Middle Low German language

Middle Low German or Middle Saxon (autonym: ''Sassisch'', i.e. "Saxon", Standard High German: ', Modern Dutch: ') is a developmental stage of Low German. It developed from the Old Saxon language in the Middle Ages and has been documented in writing since about 1225/34 ('' Sachsenspiegel''). During the Hanseatic period (from about 1300 to about 1600), Middle Low German was the leading written language in the north of Central Europe and served as a lingua franca in the northern half of Europe. It was used parallel to medieval Latin also for purposes of diplomacy and for deeds.

Terminology

While ''Middle Low German'' (MLG) is a scholarly term developed in hindsight, speakers in their time referred to the language mainly as (Saxon) or (the Saxon language). This terminology was also still known in Luther's time in the adjacent Central German-speaking areas. Its Latin equivalent was also used as meaning 'Low German' (among other meanings). Some languages whose first contacts with Germany were via Low German-speaking 'Saxons', took their name as meaning 'German' in general, e.g. Finnish 'German'.

In contrast to Latin as the primary written language, speakers also referred to discourse in Saxon as speaking/writing , i.e. 'clearly, intelligibly'. This contains the same root as 'German' (cf. High German: , Dutch (archaically ''N(i)ederduytsche'' to mean the contemporary version of the Dutch language) both from Proto-Germanic "of the people"; 'popular, vernacular') which could also be used for Low German if the context was clear. Compare also the modern colloquial term (from 'plain, simple') denoting Low (or West Central) German dialects in contrast to the written standard.

Another medieval term is (lit. 'East-ish') which was at first applied to the Hanseatic cities of the Baltic Sea (the 'East Sea'), their territory being called ('East-land'), their inhabitants ('Eastlings'). This appellation was later expanded to other German Hanseatic cities and it was a general name for Hanseatic merchants in the Netherlands, e.g. in Bruges where they had their (office; see Kontor).

In the 16th century, the term (lit. 'Lowland-ish, Netherlandish') gained ground, contrasting Saxon with the German dialects in the uplands to the south. It became dominant in the High German dialects (as ENHG , which could also refer to the modern Netherlands), while remained the most widespread term within MLG. The equivalent of 'Low German' ( NHG ) seems to have been introduced later on by High German speakers and at first applied especially to Netherlanders.

''Middle Low German'' is a modern term used with varying degrees of inclusivity. It is distinguished from Middle High German, spoken to the south, which was later replaced by Early New High German. Though Middle Dutch is today usually excluded from MLG (although very closely related), it is sometimes, especially in older literature, included in MLG, which then encompasses the dialect continuum of all high-medieval Continental Germanic dialects outside MHG, from Flanders in the West to the eastern Baltic.

Extent

Middle Low German covered a wider area than the Old Saxon language of the preceding period, due to expansion to the East and, to a lesser degree, to the North.

In the East, the MLG-speaking area expanded greatly as part of the ''Ostsiedlung'' (settlement of the East) in the 12th to 14th century and came to include Mecklenburg, Brandenburg, Pomerania and (Old) Prussia, which were hitherto dominated by Slavic and Baltic tribes. Some pockets of these native peoples persisted for quite some time, e.g. the '' Wends'' along the lower Elbe until about 1700 or the Kashubians of Eastern Pomerania up to modern times.

In the North, the Frisian-speaking areas along the North Sea diminished in favour of Saxon, esp. in East Frisia which largely switched to MLG since the mid-14th century. North of the Elbe, MLG advanced slowly into Sleswick, against Danish and North Frisian, although the whole region was ruled by Denmark. MLG exerted a huge influence upon Scandinavia (cf. ''History''), although native speakers of Low German were mostly confined to the cities where they formed colonies of merchants and craftsmen. It was an official language of Old Livonia, whose population consisted mostly of Baltic and Finnic tribes.

In the West, at the Zuiderzee, the forests of the Veluwe and close to the Lower Rhine, MLG bordered on closely related Low Franconian dialects whose written language was mainly Middle Dutch. In earlier times, these were sometimes included in the modern definition of MLG (cf. ''Terminology'').

