Mauke Starling

The Mauke starling or mysterious starling (''Aplonis mavornata'') is an extinct species of starling found on the island of Mauke, Cook Islands. The binomen is the result of Buller's misreading of the name ''inornata'' on the specimen label. As he seems to have genuinely believed this spelling to be correct, the binomial, although it has no meaning, is valid.

Description

Its overall length is . Bill from gape , from anterior margin of nostril, 1.24 cm. Tarsus 2.74 cm, tail 6.4 cm, wing 10.5 cm, wingspan 32 cm. Wing and tarsus measurement are somewhat less than in the living bird due to shrinkage of the specimen. The other measurements are either from the freshly killed bird or are unlikely to have changed. Dull dusky black overall, with lighter brown feather edges which are prominent on the body feathers and less conspicuous on the remiges and tail. Iris yellow. Feet dusky brownish; bill the same colour or somewhat lighter.

The geographically closest relative is the Rarotonga starling, which is larger and has a greyish body plumage with light grey feather margins. In overall appearance, ''A. mavornata'' is closest to the Polynesian starling's subspecies ''tenebrosus'' of Niuatoputapu and Tafahi, Tonga; alternatively, it looks much like a much (nearly one-third) smaller, yellow-eyed version of the Samoan starling.

Extinction

There is a lot of mystery surrounding the Mauke Starling. The only known specimen ( BMNH Old Vellum Catalog 12.192) was shot "hopping about n atree", by Andrew Bloxam, naturalist of HMS ''Blonde'', roughly between 2:30 and 3:30 pm on August 9, 1825. The island of Mauke was not visited again by ornithologists until 1973, by which time the bird was extinct, presumably due to predation by introduced rats. Bloxam noted that in 1825, only two years after the arrival of the first Europeans, they "saw quantities of rats with long tails, different in appearance from the common South Sea rat and resembling in colour and almost in size the Norway rat". Thus, and considering the vulnerability of other ''Aplonis'' species to rat predation, it can be assumed that the species became extinct soon thereafter.

The mystery and its resolution

There was much uncertainty surrounding the specimen, as it had no information on its place of origin or date of collection. Sharpe is the origin of much of this confusion, but it actually started with Buller's 1887 description, when he misread the name on the label. Sharpe corrected this to ''inornata'', but this was both unjustified (as Buller apparently really believed to have read ''mavornata'') and in any case preoccupied, as Salvadori had already named another starling ''Calornis inornata''
Today, this bird is classified as ''Aplonis metallica inornata'', the subspecies of the metallic starling occurring on the Cenderawasih Bay islands. According to ICZN rules, a species or subspecies name must only be used once per genus to avoid two taxa having the same name if subspecies are split or species lumped. in 1880. Thus, although Buller's description – a few throwaway lines in an account of the striated starling referring to the unique specimen – is barely sufficient and his name nonsensical, it is nonetheless valid according to ICZN rules.

There exists
drawing
by Georg Forster, made on June 1, 1774, and some notes of a bird collected on Rai’atea (formerly known as Ulieta) between May 14 and June 1 (popularised in Martin Davies' 2005 novel '' The Conjurer's Bird'' as the "Mysterious Bird of Ulieta"). Sharpe and many subsequent authors claimed that the bird on the painting was the same species as the specimen, despite numerous discrepancies between the specimen and Forster's description. Stresemann debunked this theory thoroughly, but writers did not stop referring ''A. mavornata'' to Forster's bird, connecting it with the Society Islands or with Cook's second voyage. Only in 1986, when Olson published the results of his research, which included analysis of Bloxam's original diary and notes and concluded that his "Sturnus Mautiensis" can be identified with Buller's ''A. mavornata'', was the mystery of Specimen 12.192 resolved. Since Bloxam's notes were originally published in a much bowdlerized and misleading edition where it is only mentioned that they "...saw ..a starling..." without any details and especially no reference to a specimen, the true origin of the mysterious starling was long overlooked.

In an ironic twist, Forster's bird, which had long puzzled ornithologists and was sometimes called "the mysterious bird of Raiatea" and variously considered a thrush or honeyeater is almost certainly another now-extinct species of ''Aplonis'' – thus, one could say that there are indeed two, not one species of "mysterious starling" from Pacific islands.

References

External links

Species factsheet
- BirdLife International

{{Taxonbar, from=Q1458268

Mauke starling
Birds of the Cook Islands
Extinct birds of Oceania
Bird extinctions since 1500
Mauke starling
Mauke starling
Species known from a single specimen