McCutcheon V David MacBrayne Ltd
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''McCutcheon v David MacBrayne Ltd''
964 Year 964 ( CMLXIV) was a leap year starting on Friday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar. Events Byzantine Empire * Arab–Byzantine War: Emperor Nikephoros II continues the reconquest of south-eastern Anatoli ...
1 WLR 125 is a Scottish contract law case, concerning the incorporation of a term through a course of dealings.


Facts

On 8 October 1960, MV Lochiel (1939),
David MacBrayne Ltd David MacBrayne is a limited company owned by the Scottish Government. Formed in 1851 as the private shipping company David Hutcheson & Co. with three partners, David Hutcheson, Alexander Hutcheson and David MacBrayne, it passed in 1878 to David ...
's ferry struck rocks and sank, losing Mr McCutcheon's car en route between
Islay Islay ( ; gd, Ìle, sco, Ila) is the southernmost island of the Inner Hebrides of Scotland. Known as "The Queen of the Hebrides", it lies in Argyll just south west of Jura, Scotland, Jura and around north of the Northern Irish coast. The isl ...
and the mainland. Usually, David MacBrayne Ltd would have got its customers to sign a risk note. The claimant's brother in law (Mr McSporran) had made the shipping arrangements, and he did not sign it. Mr McCutcheon had signed a risk note on four occasions and Mr McSporran had done so sometimes before too. Both said they knew notes contained conditions but not what the conditions were. David MacBrayne Ltd argued that even though it was not signed, the term letting Mr McCutcheon assume the risk of an accident had been incorporated into their contract through a course of dealing.


Judgment

The House of Lords held, reversing the decision of the Court of Session, that there was no regular course of dealing with McCutcheon and no consistent course of dealing with McSporran, and therefore David MacBrayne Ltd could not say that its term shifting the risk of an accident had been incorporated. Lord Reid explained that the term could not be incorporated through reasonable notice or a signature on this occasion alone, and went on. Lord Devlin came to the same conclusion but wished to impose a higher test. According to him actual knowledge would be necessary to incorporate terms. Lord Pearce held that the course of dealings was not consistent, because previously risk notes were signed. A course of dealing must be regular and consistent.


See also

*
English contract law English contract law is the body of law that regulates legally binding agreements in England and Wales. With its roots in the lex mercatoria and the activism of the judiciary during the industrial revolution, it shares a heritage with countries ...
*''
Henry Kendall Ltd v William Lillico Ltd ''Henry Kendall Ltd v William Lillico Ltd'' 9692 AC 31 is an English contract law case concerning the incorporation of contract terms through a course of dealings. Facts Animal food was sold by merchants to a farmer. It was defective. The mercha ...
''
969 Year 969 ( CMLXIX) was a common year starting on Friday (link will display the full calendar) of the Julian calendar, the 969th year of the Common Era (CE) and ''Anno Domini'' (AD) designations, the 969th year of the 1st millennium, the 69th ...
2 AC 31, rejected Lord Devlin's dictum that actual knowledge was necessary to prove before a term is incorporated


Notes

{{reflist


References

* English contract case law House of Lords cases 1964 in case law 1964 in British law David MacBrayne