Minkowski Gauge
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In
mathematics Mathematics is an area of knowledge that includes the topics of numbers, formulas and related structures, shapes and the spaces in which they are contained, and quantities and their changes. These topics are represented in modern mathematics ...
, in the field of functional analysis, a Minkowski functional (after
Hermann Minkowski Hermann Minkowski (; ; 22 June 1864 – 12 January 1909) was a German mathematician and professor at Königsberg, Zürich and Göttingen. He created and developed the geometry of numbers and used geometrical methods to solve problems in number t ...
) or gauge function is a function that recovers a notion of distance on a linear space. If K is a subset of a real or complex vector space X, then the or of K is defined to be the function p_K : X \to , \infty valued in the extended real numbers, defined by p_K(x) := \inf \ \quad \text x \in X, where the infimum of the empty set is defined to be
positive infinity In mathematics, the affinely extended real number system is obtained from the real number system \R by adding two infinity elements: +\infty and -\infty, where the infinities are treated as actual numbers. It is useful in describing the algebra ...
\,\infty\, (which is a real number so that p_K(x) would then be real-valued). The Minkowski function is always non-negative (meaning p_K \geq 0) and p_K(x) is a real number if and only if \ is not empty. This property of being nonnegative stands in contrast to other classes of functions, such as sublinear functions and real
linear functionals In mathematics, a linear form (also known as a linear functional, a one-form, or a covector) is a linear map from a vector space to its field of scalars (often, the real numbers or the complex numbers). If is a vector space over a field , the ...
, that do allow negative values. In functional analysis, K is usually assumed to have properties (such as being absorbing in X, for instance) that will guarantee that for every x \in X, this set \ is not empty precisely because this results in p_K being real-valued. Moreover, K is also often assumed to have more properties, such as being an absorbing
disk Disk or disc may refer to: * Disk (mathematics), a geometric shape * Disk storage Music * Disc (band), an American experimental music band * ''Disk'' (album), a 1995 EP by Moby Other uses * Disk (functional analysis), a subset of a vector sp ...
in X, since these properties guarantee that p_K will be a (real-valued) seminorm on X. In fact, every seminorm p on X is equal to the Minkowski functional of any subset K of X satisfying \ \subseteq K \subseteq \ (where all three of these sets are necessarily absorbing in X and the first and last are also disks). Thus every seminorm (which is a defined by purely algebraic properties) can be associated (non-uniquely) with an absorbing disk (which is a with certain geometric properties) and conversely, every absorbing disk can be associated with its Minkowski functional (which will necessarily be a seminorm). These relationships between seminorms, Minkowski functionals, and absorbing disks is a major reason why Minkowski functionals are studied and used in functional analysis. In particular, through these relationships, Minkowski functionals allow one to "translate" certain properties of a subset of X into certain properties of a function on X.


Definition

Let K be a subset of a real or complex vector space X. Define the of K or the associated with or induced by K as being the function p_K : X \to , \infty valued in the extended real numbers, defined by p_K(x) := \inf \, where recall that the infimum of the empty set is \,\infty\, (that is, \inf \varnothing = \infty). Here, \ is shorthand for \. For any x \in X, p_K(x) \neq \infty if and only if \ is not empty. The arithmetic operations on \R can be extended to operate on \pm \infty, where \frac := 0 for all non-zero real - \infty < r < \infty. The products 0 \cdot \infty and 0 \cdot - \infty remain undefined. Some conditions making a gauge real-valued In the field of convex analysis, the map p_K taking on the value of \,\infty\, is not necessarily an issue. However, in functional analysis p_K is almost always real-valued (that is, to never take on the value of \,\infty\,), which happens if and only if the set \ is non-empty for every x \in X. In order for p_K to be real-valued, it suffices for the origin of X to belong to the or of K in X. If K is absorbing in X, where recall that this implies that 0 \in K, then the origin belongs to the
algebraic interior In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, the algebraic interior or radial kernel of a subset of a vector space is a refinement of the concept of the interior. Definition Assume that A is a subset of a vector space X. The ''algebraic i ...
of K in X and thus p_K is real-valued. Characterizations of when p_K is real-valued are given below.


