Lamé coefficients

In geometry, curvilinear coordinates are a coordinate system for Euclidean space in which the coordinate lines may be curved. These coordinates may be derived from a set of Cartesian coordinates by using a transformation that is locally invertible (a one-to-one map) at each point. This means that one can convert a point given in a Cartesian coordinate system to its curvilinear coordinates and back. The name ''curvilinear coordinates'', coined by the French mathematician Lamé, derives from the fact that the coordinate surfaces of the curvilinear systems are curved.

Well-known examples of curvilinear coordinate systems in three-dimensional Euclidean space (R³) are cylindrical and spherical coordinates. A Cartesian coordinate surface in this space is a coordinate plane; for example ''z'' = 0 defines the ''x''-''y'' plane. In the same space, the coordinate surface ''r'' = 1 in spherical coordinates is the surface of a unit sphere, which is curved. The formalism of curvilinear coordinates provides a unified and general description of the standard coordinate systems.

Curvilinear coordinates are often used to define the location or distribution of physical quantities which may be, for example, scalars, vectors, or tensors. Mathematical expressions involving these quantities in vector calculus and tensor analysis (such as the gradient, divergence, curl, and Laplacian) can be transformed from one coordinate system to another, according to transformation rules for scalars, vectors, and tensors. Such expressions then become valid for any curvilinear coordinate system.

A curvilinear coordinate system may be simpler to use than the Cartesian coordinate system for some applications. The motion of particles under the influence of central forces is usually easier to solve in spherical coordinates than in Cartesian coordinates; this is true of many physical problems with spherical symmetry defined in R³. Equations with boundary conditions that follow coordinate surfaces for a particular curvilinear coordinate system may be easier to solve in that system. While one might describe the motion of a particle in a rectangular box using Cartesian coordinates, it's easier to describe the motion in a sphere with spherical coordinates. Spherical coordinates are the most common curvilinear coordinate systems and are used in Earth sciences, cartography, quantum mechanics, relativity, and engineering.

Orthogonal curvilinear coordinates in 3 dimensions

Coordinates, basis, and vectors

For now, consider 3-D space. A point ''P'' in 3d space (or its position vector r) can be defined using Cartesian coordinates (''x'', ''y'', ''z'') quivalently written (''x''¹, ''x''², ''x''³) by $\mathbf = x \mathbf_x + y\mathbf_y + z\mathbf_z$, where e_''x'', e_''y'', e_''z'' are the '' standard basis vectors''.

It can also be defined by its curvilinear coordinates (''q''¹, ''q''², ''q''³) if this triplet of numbers defines a single point in an unambiguous way. The relation between the coordinates is then given by the invertible transformation functions:

:$x = f^1(q^1, q^2, q^3),\, y = f^2(q^1, q^2, q^3),\, z = f^3(q^1, q^2, q^3)$
:$q^1 = g^1(x,y,z),\, q^2 = g^2(x,y,z),\, q^3 = g^3(x,y,z)$

The surfaces ''q''¹ = constant, ''q''² = constant, ''q''³ = constant are called the coordinate surfaces; and the space curves formed by their intersection in pairs are called the coordinate curves. The coordinate axes are determined by the tangents to the coordinate curves at the intersection of three surfaces. They are not in general fixed directions in space, which happens to be the case for simple Cartesian coordinates, and thus there is generally no natural global basis for curvilinear coordinates.

In the Cartesian system, the standard basis vectors can be derived from the derivative of the location of point ''P'' with respect to the local coordinate

:$\mathbf_x = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_y = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_z = \dfrac.$

Applying the same derivatives to the curvilinear system locally at point ''P'' defines the natural basis vectors:

:$\mathbf_1 = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_2 = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_3 = \dfrac.$

Such a basis, whose vectors change their direction and/or magnitude from point to point is called a local basis. All bases associated with curvilinear coordinates are necessarily local. Basis vectors that are the same at all points are global bases, and can be associated only with linear or affine coordinate systems.

For this article e is reserved for the standard basis (Cartesian) and h or b is for the curvilinear basis.

These may not have unit length, and may also not be orthogonal. In the case that they ''are'' orthogonal at all points where the derivatives are well-defined, we define the Lamé coefficients (after Gabriel Lamé) by

:$h_1 = , \mathbf_1, ; \; h_2 = , \mathbf_2, ; \; h_3 = , \mathbf_3,$

and the curvilinear orthonormal basis vectors by

:$\mathbf_1 = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_2 = \dfrac; \; \mathbf_3 = \dfrac.$

These basis vectors may well depend upon the position of ''P''; it is therefore necessary that they are not assumed to be constant over a region. (They technically form a basis for the tangent bundle of $\mathbb^3$ at ''P'', and so are local to ''P''.)

