Myrtle (sternwheeler)

''Myrtle'' was a steamboat built in 1909 for service on the Coquille River and its tributaries, in Oregon. The ability of this small vessel to reach remote locations on the river system was cited many years later as evidence in support of the important legal concept of navigability.State of Oregon, Dept. of State Lands, ''Report and Recommendations on the Navigable Waters of Oregon'' (Jan. 1983), at pages 38-53..
/ref>

This steamboat should not be confused with a somewhat larger vessel, also named ''Myrtle'', which was built in 1908 at Prosper, Oregon, but which was home-ported much further north, at Astoria.

Construction

''Myrtle'' was built at Myrtle Point, Oregon, in 1909 for service on the Coquille River with the Myrtle Point Transportation Company.Newell, Gordon R., ''H.W. McCurdy Maritime History of the Pacific Northwest'', Superior (1966), at pages 162, 242, 327, and 484. The steamer was long, with a beam of and depth of hold of . U.S. Treasury Dept., Statistics Bureau, ''Annual List of Merchant Vessels'' (for year ending June 30, 1911)'', at page 253.
/ref> The overall size of the vessel was 36 gross and 29 registered tons. ''Myrtle'' engines generated 20 horsepower. Total crew specified in the U.S. steamship registry was two. The vessel was assigned U.S. registry no. 206743.

Placed into service

On Monday, September 13, 1909, ''Myrtle'' was brought to Coquille for inspection.''Coos Bay Times'', September 17, 1909, page 2, col. 3.
/ref> Some minor changes were anticipated, such as enlarging of the vessels wheel. Once these were effected, ''Myrtle'' owners, Captain Panter, and, from Myrtle Point, Engineer Kimes, planned to place the vessel on the run from Myrtle Point to Coquille, replacing the steamer ''Echo'', which needed to be withdrawn from service for repairs.

Upper river navigation

On account of its small size, ''Myrtle'' was able to reach the extreme reaches of navigable waters on the Coquille River system.Farnell, James E., "Coos and Coquille Rivers Navigability Studies", State of Oregon, Division of State Lands (Nov. 1979).
/ref> In December 1911, ''Myrtle'', which normally ran between Coquille City and Myrtle Point, was able to reach Gravelford on the north fork of the Coquille River, at river mile 10, meaning 10 miles up river from the confluence of the north and south forks just downriver from Myrtle Point. In February 1918, ''Myrtle'' reached Fox Bridge, at river mile 14.3.

On the east fork of the Coquille River, which begins at river mile 10, that is, approximately Gravelford, ''Myrtle'' was able, in February 1918, to navigate to river mile 1.5 to carry a load of hay to the Weekly ranch.

The south fork of the Coquille River begins just below Myrtle Point and then continues in a general direction east. In December 1912, on the south fork of the Coquille, ''Myrtle'' was able to travel to river mile 10 on the south fork to pick up a load of dairy products from a creamery at Broadbent, Oregon.

In the 1970s and early 1980s, the operations of ''Myrtle'' were analyzed in terms of whether they, in conjunction with other evidence, rendered the tributaries of the Coquille River navigable and thus by law making them subject to the ownership of the State of Oregon. ''Myrtle'' single trip to the creamery at Broadbent was found, by the report submitted to the state legislature, not itself sufficient evidence that the south fork of the Coquille was navigable.

Stranding and court case

On the night of October 7, 1913, ''Myrtle'' and the sternwheeler ''Dora'' were pulled away from their mooring and severely damaged.''Myrtle Point Trans. Co. vs. Port of Coquille'', 86 Or. 311, 168 Pac. Rptr. 625 (1918).
/ref> Myrtle Point Transportation Company, the owner of the two vessels, sued the Port of Coquille for damages, alleging that slashings left up river had backed up the flow of water, so with the first rain a surge had come downriver, washing away the boom to which the boats had been moored, and depositing them on a jetty far downriver."Myrtle Point Transportation Gets $1,750 -- Port of Coquille Blamed for Putting Brush in River Which Resulted in Damage to Boats", ''Coos Bay Times, June 15, 1915, page 1, col. 4.
/ref>

In 1915 the case came to trial before the Coos County Circuit Court, with Judge John S. Coke presiding. Trial took over three days and 41 witnesses testified. One witness who had seen the boom torn away stated that "the brush came down the river with such force and so high that it brushed the county bridge, 35 feet above the water and shook it." The transportation company claimed losses of $2,500, representing $1,000 in damage to the boats, $800 in repairs, and $700 in lost revenues from the boats when they were taken from their run.

The Port of Coquille alleged that the milling company's boom was too far out in the stream and that the boat company had been negligent in mooring their boats to the boom. The port also claimed the boat company was negligent by not posting a night watchman on the boats, and that had steam been kept up, the boats could have avoided being stranded on the jetty. The port also claimed that the lumber company's boom was defective.

The jury however on June 11, 1915, returned a verdict in favor of the boat company, and awarded damages against the Port of Coquille in the amount of $1,750. The port appealed, but the Supreme Court of Oregon ruled against them, finding that the evidence, evaluated in the light most favorable to the prevailing party, that is, the boat company, was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Fines for defective equipment

In September 1915, as part of a widespread effort by the steamboat inspection service to crack down on safety violations in the Coos Bay area, the owners of the steamer ''Myrtle'' (W.R. Panter, T.W. Panter, W.A. Panter, S. Hufford, and Elmer Hufford) were fined $10 for not having an endorsement for change of master for the vessel, $100 for no fog horn, and $100 for having a defective fire extinguisher on board.Boatmen Heavily Fined -- Inspector McGrath Inflicts Punishment for Failures to Comply with the Law -- Aggregate $5350 -- Long List of Those Alleged to Have Violated Regulations Required on Bay", ''Coos Bay Times'', September 20, 1915, page 1.
/ref> The occasion for the fines was the then recent (July 24, 1915) disaster in Chicago to the steamship ''Eastland'', The possible remission of fines following compliance was not ruled out by the inspectors.

Competition

''Myrtle'' was opposed by the motor launch ''Charm'', and had difficulty competing with the rival vessel.

Sinking at the dock

In February 1921, ''Myrtle'' sank at a dock at Myrtle Point.King, Chuck, Kirk, Linda, and Prola, Carolyn, ''Myrtle Creek and Vicinity: 1893-1950'', Arcadia 2014, at page 27. On board was a cargo consisting of most of a rail car load of canned carrots. The sternwheeler ''Dora'', then also owned by the Panter family doing business as the Myrtle Point Transportation Company, was sent to Myrtle Point to aid in the salvage of ''Myrtle'' and the cargo.

Reconstruction

In 1922, ''Myrtle'' reconstructed by being reduced in length by and converted to freight service. The conversion was done at the Herman Bros. yard at Prosper. For a time thereafter James W. Exon, of Portland, Oregon operated the vessel on the river.

Disposition

''Myrtle'' was abandoned along the bank of the Coquille River on the ranch of Paris Ward, one of the shareholders in the Myrtle Point Transportation Company.Panter, William, "Early River Traffic on the Coquille," ''Glancing Back (Pioneer Lore)'', at 16-19, Vol. I, No. 1, Coos-Curry Pioneer and Historical Association, 1971Marshall, Don, ''Oregon Shipwrecks'', Binford and Mort Publishing, Portland, OR (1984), at page 220

See also

* Steamboats of the Coquille River

Notes

References

Historic Oregon Newspapers

{{Oregon Coast Steamboats

1909 ships
Coos Bay Mosquito Fleet
Steamboats of Oregon
Ships built in Oregon