Keeping It Real Art Critics

''Keeping It Real Art Critics'' (also known as ''KIRAC'') is a web series on YouTube and Vimeo exploring the international art world. Directed by Stefan Ruitenbeek, a Dutch artist and director, ''KIRAC'' episodes occupy the middle ground between art and art criticism and focus mainly on the influence of modernistic, democratic principles within the art world. In the Netherlands, the platform has gained both praise and notoriety as a result of its confrontational, dialectical approach.

For a large part, ''KIRAC'' episodes consist of conversations that take place within Ruitenbeek’s personal sphere. Contributors to this dialogue, whether friends or enemies, are all said to be part of “Team ''KIRAC''”. Because of their frequent and substantial appearances, archaeologist and philosopher Kate Sinha (1988, Deventer) and artist Tarik Sadouma (1979, Amsterdam) are often regarded as ''KIRAC'' co-directors.

Development

''KIRAC'' episodes have started appearing on YouTube since 2016. The early films can be interpreted as the result of Ruitenbeek, Sinha and Sadouma’s boredom with the modern art world and their frustration with the complacency of its representatives. They suggest (''KIRAC'' Ep.3) that democratic, modernistic tendencies in combination with neoliberal policies have created a generation of artists who use their work to cater for the ideological preferences of curators and collectors, thereby lacking sincerity and self-reflection. The first episodes discuss various examples of this dynamic and fit within the domain of art criticism, although their quality as such is sometimes said to be undermined by the use of populist rhetoric. Others maintain that this stylistic choice is part of a thought-provoking, albeit dangerous artistic game.

The qualification of art criticism however no longer applies to more recent releases, in which the narrative structure more and more is taking on a literary form. Shifting from critique to art, ''KIRAC'' demonstrates the constructive nature of its criticism and its wish to transform the art world by portraying it. In this regard, Ruitenbeek has explicitly talked about his “paradigm shift”, which must include artists and curators as well as art collectors. For example, ''KIRAC'' Episodes 16, 17, 18 and 19 tried to bring about a change of character with collector Philip van den Hurk, alluring his protestant, profit-minded attitude with aristocratic perspectives.

Using the art world as a stepping stone, ''KIRAC'' has also applied its critical method to more general domains of perceived political correctness, such as immigration (''KIRAC'' Ep.14) and sexual consent (''KIRAC'' Ep.9). Ruitenbeek:

I want to make art about the trench warfare that is going on between the left and the right. I think it is part of the world we are living in. ��They are recruiting me on the right, where they want to see me as a predator hunting for leftists. And you see the same thing happening on the left, where they say: ‘actually you’re giving great, leftist criticism of the system.’ That’s what I find attractive.

Episodes

''KIRAC'' Ep.1 ‘Verontwaardiging in De Appel’ (Indignation at De Appel)

''KIRAC'' Ep.2 ‘Niet op deze manier’ (Not in this way)

''KIRAC'' Ep.3 ‘De Kunstsubsidiediscussie’ (The Art Subsidy Discussion)

''KIRAC'' Ep.4 ‘The psychology of Jon Rafman’

''KIRAC'' Ep.5 ‘The Tears of Mara McCarthy’

''KIRAC'' Ep.6 ‘De werken van Renzo Martens’ (also published in English: The works of Renzo Martens)

''KIRAC'' Ep.7 ‘Indigenous Flags and Modernism’

''KIRAC'' Ep.8 ‘The Art of Stefan Simchowitz’ (in English)

''KIRAC'' Ep.9 ‘Who’s Afraid of Harvey Weinstein’

''KIRAC'' Ep.10 ‘The bad breath of Mondriaan specialist Hans Janssen’

''KIRAC'' Ep.11 ‘Medusa’

''KIRAC'' Ep.12 ‘100% Integrity’

''KIRAC'' Ep.13 ‘Stigma’ (the Netflix deal)

''KIRAC'' Ep.14 ‘Problem Child’

''KIRAC'' Ep.15 ‘Time’s Up, Old Man’

''KIRAC'' Ep.16 ‘King Philip and the Pied Flycatcher’

''KIRAC'' Ep.17 ‘Blackmail’

''KIRAC'' Ep.18 ‘Parasites and Pecan Pie'

''KIRAC'' Ep.19 'The Goat'

''KIRAC'' Ep.20 ‘The Latent Potency of Rob Defares’ XTENDED VERSIONbr>
''KIRAC'' Ep.21 ‘Buse’ (A Good Student)

''KIRAC'' Ep.22 ‘Reasons of Ego’

''KIRAC'' Ep.23 ‘Honey Pot’

''KIRAC'' Ep.24 ‘Under a Sinking Sun’

''KIRAC'' Ep.25 ‘Male Love’

''KIRAC'' Ep.26 ‘Cornucopia’

''KIRAC'' Ep.27 ft. Houellebecq

''KIRAC'' Ep.28 ‘Faun’

Reception

Ever since the publication of ''KIRAC'' Ep.1 “Indignation at De Appel”, ''KIRAC'' has both been a topic of controversy and the subject of praise. In 2016, ''KIRAC'' was rejected funding by the Mondriaan Fonds, although the institution recognized the “necessity and artistic relevance” of the ''KIRAC'' discourse. The next year, however, funding was granted.

In 2018, the cancellation of a discussion about ''KIRAC'' Ep.13 at the Rietveld Academy made (inter)national headlines. The academy’s decision to withdraw the invitation was made after some outrage had arisen among its students at the announcement. Their opposition was particularly directed at Kate Sinha, who had written critically about Beatrix Ruf, curator of the Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam, and had illustrated her criticism with the example of a Zanele Muholi exhibition “where the audience was expected to be interested in the lazy works of a spoiled brat, only because she is South-African, lesbian and black.” The disinvitation was finally overturned and a new discussion was organized on the topic of the cancellation of the initial event. This discussion became the subject of ''KIRAC'' Ep.13.

As of 2023, ''KIRAC'' episodes have reached more than 1.250.000 views on YouTube.

References

{{reflist

Art criticism
YouTube
2016 web series debuts