Motivating examples

Example 1 Consider a normed vector space (X, \, \,\cdot\,\, ), with the norm \, \,\cdot\,\, and let U := \ be the unit ball in X. Then for every x \in X, \, x\, = p_U(x). Thus the Minkowski functional p_U is just the norm on X. Example 2 Let X be a vector space without topology with underlying scalar field \mathbb. Let f : X \to \mathbb be any linear functional on X (not necessarily continuous). Fix a > 0. Let K be the set K := \ and let p_K be the Minkowski functional of K. Then p_K(x) = \frac , f(x), \quad \text x \in X. The function p_K has the following properties: #It is : p_K(x + y) \leq p_K(x) + p_K(y). #It is : p_K(s x) = , s, p_K(x) for all scalars s. #It is : p_K \geq 0. Therefore, p_K is a seminorm on X, with an induced topology. This is characteristic of Minkowski functionals defined via "nice" sets. There is a one-to-one correspondence between seminorms and the Minkowski functional given by such sets. What is meant precisely by "nice" is discussed in the section below. Notice that, in contrast to a stronger requirement for a norm, p_K(x) = 0 need not imply x = 0. In the above example, one can take a nonzero x from the kernel of f. Consequently, the resulting topology need not be Hausdorff.


Common conditions guaranteeing gauges are seminorms

To guarantee that p_K(0) = 0, it will henceforth be assumed that 0 \in K. In order for p_K to be a seminorm, it suffices for K to be a
disk Disk or disc may refer to: * Disk (mathematics), a geometric shape * Disk storage Music * Disc (band), an American experimental music band * ''Disk'' (album), a 1995 EP by Moby Other uses * Disk (functional analysis), a subset of a vector sp ...
(that is, convex and balanced) and absorbing in X, which are the most common assumption placed on K. More generally, if K is convex and the origin belongs to the
algebraic interior In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, the algebraic interior or radial kernel of a subset of a vector space is a refinement of the concept of the interior. Definition Assume that A is a subset of a vector space X. The ''algebraic i ...
of K, then p_K is a nonnegative sublinear functional on X, which implies in particular that it is subadditive and
positive homogeneous In mathematics, a homogeneous function is a function of several variables such that, if all its arguments are multiplied by a scalar, then its value is multiplied by some power of this scalar, called the degree of homogeneity, or simply the ''deg ...
. If K is absorbing in X then p_ is positive homogeneous, meaning that p_(s x) = s p_(x) for all real s \geq 0, where
, 1 The comma is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. It has the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark () in many typefaces, but it differs from them in being placed on the baseline (t ...
K = \. If q is a nonnegative real-valued function on X that is positive homogeneous, then the sets U := \ and D := \ satisfy
, 1 The comma is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. It has the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark () in many typefaces, but it differs from them in being placed on the baseline (t ...
U = U and
, 1 The comma is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. It has the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark () in many typefaces, but it differs from them in being placed on the baseline (t ...
D = D; if in addition q is absolutely homogeneous then both U and D are balanced.


Gauges of absorbing disks

Arguably the most common requirements placed on a set K to guarantee that p_K is a seminorm are that K be an absorbing
disk Disk or disc may refer to: * Disk (mathematics), a geometric shape * Disk storage Music * Disc (band), an American experimental music band * ''Disk'' (album), a 1995 EP by Moby Other uses * Disk (functional analysis), a subset of a vector sp ...
in X. Due to how common these assumptions are, the properties of a Minkowski functional p_K when K is an absorbing disk will now be investigated. Since all of the results mentioned above made few (if any) assumptions on K, they can be applied in this special case. Convexity and subadditivity A simple geometric argument that shows convexity of K implies subadditivity is as follows. Suppose for the moment that p_K(x) = p_K(y) = r. Then for all e > 0, x, y \in K_e := (r, e) K. Since K is convex and r + e \neq 0, K_e is also convex. Therefore, \frac x + \frac y \in K_e. By definition of the Minkowski functional p_K, p_K\left(\frac x + \frac y\right) \leq r + e = \frac p_K(x) + \frac p_K(y) + e. But the left hand side is \frac p_K(x + y), so that p_K(x + y) \leq p_K(x) + p_K(y) + 2 e. Since e > 0 was arbitrary, it follows that p_K(x + y) \leq p_K(x) + p_K(y), which is the desired inequality. The general case p_K(x) > p_K(y) is obtained after the obvious modification. Convexity of K, together with the initial assumption that the set \ is nonempty, implies that K is absorbing. Balancedness and absolute homogeneity Notice that K being balanced implies that \lambda x \in r K \quad \mbox \quad x \in \frac K. Therefore p_K (\lambda x) = \inf \left\ = \inf \left\ = \inf \left\ = , \lambda, p_K(x).


Algebraic properties

Let X be a real or complex vector space and let K be an absorbing disk in X.


Topological properties

Assume that X is a (real or complex) topological vector space (TVS) (not necessarily Hausdorff or
locally convex In functional analysis and related areas of mathematics, locally convex topological vector spaces (LCTVS) or locally convex spaces are examples of topological vector spaces (TVS) that generalize normed spaces. They can be defined as topological ve ...
) and let K be an absorbing disk in X. Then \operatorname_X K \; \subseteq \; \ \; \subseteq \; K \; \subseteq \; \ \; \subseteq \; \operatorname_X K, where \operatorname_X K is the
topological interior In mathematics, specifically in topology, the interior of a subset of a topological space is the union of all subsets of that are open in . A point that is in the interior of is an interior point of . The interior of is the complement of the ...
and \operatorname_X K is the topological closure of K in X. Importantly, it was assumed that p_K was continuous nor was it assumed that K had any topological properties. Moreover, the Minkowski functional p_K is continuous if and only if K is a neighborhood of the origin in X. If p_K is continuous then \operatorname_X K = \ \quad \text \quad \operatorname_X K = \.