In the South, MLG bordered on High German dialects roughly along the northern borders of Hesse and Thuringia. The language border then ran eastwards across the plain of the middle Elbe until it met the (then more extensive) Sorb-speaking area along the upper Spree that separated it from High German. The border was never a sharp one, rather a continuum. The modern convention is to use the pronunciation of northern ''maken'' vs. southern ''machen'' ('to make') for determining an exact border. Along the middle Elbe and lower Saale rivers, Low German began to retreat in favour of High German dialects already during Late Medieval times (cf. ''Wittenberg'' whose name is Low German but whose inhabitants already spoke mostly/exclusively High German when the Reformation set in).

History

Sub-periods of Middle Low German are:

* Early Middle Low German (Standard High German: ): 1200–1350, or 1200–1370
* Classical Middle Low German (): 1350–1500, or 1370–1530
* Late Middle Low German (): 1500–1600, or 1530–1650

Middle Low German was the lingua franca of the Hanseatic League, spoken all around the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. It used to be thought that the language of Lübeck was dominant enough to become a normative standard (the so-called ) for an emergent spoken and written standard, but more recent work has established that there is no evidence for this and that Middle Low German was non-standardised.

Middle Low German provided a large number of loanwords to languages spoken around the Baltic Sea as a result of the activities of Hanseatic traders. Its traces can be seen in the Scandinavian, Finnic, and Baltic languages, as well as Standard High German and English. It is considered the largest single source of loanwords in Danish, Estonian, Latvian, Norwegian and Swedish.

Beginning in the 15th century, Middle Low German fell out of favour compared to Early Modern High German, which was first used by elites as a written and, later, a spoken language. Reasons for this loss of prestige include the decline of the Hanseatic League, followed by political heteronomy of Northern Germany and the cultural predominance of Central and Southern Germany during the Protestant Reformation and Luther's translation of the Bible.

Phonology and orthography

The description is based on Lasch (1914) which continues to be the authoritative comprehensive grammar of the language but is not necessarily up-to-date in every detail.

Consonants

* Square brackets indicate allophones.
* Round brackets indicate phonemes that do not have phoneme status in the whole language area or are marginal in the phonological system.

It has to be noted that it is not rare to find the same word in MLG affected by one of the following phonological processes in one text and unaffected by it in another text because the lack of a written standard, the dialectal variation and ongoing linguistic change during the Middle Low German (MLG) era.

General notes
* Final devoicing: Voiced obstruents in the syllable coda are devoiced, e.g. ''geven'' (to give) but ''gift'' (gift). The change took place early in MLG but is not always represented in writing. Proclitic words like ''mid'' (with) might remain voiced before a vowel because they are perceived as one phonological unit with the following word. Also, as can already be seen in Old Saxon, lenited is devoiced to before syllabic nasals or liquids, e.g. ''gaffel'' (fork) from PG ''*gabalō''.
* Grammatischer Wechsel: Because of sound changes in Proto-Germanic (cf. Verner's law), some words had different sounds in different grammatical forms. In MLG, there were only fossilised remnants of the "grammatischer wechsel" (grammatical change), namely for and , e.g. ''kêsen'' (to choose) but ''koren'' ((they) chose), and for and , e.g. ''vân'' < PG ''*fanhaną'' (to take hold, to catch) but ''gevangen'' < PG ''*fanganaz'' (taken hold of, caught).
* Assimilation: A sound becoming more similar to a (usually) neighbouring sound, usually in place or manner of articulation, is very common across all languages. Early MLG mared assimilation much more often in writing than later periods, e.g. ''vamme'' instead of ''van deme'' (of the).
* Dissimilation: In MLG, it frequently happened with vs. or vs. , e.g. ''balbêrer'' < ''barbêrer'' (barber), or ''knuflôk'' < ''kluflôk'' (garlic). Both forms frequently co-existed. The complete loss of a sound in proximity to an identical sound can also be explained in such a way, e.g. the loss of in ''Willem'' (William) < ''Wilhelm''.
* Metathesis: Some sounds tended to switch their places, especially the "liquids" and . Both forms may co-exist, e.g. ''brennen'' vs. (metathesised) ''bernen'' (to burn).
* Gemination: In MLG, geminate consonants, which came into being by assimilation or syncope, were no longer pronounced as such. Instead, geminate spelling marks the preceding vowel as short. Many variants exist, like combinations of voiced and voiceless consonants (e.g. letters, Sundays). Late MLG tended to use clusters of similar consonants after short as well as long vowels for no apparent reason, e.g. for (time).
* h spellings: A mute ''h'' appeared sporadically after consonants already in Old Saxon. Its use greatly increased in MLG, first at the end of a word, when it often marked the preceding vowel as long, but it later appears largely randomly. In very late times, the use of ''h'' directly after the vowel is sometimes adopted from Modern High German as a sign of vowel length.

