata standards