Minimal requirements on the set

This section will investigate the most general case of the gauge of subset K of X. The more common special case where K is assumed to be an absorbing
disk Disk or disc may refer to: * Disk (mathematics), a geometric shape * Disk storage Music * Disc (band), an American experimental music band * ''Disk'' (album), a 1995 EP by Moby Other uses * Disk (functional analysis), a subset of a vector sp ...
in X was discussed above.


Properties

All results in this section may be applied to the case where K is an absorbing disk. Throughout, K is any subset of X. The proofs of these basic properties are straightforward exercises so only the proofs of the most important statements are given. The proof that a convex subset A \subseteq X that satisfies (0, \infty) A = X is necessarily absorbing in X is straightforward and can be found in the article on absorbing sets. For any real t > 0, \ = \left\ = t \ so that taking the infimum of both sides shows that p_K(tx) = \inf \ = t \inf \ = t p_K(x). This proves that Minkowski functionals are strictly positive homogeneous. For 0 \cdot p_K(x) to be well-defined, it is necessary and sufficient that p_K(x) \neq \infty; thus p_K(tx) = t p_K(x) for all x \in X and all real t \geq 0 if and only if p_K is real-valued. The hypothesis of statement (7) allows us to conclude that p_K(s x) = p_K(x) for all x \in X and all scalars s satisfying , s, = 1. Every scalar s is of the form r e^ for some real t where r := , s, \geq 0 and e^ is real if and only if s is real. The results in the statement about absolute homogeneity follow immediately from the aforementioned conclusion, from the strict positive homogeneity of p_K, and from the positive homogeneity of p_K when p_K is real-valued. \blacksquare


Examples

  1. If \mathcal is a non-empty collection of subsets of X then p_(x) = \inf \left\ for all x \in X, where \cup \mathcal := \bigcup_ L. * Thus p_(x) = \min \left\ for all x \in X.
  2. If \mathcal is a non-empty collection of subsets of X and I \subseteq X satisfies \left\ \quad \subseteq \quad I \quad \subseteq \quad \left\ then p_I(x) = \sup \left\ for all x \in X.
The following examples show that the containment (0, R] K \subseteq \bigcap_ (0, R + e) K could be proper. Example: If R = 0 and K = X then (0, R] K = (0, 0] X = \varnothing X = \varnothing but \bigcap_ (0, e) K = \bigcap_ X = X, which shows that its possible for (0, R] K to be a proper subset of \bigcap_ (0, R + e) K when R = 0. \blacksquare The next example shows that the containment can be proper when R = 1; the example may be generalized to any real R > 0. Assuming that
, 1 The comma is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. It has the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark () in many typefaces, but it differs from them in being placed on the baseline (t ...
K \subseteq K, the following example is representative of how it happens that x \in X satisfies p_K(x) = 1 but x \not\in (0, 1] K. Example: Let x \in X be non-zero and let K = [0, 1) x so that
, 1 The comma is a punctuation mark that appears in several variants in different languages. It has the same shape as an apostrophe or single closing quotation mark () in many typefaces, but it differs from them in being placed on the baseline (t ...
K = K and x \not\in K. From x \not\in (0, 1) K = K it follows that p_K(x) \geq 1. That p_K(x) \leq 1 follows from observing that for every e > 0, (0, 1 + e) K = [0, 1 + e)([0, 1) x) = [0, 1 + e) x, which contains x. Thus p_K(x) = 1 and x \in \bigcap_ (0, 1 + e) K. However, (0, 1] K = (0, 1]([0, 1) x) = [0, 1) x = K so that x \not\in (0, 1] K, as desired. \blacksquare