In general, curvilinear coordinates allow the natural basis vectors h_i not all mutually perpendicular to each other, and not required to be of unit length: they can be of arbitrary magnitude and direction. The use of an orthogonal basis makes vector manipulations simpler than for non-orthogonal. However, some areas of physics and engineering, particularly fluid mechanics and continuum mechanics, require non-orthogonal bases to describe deformations and fluid transport to account for complicated directional dependences of physical quantities. A discussion of the general case appears later on this page.

Vector calculus

Differential elements

In orthogonal curvilinear coordinates, since the total differential change in r is

:$d\mathbf=\dfracdq^1 + \dfracdq^2 + \dfracdq^3 = h_1 dq^1 \mathbf_1 + h_2 dq^2 \mathbf_2 + h_3 dq^3 \mathbf_3$

so scale factors are $h_i = \left, \frac\$

In non-orthogonal coordinates the length of $d\mathbf= dq^1 \mathbf_1 + dq^2 \mathbf_2 + dq^3 \mathbf_3$ is the positive square root of $d\mathbf \cdot d\mathbf = dq^i dq^j \mathbf_i \cdot \mathbf_j$ (with Einstein summation convention). The six independent scalar products ''g_ij''=h_''i''.h_''j'' of the natural basis vectors generalize the three scale factors defined above for orthogonal coordinates. The nine ''g_ij'' are the components of the metric tensor, which has only three non zero components in orthogonal coordinates: ''g''₁₁=''h''₁''h''₁, ''g''₂₂=''h''₂''h''₂, ''g''₃₃=''h''₃''h''₃.

Covariant and contravariant bases

Spatial gradients, distances, time derivatives and scale factors are interrelated within a coordinate system by two groups of basis vectors:

# basis vectors that are locally tangent to their associated coordinate pathline: $\mathbf_i=\dfrac$ are contravariant vectors (denoted by lowered indices), and
# basis vectors that are locally normal to the isosurface created by the other coordinates: $\mathbf^i=\nabla q^i$ are covariant vectors (denoted by raised indices), ∇ is the del operator.

Note that, because of Einstein's summation convention, the position of the indices of the vectors is the opposite of that of the coordinates.

Consequently, a general curvilinear coordinate system has two sets of basis vectors for every point: is the contravariant basis, and is the covariant (a.k.a. reciprocal) basis. The covariant and contravariant basis vectors types have identical direction for orthogonal curvilinear coordinate systems, but as usual have inverted units with respect to each other.

Note the following important equality:
$\mathbf^i\cdot\mathbf_j = \delta^i_j$
wherein $\delta^i_j$ denotes the generalized Kronecker delta.

A vector v can be specified in terms of either basis, i.e.,

:$\mathbf = v^1\mathbf_1 + v^2\mathbf_2 + v^3\mathbf_3 = v_1\mathbf^1 + v_2\mathbf^2 + v_3\mathbf^3$

Using the Einstein summation convention, the basis vectors relate to the components by
:$\mathbf\cdot\mathbf^i = v^k\mathbf_k\cdot\mathbf^i = v^k\delta^i_k = v^i$
:$\mathbf\cdot\mathbf_i = v_k\mathbf^k\cdot\mathbf_i = v_k\delta_i^k = v_i$
and
:$\mathbf\cdot\mathbf_i = v^k\mathbf_k\cdot\mathbf_i = g_v^k$
:$\mathbf\cdot\mathbf^i = v_k\mathbf^k\cdot\mathbf^i = g^v_k$
where ''g'' is the metric tensor (see below).

A vector can be specified with covariant coordinates (lowered indices, written ''v_k'') or contravariant coordinates (raised indices, written ''v^k''). From the above vector sums, it can be seen that contravariant coordinates are associated with covariant basis vectors, and covariant coordinates are associated with contravariant basis vectors.

A key feature of the representation of vectors and tensors in terms of indexed components and basis vectors is ''invariance'' in the sense that vector components which transform in a covariant manner (or contravariant manner) are paired with basis vectors that transform in a contravariant manner (or covariant manner).