Specific notes on nasals
(Indented notes refer to orthography.)

* had a tendency to shift to in the coda, e.g. ''dem'' > ''den'' (the (dat.sg.m.)).
** Intervocalic is sometimes spelled ''mb'' whether or not it developed from Old Saxon .
* assimilated to before velars and .
* Final often dropped out in unstressed position before consonants, e.g., (we have), cf. Modern Dutch for a similar process. Similarly, it often dropped from -clusters after unstressed vowels, especially in Westphalian, e.g. ''jârlix'' (annually) < ''jârlings''.
* Furthermore, had been deleted in certain coda positions several centuries earlier (the so-called Ingvaeonic nasal spirant law), but there were many exceptions and restorations through analogy: the shifted form ''gôs'' (goose < PG ''*gans'') with an unshifted plural ''gense'' (geese) was quite common. Non-shifted forms have been common in the more innovative Eastern dialects.

Specific notes on stops and fricatives
* as a stop is always word-initially (''blôme'' flower, bloom), at the onset of stressed syllables (''barbêrer'' barber) and (historically) geminated (''ebbe'' ebb, low tide). Its allophones in other cases are word-internal and word-final (e.g. ''drêven'' to drive, vs. ''drêf'' drive (n.)).
* Voiceless usually appeared word-initially (e.g. ''vader'' father), word-finally (merged with historical , see above), otherwise between short vowels and nasals/liquids (also from historical , e.g. ''gaffel'' fork) and in loans (e.g. ''straffen'' to tighten, from High German).
** It was mostly written ''v'' in the syllable onset, in the coda. Exceptions include loans (''figûre''), some proper names (''Frederik''), cases like ''gaffel'' as mentioned earlier and sporadically before ''u'' (where ''v'' would be too similar graphically) and before ''l'' and ''r''. Sometimes, ''w'' is used for ''v'', and ''ph'' for ''f''.
** It has to be noted that in MLG (like in other medieval) texts, there is usually no clear graphic distinction between ''v'' and ''u''. The distinction between both (consonant value as ''v'', vocalic value as ''u'') is used in modern dictionaries, in grammars and in this article simply for better readability. Thus, in the manuscripts, e.g. ''auer'' is ''aver'' (but).
* was originally an approximant but seems to have later shifted towards a fricative. Its exact articulation likely differed from dialect to dialect, and many of them merged word-internally with , an allophone of .
** In writing, ''w'' for word-internal was kept strictly separate from at first, but the use of ''w'' later also expanded to .
** The clusters , , , were originally often written with ''v''/''u'' (''svager'' brother-in-law) but later mostly shifted to a ''w''-spelling, except for , which kept ''qu'' from Latin influence.
* The dentals and tended to drop out between unstressed vowels, e.g. ''antwēr'' (either) instead of ''antwēder'', and in word-final clusters like , or , e.g. often ''rech'' next to ''recht'' (law, right), ''schrîf'' next to ''schrîft'' ((he/she) writes).
* Remnants of Old Saxon shifted via into in the early MLG era. After and , it was the case already in late Old Saxon. For , word-final and some frequent words like ''dat'' (that, the (neut.)), the change also happened very early. The changes happened earliest in Westphalian and latest in North Low Saxon.
* was voiced intervocalically as . Whether it was voiced word-initially is not fully clear. There seems to have been dialectal variation, with voiceless more likely for Westphalian and voiced more likely for East Elbian dialects.
** Because of the variation, voiceless (for example in loans from Romance or Slavic) was often written ''tz'', ''cz'', ''c'' etc. for clarity.
* The phonemic status of is difficult to determine because of the extremely irregular orthography. Its status likely differed between the dialects, with early MLG having (Westphalian keeping it until modern times) and no phonemic , and e.g. East Elbian and in general many later dialects had from earlier . If there is phonemic , it often replaces of in clusters like and .
* Connected with the status of is the manner of articulation of . Orthographic variants and some modern dialects seem to point to a more retracted, more ''sh''-like pronunciation (perhaps ), especially if there was no need to distinguish and . That is shown up by modern Westphalian.
* is at best a marginal role as a phoneme and appears in loans or develops because of compounding or epenthesis. Note the palatalised (next point).
