Content
The film shows a group of young people "bathing" at the titular lake or lagoon, and includes "views of Baralt Plaza, the main market, and, in general, the central belt of the city".:42 Jesús Ricardo Azuaga García writes that the film was stylistically similar to Lumière films, possibly emulating them, in that it was "like a postcard".:29 He later notes that a French sensibility is highly irregular for Venezuelan film, listing only three instances.:37 No copies of the film were preserved, but there have been at least two partial restorations. The first is a reconstructed shot of children jumping into the lake, included on disc 4 of a National Library DVD collection documenting the history of Venezuelan cinema; other images from the film were also included, on disc 3.:66, 91-2 Later, for the 120th anniversary of the premiere in January 2017, the Venezuelan Association of Film Exhibitors produced some reconstructed film of both ''Un celebre especialista...'' and ''Muchachos bañándose...''. The group collected frames from the 1890s stored in the Zulia Photographic Archive, restoring and colorizing the images to recreate the approximate look of the films. Emiliano Faría directed the effort, with Abdel Güerere writing and producing.Screening
Less than six months after Venezuela saw the arrival of the first Vitascope, Venezuelan film as a national industry began on 28 January 1897 at exactly 7:00 pm,:9 with the screening of two films produced in the country—''Un célebre especialista sacando muelas en el gran Hotel Europa'' and ''Muchachos bañándose en la laguna de Maracaibo''. This screening was held at the Teatro Baralt inProduction and identity of director
The film is widely stated to have been made by Manuel Trujillo Durán, a view that persisted even after it was determined the film pioneer did not bring the Vitascope to Venezuela.:47 For many years, sources suggested that it was Trujillo, with or without his brother Guillermo, who made the early films.:242:22:14 Debate still continues, with Venezuelan film scholars variously suggesting different likelihoods that Trujillo was the director. To support the opinion he was not the director, there is evidence that Trujillo probably did not have a motion picture camera with which to make the film, and was in Táchira at the time.:54 Those who feel Trujillo could be the director rely on his proximity to film at its inception in Venezuela and his relationship with American camera companies.:337 Even Rodolfo Izaguirre, veteran Venezuelan film critic and inveterate supporter of Trujillo, says the films are only "presumed" to be made by him,:752 with Venezuelan film histories that support Trujillo noting that "it is said" he was the pioneer.:337 Alexis Fernández, film scholar and lecturer, and a biographer of Trujillo, discussed the production of the first films in a television interview in 2013, agreeing that there is nothing tangible to prove who the director was. While it is generally accepted that Trujillo did not make the film,:2060 in both local and national Venezuelan news and culture, however, the belief that Trujillo effectively and single-handedly started Venezuelan cinema persists. An article in the pro-Maduro newspaper ''Modern critical views
Azuaga García writes that the film falls into one of the two main categories of film at its time; he explains that in Venezuelan early cinema there were typically either government-focused or tourism films, ''Muchachos bañandose...'' is the latter, and may have inspired Julio Soto's films of the 1910s, ''Tomas del Lago'' and ''Revista de Maracaibo''.:35 Discussing the success of these first films of the nation, Michelle Leigh Farrell questions the Venezuelan film industry's influence; though leading in the 1890s by virtue of having some of the earliest films in Latin America, its output was lacking compared to other South American countries through the 20th century. She proposes that being a frontrunner in filmmaking was cause for the government to take over the industry for the purpose of self-promotion, stymying general cinema production.:21 Michael Chanan instead notes that after the first films, it was typical of the Latin American markets to slow down production, though he also suggests there may be many lost and forgotten films from the early to mid century.:427-435 Elisa Martínez de Badra compares the film and its pair to their few predecessors, writing that the Edison films shown in Maracaibo in 1896 were "theatrical spectacle" but that ''Muchachos bañándose...'' was not; Martínez describes it as a "new media". She also says that ''Muchachos bañándose...'' together with ''Un célebre especialista...'' are one of two factors leading to the development of a narrative approach in Venezuelan cinema—the other was the working partnership ofNotes
References
{{DEFAULTSORT:Muchachos bañandose en la laguna de Maracaibo 1897 films Venezuelan black-and-white films Venezuelan silent short films 1890s short documentary films Black-and-white documentary films Lost Venezuelan films Venezuelan short documentary films Works of unknown authorship Films set on beaches Documentary films about Venezuela