Integration

Constructing a covariant basis in one dimension

Consider the one-dimensional curve shown in Fig. 3. At point ''P'', taken as an origin, ''x'' is one of the Cartesian coordinates, and ''q''¹ is one of the curvilinear coordinates. The local (non-unit) basis vector is b₁ (notated h₁ above, with b reserved for unit vectors) and it is built on the ''q''¹ axis which is a tangent to that coordinate line at the point ''P''. The axis ''q''¹ and thus the vector b₁ form an angle $\alpha$ with the Cartesian ''x'' axis and the Cartesian basis vector e₁.

It can be seen from triangle ''PAB'' that
:$\cos \alpha = \cfrac \quad \Rightarrow \quad , \mathbf_1, = , \mathbf_1, \cos \alpha$
where , e₁, , , b₁, are the magnitudes of the two basis vectors, i.e., the scalar intercepts ''PB'' and ''PA''. ''PA'' is also the projection of b₁ on the ''x'' axis.

However, this method for basis vector transformations using ''directional cosines'' is inapplicable to curvilinear coordinates for the following reasons:
#By increasing the distance from ''P'', the angle between the curved line ''q''¹ and Cartesian axis ''x'' increasingly deviates from $\alpha$.
#At the distance ''PB'' the true angle is that which the tangent at point C forms with the ''x'' axis and the latter angle is clearly different from $\alpha$.

The angles that the ''q''¹ line and that axis form with the ''x'' axis become closer in value the closer one moves towards point ''P'' and become exactly equal at ''P''.

Let point ''E'' be located very close to ''P'', so close that the distance ''PE'' is infinitesimally small. Then ''PE'' measured on the ''q''¹ axis almost coincides with ''PE'' measured on the ''q''¹ line. At the same time, the ratio ''PD/PE'' (''PD'' being the projection of ''PE'' on the ''x'' axis) becomes almost exactly equal to $\cos\alpha$.

Let the infinitesimally small intercepts ''PD'' and ''PE'' be labelled, respectively, as ''dx'' and d''q''¹. Then
:$\cos \alpha = \cfrac = \frac$.

Thus, the directional cosines can be substituted in transformations with the more exact ratios between infinitesimally small coordinate intercepts. It follows that the component (projection) of b₁ on the ''x'' axis is

:$p^1 = \mathbf_1\cdot\cfrac = , \mathbf_1, \cfrac\cos\alpha = , \mathbf_1, \cfrac \quad \Rightarrow \quad \cfrac = \cfrac$.

If ''qⁱ'' = ''qⁱ''(''x''₁, ''x''₂, ''x''₃) and ''x_i'' = ''x_i''(''q''¹, ''q''², ''q''³) are smooth (continuously differentiable) functions the transformation ratios can be written as $\cfrac$ and $\cfrac$. That is, those ratios are partial derivatives of coordinates belonging to one system with respect to coordinates belonging to the other system.

Constructing a covariant basis in three dimensions

Doing the same for the coordinates in the other 2 dimensions, b₁ can be expressed as:
:$\mathbf_1 = p^1\mathbf_1 + p^2\mathbf_2 + p^3\mathbf_3 = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3$
Similar equations hold for b₂ and b₃ so that the standard basis is transformed to a local (ordered and ''normalised'') basis by the following system of equations:

:$\begin \mathbf_1 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \\ \mathbf_2 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \\ \mathbf_3 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \end$

By analogous reasoning, one can obtain the inverse transformation from local basis to standard basis:
:$\begin \mathbf_1 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \\ \mathbf_2 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \\ \mathbf_3 & = \cfrac \mathbf_1 + \cfrac \mathbf_2 + \cfrac \mathbf_3 \end$

Jacobian of the transformation

The above systems of linear equations can be written in matrix form using the Einstein summation convention as
:$\cfrac \mathbf_i = \mathbf_k, \quad \cfrac \mathbf_i = \mathbf_k$.

This coefficient matrix of the linear system is the Jacobian matrix (and its inverse) of the transformation. These are the equations that can be used to transform a Cartesian basis into a curvilinear basis, and vice versa.

In three dimensions, the expanded forms of these matrices are
:$\mathbf = \begin \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \end,\quad \mathbf^ = \begin \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \cfrac & \cfrac & \cfrac \\ \end$

In the inverse transformation (second equation system), the unknowns are the curvilinear basis vectors. For any specific location there can only exist one and only one set of basis vectors (else the basis is not well defined at that point). This condition is satisfied if and only if the equation system has a single solution. In linear algebra, a linear equation system has a single solution (non-trivial) only if the determinant of its system matrix is non-zero:
:$\det(\mathbf^) \neq 0$
which shows the rationale behind the above requirement concerning the inverse Jacobian determinant.