** In writing, it was often marked by copious clustering, e.g. ''ertzcebischope'' (archbishop).
* before front vowels is strongly palatalised in Old Saxon (note the similar situation in the closely related Old English) and at least some of early MLG, as can be seen from spellings like ''zint'' for ''kint'' (child) and the variation of placename spellings, especially in Nordalbingian and Eastphalian, e.g. ''Tzellingehusen'' for modern ''Kellinghusen''. The palatalisation, perhaps as or , persisted until the High Middle Ages but was later mostly reversed. Thus, for instance, the old affricate in the Slavic placename ''Liubici'' could be reinterpreted as a velar stop, giving the modern name '' Lübeck''. A few words and placenames completely palatalised and shifted their velar into a sibilant (''sever'' beetle, chafer, from PG ''*kebrô''; the city of ''Celle'' < Old Saxon ''Kiellu'').
** Early MLG frequently used ''c'' for (''cleyn'' small), which later became rarer. However, geminate ''k'' (after historically short vowels and consonants) continued to be written ''ck'' (e.g. ''klocke'' bell), more rarely ''kk'' or ''gk''.
** ''gk'' otherwise appeared often after nasal (''ringk'' ring, (ice) rink).
** was often written ''x'', especially in the West.
** usually came as ''qu'', under Latin influence (''quêmen'' to come).
* Furthermore, after unstressed , often changed into , e.g. in the frequent derivational suffix ''-lik'' (''vrüntligen'' friendly (infl.)) or, with final devoicing, in ''sich'' instead of ''sik'' (him-/her-/itself, themselves).
** Sometimes, ''ch'' was used for a syllable-final (''ôch'' also, too). The ''h'' can be seen a sign of lengthening of the preceding vowel, not of spirantisation (see "''h''-spelling" below).
* was a fricative. Its exact articulation probably differed by dialect. Broadly, there seems to have been dialects that distinguished a voiced palatal and a voiced velar , depending on surrounding vowels (: word-initially before front vowels, word-internally after front vowels; in those positions, but with back vowels), and dialects that always used word-initially and word-internally (Eastphalian, Brandenburgian, e.g. word-internally after a back vowel: vogt, reeve). Nevertheless, was kept separate from old . In the coda position, came as a dorsal fricative (palatal or velar , depending on the preceding sound), which thus merging with .
** The spelling ''gh'' was at first used almost exclusively before ''e'' or word-finally but began to spread to other positions, notably before ''i''. It did not indicate a different pronunciation but was part of an orthographic pattern seen in many other parts of Europe. Furtherore, in early western traditions of MLG, sometimes ''ch'' was used for in all positions, also word-initially.
** Coda was mostly spelled ''ch'' because it completely merged with historic (see below).
* After nasals and as a geminate, appeared as a stop , e.g. ''seggen'' "to say", ''penninghe'' "pennies". In contrast to modern varieties, it remained audible after a nasal. Pronouncing ''g'' word-initially as a stop is likely a comparatively recent innovation under High German influence.
** could be used for in older MLG, e.g. ''Dudiggerode'' for the town of Düringerode.
* frequently dropped between sonorants (except after nasals), e.g. ''bormêster'' (burgomaster, mayor) < ''borgermêster''.
* was often epenthetised between a stressed and an unstressed vowel, e.g. ''neigen'' (to sew) < Old Saxon ''*nāian'', or ''vrûghe'' (lady, woman) < Old Saxon ''frūa''. In Westphalian, this sound could harden into e.g. ''eggere'' (eggs).
* in the onset was a glottal fricative , and it merged with historic in the coda (see above). Word-final after consonant or long vowel was frequently dropped, e.g. ''hôch'' or ''hô'' (high). In a compound or phrase, it often became silent (''Willem'' < ''Wilhelm'' William).
** Onset was written ''h'', while coda = was mostly written ''ch'' but also and the like because of its merger with .
* Coda = frequently dropped between and , e.g. ''Engelbert'' (a first name) with the common component ''-bert'' < Old Saxon (bright, famous). In unstressed syllables, it could also occur between a vowel and , e.g. ''nit'' (not) < Old Saxon ''niowiht'' (not a thing).
** Often, ''h'' was used for other purposes than its actual sound value: to mark vowel length (see ''h''-spelling under "General Notes" above), to "strengthen" short words (''ghân'' to go), to mark a vocalic onset ( our (infl.)) or vowel hiatus (''sêhes'' (of the) lake).

