''Morton v Douglas Homes Ltd'' has become an important case in New Zealand as a result of the leaky homes crisis. The salience of the case comes from the fact that Justice Hardie Boys held the directors of a building company personally liable for damage caused by defective foundations. The case has been described in the

Court of Appeal A court of appeals, also called a court of appeal, appellate court, appeal court, court of second instance or second instance court, is any court of law that is empowered to hear an appeal of a trial court or other lower tribunal. In much of t ...

as one that, "certainly provides some authority for the view that the directors of a building company with actual control of particular building operations owe a duty of care, associated with that control."

Background

Between 1976 and 1977 Douglas Homes Ltd built four flats in a residential subdivision in Waimairi County, Canterbury over the top of an old shingle pit. Before construction, "the directors had been advised by an engineer on the work necessary for the laying of foundations for two flats. One of the directors did not ensure that the engineer’s advice was adhered to in the construction of the foundations of one flat. The other director specifically took charge of the works on the other, and failed to ensure the engineer’s advice was followed."

Judgment

Hardie Boys J reasoned that the directors of Douglas Homes Ltd could be held liable for their negligence as, "The principle of limited liability protects shareholders and not directors, and a director is as responsible for his own torts as any other servant or agent." Hardie Boys J held that in establishing whether a director owed a duty of care the test was to be that established in '' Anns v Merton London Borough Council'' 978AC 728 and that a duty of care was founded upon the control a director exercised over the operations of a company.

Significance

The ratio has not yet been overturned and as such remains a precedent for holding directors liable for defects in construction that was under their control. In 2006 in ''Dicks v Hobson Swan Construction Limited (in liquidation),'' Justice Baragwanath applied the ratio of the case to hold a director personally liable for a leaky building constructed by his company.''Dicks v Hobson Swan Construction Limited (in liquidation)'' HC Auckland CIV 2004-404-1065, 20 October 2006 In a 2010 appeal from the Weathertight Homes Tribunal Justice Wylie noted the correct approach to searching for directorial liability lay through the test articulated in ''Morton v Douglas Homes Ltd'';

References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Morton v Douglas Homes Ltd High Court of New Zealand cases 1983 in New Zealand law 1983 in case law New Zealand tort case law Corporate law