Generalization to ''n'' dimensions

The formalism extends to any finite dimension as follows.

Consider the real Euclidean ''n''-dimensional space, that is R^''n'' = R × R × ... × R (''n'' times) where R is the set of real numbers and × denotes the Cartesian product, which is a vector space.

The coordinates of this space can be denoted by: x = (''x''₁, ''x''₂,...,''x_n''). Since this is a vector (an element of the vector space), it can be written as:

:$\mathbf = \sum_^n x_i\mathbf^i$

where e¹ = (1,0,0...,0), e² = (0,1,0...,0), e³ = (0,0,1...,0),...,e^''n'' = (0,0,0...,1) is the '' standard basis set of vectors'' for the space R^''n'', and ''i'' = 1, 2,...''n'' is an index labelling components. Each vector has exactly one component in each dimension (or "axis") and they are mutually orthogonal (perpendicular) and normalized (has unit magnitude).

More generally, we can define basis vectors b_''i'' so that they depend on q = (''q''₁, ''q''₂,...,''q_n''), i.e. they change from point to point: b_''i'' = b_''i''(q). In which case to define the same point x in terms of this alternative basis: the '' coordinates'' with respect to this basis ''v_i'' also necessarily depend on x also, that is ''v_i'' = ''v_i''(x). Then a vector v in this space, with respect to these alternative coordinates and basis vectors, can be expanded as a linear combination in this basis (which simply means to multiply each basis vector e_''i'' by a number ''v''_''i'' – scalar multiplication):

:$\mathbf = \sum_^n \bar^j\mathbf_j = \sum_^n \bar^j(\mathbf)\mathbf_j(\mathbf)$

The vector sum that describes v in the new basis is composed of different vectors, although the sum itself remains the same.

Transformation of coordinates

From a more general and abstract perspective, a curvilinear coordinate system is simply a coordinate patch on the differentiable manifold Eⁿ (n-dimensional Euclidean space) that is diffeomorphic to the Cartesian coordinate patch on the manifold. Two diffeomorphic coordinate patches on a differential manifold need not overlap differentiably. With this simple definition of a curvilinear coordinate system, all the results that follow below are simply applications of standard theorems in differential topology.

The transformation functions are such that there's a one-to-one relationship between points in the "old" and "new" coordinates, that is, those functions are bijections, and fulfil the following requirements within their domains:

Vector and tensor algebra in three-dimensional curvilinear coordinates

Elementary vector and tensor algebra in curvilinear coordinates is used in some of the older scientific literature in mechanics and physics and can be indispensable to understanding work from the early and mid-1900s, for example the text by Green and Zerna. Some useful relations in the algebra of vectors and second-order tensors in curvilinear coordinates are given in this section. The notation and contents are primarily from Ogden, Naghdi, Simmonds, Green and Zerna, Basar and Weichert, and Ciarlet.

Tensors in curvilinear coordinates

A second-order tensor can be expressed as
:$\boldsymbol = S^\mathbf_i\otimes\mathbf_j = S^i_j\mathbf_i\otimes\mathbf^j = S_i^j\mathbf^i\otimes\mathbf_j = S_\mathbf^i\otimes\mathbf^j$
where $\scriptstyle\otimes$ denotes the tensor product. The components ''S^ij'' are called the contravariant components, ''Sⁱ _j'' the mixed right-covariant components, ''S_i ^j'' the mixed left-covariant components, and ''S_ij'' the covariant components of the second-order tensor. The components of the second-order tensor are related by

:$S^ = g^S_k^j = g^S^i_k = g^g^S_$

The metric tensor in orthogonal curvilinear coordinates

At each point, one can construct a small line element , so the square of the length of the line element is the scalar product dx • dx and is called the metric of the space, given by:

:$d\mathbf\cdot d\mathbf = \cfrac\cfracdq^jdq^k$.

The following portion of the above equation
:$\cfrac\cfrac = g_(q^i,q^j) = \mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_j$
is a ''symmetric'' tensor called the fundamental (or metric) tensor of the Euclidean space in curvilinear coordinates.

