Molien V. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Molien v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals'', (1980), was a
case Case or CASE may refer to: Containers * Case (goods), a package of related merchandise * Cartridge case or casing, a firearm cartridge component * Bookcase, a piece of furniture used to store books * Briefcase or attaché case, a narrow box to c ...
decided by the
Supreme Court of California The Supreme Court of California is the highest and final court of appeals in the courts of the U.S. state of California. It is headquartered in San Francisco at the Earl Warren Building, but it regularly holds sessions in Los Angeles and Sacra ...
that first recognized that a "direct victim" of negligence can recover damages for emotional distress without an accompanying physical injury.


Factual background

A doctor employed by the defendant hospital incorrectly diagnosed a patient as having
syphilis Syphilis () is a sexually transmitted infection caused by the bacterium ''Treponema pallidum'' subspecies ''pallidum''. The signs and symptoms of syphilis vary depending in which of the four stages it presents (primary, secondary, latent, an ...
. The doctor encouraged the patient to disclose the illness to her husband, and when she communicated the erroneous diagnosis to her husband, their marital relationship was destroyed. When it was determined that the diagnosis was incorrect, the husband brought an action against the hospital for negligent infliction of emotional distress.


Decision

The court ruled that the risk of harm to the husband of the patient from a misdiagnosis was reasonably foreseeable, and that the tortious conduct was directed at the patient and her husband. As a "direct victim," the strict criteria for
negligent infliction of emotional distress The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The underlying concept is that one has ...
need not be fulfilled.Henderson, J.A., p. 318


See also

* Cahoon v. Cummings (2000), Indiana case law


References

{{United States tort case law United States negligence case law 1980 in United States case law Supreme Court of California case law 1980 in California Kaiser Permanente hospitals