Positive homogeneity characterizes Minkowski functionals

The next theorem shows that Minkowski functionals are those functions f : X \to , \infty/math> that have a certain purely algebraic property that is used widely. This theorem can be extended to characterize certain classes of \infty, \infty/math>-valued maps (for example, real-valued sublinear functions) in terms of Minkowski functionals. For instance, it can be used to describe how every real homogeneous function f : X \to \R (such as linear functionals) can be written in terms of a unique Minkowski functional having a certain property. If f(t x) \leq t f(x) holds for all x \in X and real t > 0 then t f(x) = t f\left(\tfrac(t x)\right) \leq t \tfrac f(t x) = f(t x) \leq t f(x) so that t f(x) = f(t x). Only (1) implies (3) will be proven because afterwards, the rest of the theorem follows immediately from the basic properties of Minkowski functionals described earlier; properties that will henceforth be used without comment. So assume that f : X \to , \infty/math> is a function such that f(t x) = t f(x) for all x \in X and all real t > 0 and let K := \. For all real t > 0, f(0) = f(t 0) = t f(0) so by taking t = 2 for instance, it follows that either f(0) = 0 \text f(0) = \infty. Let x \in X. It remains to show that f(x) = p_K(x). It will now be shown that if f(x) = 0 or f(x) = \infty then f(x) = p_K(x), so that in particular, it will follow that f(0) = p_K(0). So suppose that f(x) = 0 or f(x) = \infty; in either case f(t x) = t f(x) = f(x) for all real t > 0. Now if f(x) = 0 then this implies that that t x \in K for all real t > 0 (since f(t x) = 0 \leq 1), which implies that p_K(x) = 0, as desired. Similarly, if f(x) = \infty then t x \not\in K for all real t > 0, which implies that p_K(x) = \infty, as desired. Thus, it will henceforth be assumed that R := f(x) a positive real number and that x \neq 0 (importantly, however, the possibility that p_K(x) is 0 or \,\infty\, has not yet been ruled out). Recall that just like f, the function p_K satisfies p_K(t x) = t p_K(x) for all real t > 0. Since 0 < \tfrac < \infty, p_K(x)= R = f(x) if and only if p_K\left(\tfrac x\right) = 1 = f\left(\tfrac x\right) so assume without loss of generality that R = 1 and it remains to show that p_K\left(\tfrac x\right) = 1. Since f(x) = 1, x \in K \subseteq (0, 1] K, which implies that p_K(x) \leq 1 (so in particular, p_K(x) \neq \infty is guaranteed). It remains to show that p_K(x) \geq 1, which recall happens if and only if x \not\in (0, 1) K. So assume for the sake of contradiction that x \in (0, 1) K and let 0 < r < 1 and k \in K be such that x = r k, where note that k \in K implies that f(k) \leq 1. Then 1 = f(x) = f(r k) = r f(k) \leq r < 1. \blacksquare


Characterizing Minkowski functionals on star sets


Characterizing Minkowski functionals that are seminorms

In this next theorem, which follows immediately from the statements above, K is assumed to be absorbing in X and instead, it is deduced that (0, 1) K is absorbing when p_K is a seminorm. It is also not assumed that K is balanced (which is a property that K is often required to have); in its place is the weaker condition that (0, 1) s K \subseteq (0, 1) K for all scalars s satisfying , s, = 1. The common requirement that K be convex is also weakened to only requiring that (0, 1) K be convex.


Positive sublinear functions and Minkowski functionals

It may be shown that a real-valued
subadditive function In mathematics, subadditivity is a property of a function that states, roughly, that evaluating the function for the sum of two elements of the domain always returns something less than or equal to the sum of the function's values at each element ...
f : X \to \R on an arbitrary topological vector space X is continuous at the origin if and only if it is uniformly continuous, where if in addition f is nonnegative, then f is continuous if and only if V := \ is an open neighborhood in X. If f : X \to \R is subadditive and satisfies f(0) = 0, then f is continuous if and only if its absolute value , f, : X \to sublinear function is a Nonnegative homogeneity">nonnegative homogeneous function f : X \to [0, \infty) that satisfies the triangle inequality. It follows immediately from the results below that for such a function f, if V := \ then f = p_V. Given K \subseteq X, the Minkowski functional p_K is a sublinear function if and only if it is real-valued and subadditive, which is happens if and only if (0, \infty) K = X and (0, 1) K is convex. Correspondence between open convex sets and positive continuous sublinear functions Let V \neq \varnothing be an open convex subset of X. If 0 \in V then let z := 0 and otherwise let z \in V be arbitrary. Let p : X \to [0, \infty) be the Minkowski functional of K := V - z where this convex open neighborhood of the origin satisfies (0, 1) K = K. Then p is a continuous sublinear function on X since V - z is convex, absorbing, and open (however, p is not necessarily a seminorm since it is not necessarily absolutely homogeneous). From the properties of Minkowski functionals, it follows that V - z = \ so that V = z + \. Since z + \ = \, this completes the proof. \blacksquare


See also

* * * * * * * * * * * *


Notes


References

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Further reading

* F. Simeski, A.M.P. Boelens and M. Ihme. Modeling Adsorption in Silica Pores via Minkowski Functionals and Molecular Electrostatic Moments. ''Energies'' 13 (22) 5976 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13225976 {{Convex analysis and variational analysis Convex analysis Functional analysis Hermann Minkowski