Indices can be raised and lowered by the metric:
:$v^i = g^v_k$

Relation to Lamé coefficients

Defining the scale factors ''h_i'' by

:$h_ih_j = g_ = \mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_j \quad \Rightarrow \quad h_i =\sqrt= \left, \mathbf_i\=\left, \cfrac\$

gives a relation between the metric tensor and the Lamé coefficients, and

:$g_ = \cfrac\cdot\cfrac = \left( h_\mathbf_k\right)\cdot\left( h_\mathbf_m\right) = h_h_$

where ''h_ij'' are the Lamé coefficients. For an orthogonal basis we also have:

:$g = g_g_g_ = h_1^2h_2^2h_3^2 \quad \Rightarrow \quad \sqrt = h_1h_2h_3 = J$

Example: Polar coordinates

If we consider polar coordinates for R²,
:$(x, y)=(r \cos \theta, r \sin \theta)$
(r, θ) are the curvilinear coordinates, and the Jacobian determinant of the transformation (''r'',θ) → (''r'' cos θ, ''r'' sin θ) is ''r''.

The orthogonal basis vectors are b_''r'' = (cos θ, sin θ), b_θ = (−r sin θ, r cos θ). The scale factors are ''h''_''r'' = 1 and ''h''_θ= ''r''. The fundamental tensor is ''g''₁₁ =1, ''g''₂₂ =''r''², ''g''₁₂ = ''g''₂₁ =0.

The alternating tensor

In an orthonormal right-handed basis, the third-order alternating tensor is defined as

:$\boldsymbol = \varepsilon_\mathbf^i\otimes\mathbf^j\otimes\mathbf^k$

In a general curvilinear basis the same tensor may be expressed as

:$\boldsymbol = \mathcal_\mathbf^i\otimes\mathbf^j\otimes\mathbf^k = \mathcal^\mathbf_i\otimes\mathbf_j\otimes\mathbf_k$

It can also be shown that
:$\mathcal^ = \cfrac\varepsilon_ = \cfrac\varepsilon_$

Christoffel symbols

;Christoffel symbols of the first kind $\Gamma_$:

:$\mathbf_ = \frac = \mathbf^k \Gamma_ \quad \Rightarrow \quad \mathbf_k \cdot \mathbf_ = \Gamma_$

where the comma denotes a partial derivative (see Ricci calculus). To express Γ_''kij'' in terms of ''g_ij'',

:$\begin g_ & = (\mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_j)_ = \mathbf_\cdot\mathbf_j + \mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_ = \Gamma_ + \Gamma_\\ g_ & = (\mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_k)_ = \mathbf_\cdot\mathbf_k + \mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_ = \Gamma_ + \Gamma_\\ g_ & = (\mathbf_j\cdot\mathbf_k)_ = \mathbf_\cdot\mathbf_k + \mathbf_j\cdot\mathbf_ = \Gamma_ + \Gamma_ \end$

Since
:$\mathbf_ = \mathbf_\quad\Rightarrow\quad\Gamma_ = \Gamma_$
using these to rearrange the above relations gives

:\Gamma_ = \frac(g_ + g_ - g_) = \frac \mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_k)_ + (\mathbf_j\cdot\mathbf_k)_ - (\mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf_j)_

;Christoffel symbols of the second kind $\Gamma^k_$:

:$\Gamma^k_ = g^\Gamma_ = \Gamma^k_,\quad \cfrac = \mathbf_k \Gamma^k_$

This implies that
:$\Gamma^k_ = \cfrac\cdot\mathbf^k = -\mathbf_i\cdot\cfrac\quad$ since $\quad\cfrac(\mathbf_i\cdot\mathbf^k)=0$.

Other relations that follow are
:$\cfrac = -\Gamma^i_\mathbf^k,\quad \boldsymbol\mathbf_i = \Gamma^k_\mathbf_k\otimes\mathbf^j,\quad \boldsymbol\mathbf^i = -\Gamma^i_\mathbf^k\otimes\mathbf^j$

Vector operations

Vector and tensor calculus in three-dimensional curvilinear coordinates

Adjustments need to be made in the calculation of line, surface and volume integrals. For simplicity, the following restricts to three dimensions and orthogonal curvilinear coordinates. However, the same arguments apply for ''n''-dimensional spaces. When the coordinate system is not orthogonal, there are some additional terms in the expressions.

Simmonds, in his book on tensor analysis, quotes Albert Einstein saying

The magic of this theory will hardly fail to impose itself on anybody who has truly understood it; it represents a genuine triumph of the method of absolute differential calculus, founded by Gauss, Riemann, Ricci, and Levi-Civita.