Specific notes on approximants
* was a palatal approximant and remained separate from , the palatal allophone of .
** It was often spelled ''g'' before front vowels and was not confused with ''gh'' = . The variant ''y'' was sometimes used (''yöget'' youth).
* was likely an alveolar trill or flap , like in most traditional Low German dialects until recently. Post-vocalic sometimes dropped, especially before .
* was originally probably velarised, i.e. a "dark l" , at least in the coda, judging from its influence on surrounding vowels, but it was never extensively vocalised as Dutch was. During the MLG era, it seems to have shifted to a "clear l" in many dialects and tended to be dropped in some usually unstressed words, especially in Westphalian, e.g., , instead of (as).

Vowels

Modern renderings of MLG (like this article) often use circumflex or macron to mark vowel length (e.g. ''â'' or ''ā'') to help the modern reader, but original MLG texts marked vowel length not by accents but by doubling vowels, by adding a lengthening ''e'' or ''i'', by doubling the following consonants (after short vowels) or by adding ''h'' after the following consonants.

Morphology

Noun

Verb

Dialects

Lasch distinguished the following large dialect groups, emphasising that she based it strictly on the orthography, which may often omit strongly dialectal phenomena in favour of more prestigious/"standard" forms. Nevertheless, the dialect groups broadly correspond with modern ones.

Westphalian ( HG: ''Westfälisch'', Dutch: ''Westfaals''): Broadly speaking, the area between the middle Weser and lower Rhine. Main cities: Münster, Paderborn, Dortmund, Bielefeld, Osnabrück. Some Saxon dialects in the modern Netherlands (esp. modern Gelderland and Overijssel) belonged to this group. Dutch influence on them strongly increased since the 15th century.

''Some features'': In the West, strong influence from Low Franconian orthographic patterns (e.g. ''e'' or ''i'' as a sign of length, like ''oi'' = ). The "breaking" of old short vowels in open syllables and before was often marked in writing (e.g. ''karn'' instead of ''korn''). Old geminated and sometimes was hardened into ; frequently shifted to (sometimes reversed in writing); instead of (''sal'' vs ''schal''). The native present plural verbs was ''-et'' but the written norm often impressed ''-en''. Similarly, the participle prefix ''ge-'' was usually written, though probably only spoken in the Southwest. Lexically, strong connections with adjacent dialects further north (East Frisian and Oldenburgish), e.g. ('Wednesday') instead of . Westphalian was and is often thought to be altogether the most conservative dialect group.

North Low Saxon ( HG: ''Nordniedersächsisch'', Dutch: ''Noord-Nedersaksisch''): Spoken in a long stretch of coastal regions from the Zuiderzee in the West to East Prussia in the East. Its orthographic habits come closest to what was traditionally perceived as a MLG standard (the ''Lübeck standard'', nowadays disputed).

Some features: Short and in open syllables are stretched into a -like vowel. The personal suffixes ''-er'' and ''-ald'' appear as ''-ar'' and ''-old''. The pronouns ''mî'' (1.sg.), ''dî'' (2.sg.) and ''jû'' (2.pl.) are used for both dative and accusative.

Three subgroups can be distinguished:

(1) ''East Frisian and Oldenburgish'', i.e. the areas west of the lower Weser, in the North including dialects on Frisian substrate. As can be expected, there is much Westphalian, Dutch and Frisian influence (''hem'' next to ''em'' 'him'; plurals in ''-s''; ''vrent'' next to ''vrünt'' 'friend').

(2) ''Nordalbingian'', between the lower Weser and the lower Elbe, and also Holstein on the right bank of the lower Elbe. main towns: Hamburg, Bremen, Lunenburg, Kiel.

