Biography
Louise Weinberg was educated at Cornell (A.B. summa) (Phi Beta Kappa), and Harvard (J.D. 1969, LL.M. 1974). She clerked for Judge Charles Edward Wyzanski Jr. and was an associate in litigation at Bingham, Dana & Gould, Boston. At Harvard, Brandeis, and Stanford she taught courses in the American legal system, constitutional law, Supreme Court history, federal courts, and the conflict of laws. In 1980 she joined the law faculty at the University of Texas, where she held the Raybourn Thompson professorship, and, later, the endowed William B. Bates Chair in the Administration of Justice, formerly held byContributions to legal theory
In 1977 Weinberg introduced the concept of "judicial federalism." She engaged in a 1989 debate with Martin Redish concerning controversial federal judicial lawmaking, and clarified the nature of federal common law. Weinberg concentrated on choice-of-law theory, and proposed a reconceptualization of the field, ultimately achieving a unification of the concepts of due process, rationality, and tiered scrutiny with choice of law. Weinberg became interested in uncovering hidden rationales in Supreme Court cases, and in this interest clarified the causative role of the Dred Scott case in the coming of the Civil War, countering revisionist normalization of Dred Scott while showing that judicial attempts to reverse Dred Scott, as opposed to constitutional amendment, would have been counterproductive. In 2003, whenPublications
BOOKS: *''Federal Courts: Judicial Federalism and Judicial Power'' (West Pub. Co., 1200 pp. 1994) & Supps. *''Conflict of Laws'' (Matthew Bender 2011, 2002, 1996) (co-authors William Richman and William Reynolds). RECENT SCHOLARLY PAPERS: *''Sovereign Immunity and Interstate Government Tort'', 54 U. MICH. J. L. Rev. 1-85 (2020) *''Age of Unreason: Rationality and the Regulatory State'', 53 U. MICH. J. L. REF. 1-80 (2019) *''Luther v. Borden: A Taney-Court Mystery Solved'', 37 PACE LAW REVIEW 700-764 (2017) *''A Radically Transformed Restatement for Conflicts'', 2015 U. OF ILLINOIS L. REV. 1999–2052 (2015) *''What We Don't Talk About When We Talk About Extraterritoriality: Kiobel and the Conflict of Laws,'' 99 CORNELL L. REV. 1471–1531 (2014) *''A General Theory of Governance: Due Process and Lawmaking Power'', 54 WM. & MARY L. REV. 1057–1121 (2013) *''Unlikely Beginnings of Modern Constitutional Thought'', 15 U. PA. J. CONST. L. 291-330 (2012) EARLIER NOTABLE PAPERS: *Courts, United States Federal," THE OXFORD INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LEGAL HISTORY 255-262 (2009) *''Dred Scott and the Crisis of 1860'', in Symposium, 82 CHI-KENT L. REV. 97-140 (2007) *''Theory Wars in the Conflict of Laws'', 103 MICH. L. REV. 1631–1670 (2005). *''Our Marbury'', 89 VA. L. REV. 1235–1412 (2003) *"Of Theory and Theodicy: The Problem of Immoral Law," in LAW AND JUSTICE IN A MULTISTATE WORLD: A TRIBUTE TO ARTHUR T. VON MEHREN, 473-502 (Symeon Symeonides, ed. 2002) *''When Courts Decide Elections: The Constitutionality of Bush v. Gore'', in Symposium, 82 B.U. L. REV. 609-666 (2002). *''Of Sovereignty and Union: The Legends of Alden'', 76 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1113–1182 (2001). *''Holmes' Failure'', 96 MICH. L. REV. 691-723 (1997) *''The Federal-State Conflict of Laws: "Actual" Conflicts'', 70 TEX. L. REV. 1743–1798 (1992) *''Against Comity'', 80 GEORGETOWN L. J. 53-94 (1991) *''The Monroe Mystery Solved: Beyond the "Unhappy History" Theory of Civil Rights Litigation'', in Symposium, 1991 B.Y.U. L. REV. 737-765 (1991) *''Federal Common Law'', 83 NW. U. L. REV. 805-852 (1989) *''Choice of Law and Minimal Scrutiny'', 49 U. CHI. L. REV. 440-488 (1982). *''The New Judicial Federalism'', 29 STAN. L. REV. 1191–1244 (1977) CONTRIBUTED: * ''Courts, United States Federal'', in II THE OXFORD INTERNATIONAL ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LEGAL HISTORY 255-262 (2009) *''Of Theory and Theodicy: The Problem of Immoral Law'', LAW AND JUSTICE IN A MULTISTATE WORLD 473-502 (Symeonides ed., 2002) *''A New Judicial Federalism? A NEW AMERICA?'' (Graubard ed., 1978) ANTHOLOGIZED: *''On Departing from Forum Law'', A CONFLICT-OF-LAWS ANTHOLOGY 122 (Gene R. Shreve ed. 1997, 2012). *''Choice of Law and Minimal Scrutiny'', A CONFLICT-OF-LAWS ANTHOLOGY 339 (Gene R. Shreve, ed. 1997, 2012). *''The New Judicial Federalism'', in FEDERALISM (A J. Bellia, ed., 2011). *''Federal Common Law'', FEDERALISM (A. J. Bellia ed. 2011) PROCEEDINGS: *''The Economic Rights of Individuals'', PROCEEDINGS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING—THE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY OF TEXAS (2017) *Motion and Debate, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, 79TH ANNUAL MEETING, at 468-9, 481-3, 485-6 (2002.). *Motion and Debate, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, ,70TH ANNUAL MEETING at 255, 262, 267-68, 274-75 (1993) (Reprinted in part, 54 LA. L. REV. 837 (1994) by editors of the review as basis of a Symposium). *Motion and Debate, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, 69TH ANNUAL MEETING, at 211-216 (1992) (motion carried). *Motion and Debate, in PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE, 65th ANNUAL MEETING, at 229-337 (motion carried); Comments, 344-45 (1988). CITED BY: *Supreme Court of the United States, ''Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Shutts'', Justice Stevens, concurring and dissenting (1985) (slip op.) *Justice Stephen Breyer, MAKING OUR DEMOCRACY WORK: A JUDGE'S VIEW (2014) (variously citing Weinberg's Our Marbury.) *Peter S. Canellos, THE GREAT DISSENTER (2021), at 486, 565. *Edward A. Purcell, Jr., BRANDEIS AND THE PROGRESSIVE CONSTITUTION (2000) (Chapter IV in entirety) *Stuart, CONCEPTS OF FEDERALISM (1979) *United States Court of Appeals (5th Cir.. 2020) *United States Court of Appeals (4th Cir. 2016) *United States Court of Appeals (D.C. Cir. 2010) *United States District Court, Eastern Dist. N.Y. (2000) *Supreme Court of New Jersey (2008) *Court of Appeals of Arizona (1997)References
Direct links
*External links