Vector and tensor calculus in general curvilinear coordinates is used in tensor analysis on four-dimensional curvilinear manifolds in general relativity, in the mechanics of curved shells, in examining the invariance properties of Maxwell's equations which has been of interest in metamaterials and in many other fields.

Some useful relations in the calculus of vectors and second-order tensors in curvilinear coordinates are given in this section. The notation and contents are primarily from Ogden, Simmonds, Green and Zerna, Basar and Weichert, and Ciarlet.

Let φ = φ(x) be a well defined scalar field and v = v(x) a well-defined vector field, and ''λ''₁, ''λ''₂... be parameters of the coordinates

Geometric elements

Integration

:

Differentiation

The expressions for the gradient, divergence, and Laplacian can be directly extended to ''n''-dimensions, however the curl is only defined in 3D.

The vector field b_''i'' is tangent to the ''qⁱ'' coordinate curve and forms a natural basis at each point on the curve. This basis, as discussed at the beginning of this article, is also called the covariant curvilinear basis. We can also define a reciprocal basis, or contravariant curvilinear basis, b^''i''. All the algebraic relations between the basis vectors, as discussed in the section on tensor algebra, apply for the natural basis and its reciprocal at each point x.

:

Fictitious forces in general curvilinear coordinates

By definition, if a particle with no forces acting on it has its position expressed in an inertial coordinate system, (''x''₁, ''x''₂, ''x''₃, ''t''), then there it will have no acceleration (d²''x''_''j''/d''t''² = 0). In this context, a coordinate system can fail to be “inertial” either due to non-straight time axis or non-straight space axes (or both). In other words, the basis vectors of the coordinates may vary in time at fixed positions, or they may vary with position at fixed times, or both. When equations of motion are expressed in terms of any non-inertial coordinate system (in this sense), extra terms appear, called Christoffel symbols. Strictly speaking, these terms represent components of the absolute acceleration (in classical mechanics), but we may also choose to continue to regard d²''x''_''j''/d''t''² as the acceleration (as if the coordinates were inertial) and treat the extra terms as if they were forces, in which case they are called fictitious forces. The component of any such fictitious force normal to the path of the particle and in the plane of the path's curvature is then called centrifugal force.

This more general context makes clear the correspondence between the concepts of centrifugal force in rotating coordinate systems and in stationary curvilinear coordinate systems. (Both of these concepts appear frequently in the literature.) For a simple example, consider a particle of mass ''m'' moving in a circle of radius ''r'' with angular speed ''w'' relative to a system of polar coordinates rotating with angular speed ''W''. The radial equation of motion is ''mr''” = ''F''_''r'' + ''mr''(''w'' + ''W'')². Thus the centrifugal force is ''mr'' times the square of the absolute rotational speed ''A'' = ''w'' + ''W'' of the particle. If we choose a coordinate system rotating at the speed of the particle, then ''W'' = ''A'' and ''w'' = 0, in which case the centrifugal force is ''mrA''², whereas if we choose a stationary coordinate system we have ''W'' = 0 and ''w'' = ''A'', in which case the centrifugal force is again ''mrA''². The reason for this equality of results is that in both cases the basis vectors at the particle's location are changing in time in exactly the same way. Hence these are really just two different ways of describing exactly the same thing, one description being in terms of rotating coordinates and the other being in terms of stationary curvilinear coordinates, both of which are non-inertial according to the more abstract meaning of that term.

When describing general motion, the actual forces acting on a particle are often referred to the instantaneous osculating circle tangent to the path of motion, and this circle in the general case is not centered at a fixed location, and so the decomposition into centrifugal and Coriolis components is constantly changing. This is true regardless of whether the motion is described in terms of stationary or rotating coordinates.

See also

* Covariance and contravariance
* Introduction to the mathematics of general relativity
* Special cases:
** Orthogonal coordinates
** Skew coordinates
* Tensors in curvilinear coordinates
* Frenet–Serret formulas
* Covariant derivative
* Tensor derivative (continuum mechanics)
* Curvilinear perspective
* Del in cylindrical and spherical coordinates

References

Further reading

*
*

External links

Planetmath.org Derivation of Unit vectors in curvilinear coordinates



Prof. R. Brannon's E-Book on Curvilinear Coordinates
* Wikiversity:Introduction to Elasticity/Tensors#The divergence of a tensor field – Wikiversity, Introduction to Elasticity/Tensors.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Curvilinear Coordinates
Coordinate systems
*3