(3) ''East Elbian'', including Lübeck and the areas further east, like Mecklenburg, Pomerania, northern Brandenburg (Prignitz, Uckermark, Altmark), Old Prussia, Livonia. Very close to ''Nordalbingian''. While the Eastern dialects are today clearly distinguished from the West by their uniform present plural verb ending in ''-en'' (against Western uniform ), in MLG times, both endings competed against each other in West and East. Main towns: Lübeck, Wismar, Rostock, Stralsund. High German influence was strong in the Teutonic Order, due to the diverse regional origins of its chivalric elite, therefore MLG written culture was neglected early on.

Eastphalian ( HG: ''Ostfälisch''): Roughly the area east of the middle Weser, north and partly west of the Harz mountains, reaching the middle Elbe, but leaving out the Altmark region. In the north, the sparsely populated Lunenburg Heath forms something of a natural border. Main cities: Hanover, Hildesheim, Brunswick, Goslar, Göttingen, Magdeburg, Halle (early times). The area within the Elbe's drainage was established by colonisation and is in many ways special. The southern part of this ''Elbe Eastphalian'' ( HG: ''Elbostfälisch'') area switched to High German already in Late Medieval times.

''Some features'': Umlaut is more productive, occurring before ''-ich'' and ''-isch'' (e.g. 'Saxon, Low German') and shifting also ''e'' to ''i'' (e.g. ''stidde'' for ''stêde'' 'place'). Diphthongised short is rarely marked as such, contrary to other dialects. Before , ''e'' and ''a'' are frequently interchanged for each other. Unstressed ''o'' (as in the suffix ''-schop'') frequently changes into ''u'' (''-schup''). The modal verb for 'shall/should' features , not (i.e. ''schal''). The past participle's prefix was commonly spoken ''e-'' but mostly written ''ge-'' under prescriptive influence. The local form ''ek'' ('I' (pron. 1.sg.)) competed with "standard" ''ik''; in a similar way the oblique form ''mik'' ('me') with "standard" ''mî''. Unusually, there is also a dative pronoun (1.sg. ''mê''). Lexically, close connections with Nordalbingian. Unusual plural ''menne'' ('men').

(South) Brandenburgish ( HG: ''(Süd-)Brandenburgisch'') and ''East Anhaltish'' ( HG: ''Ostanhaltisch''): Roughly between the middle Elbe and the middle Oder, and along the middle Havel, bordering old Sorbian territory to the Southeast. Main cities: Berlin, Frankfurt/Oder, Zerbst. A colonial dialect strongly influenced by settlers speaking Low Franconian. Also strongly influenced by High German early on.

''Some features'': Old long ''ê'' and ''ô'' were diphthongised into and , written ''i'' and ''u''. Old Germanic coda is restored, contrary to Ingvaeonic sound changes, e.g. ''gans'' 'goose'. Present plural of verbs features the suffix ''-en''. Lack of negative determiner ''nên'' ('no' (attr.)), instead: ''keyn'', similar to High German. The past participle retains the prefix ''ge-''. Lack of ''gaderen'' ('to gather') and ''tőgen'' ('to show'); instead of them, forms close to High German, i.e. and . In East Anhaltish, distinction of dative and accusative pronouns (e.g. ''mi'' vs ''mik'', cf. HG ''mir'' and ''mich'').

Literature

* Bible translations into German
* The '' Sachsenspiegel''
* ''Reynke de Vos'', a version of Reynard
at wikisource


Low German Incunable prints
in Low German as catalogued in the Gesamtkatalog der Wiegendrucke, including the Low German
Ship of Fools
',

' and the novel

'

Sample texts

References

External links

A grammar and chrestomathy of Middle Low German by Heinrich August Lübben (1882)
(in German), at the Internet Archive

A grammar of Middle Low German (1914)
by Agathe Lasch (in German), at the Internet Archive

Schiller-Lübben
A Middle Low German to German dictionary by Schiller/Lübben (1875–1881) a

an
at the Internet Archive

Project TITUS
including texts i



* ttp://germanic-studies.org/Middle-Low-German-loanwords-in-the-Scandinavian-languages.htm Middle Low German influence on the Scandinavian languages
Middle Low German corpus
Still under construction, but the website contains a very concise sketch of MLG grammar also based on Lasch

{{Authority control

Low German
German dialects
Hanseatic League
History of the German language
Low German, Middle
Languages attested from the 12th century