Judicial Research and Training Institute

The Supreme Court of Korea () is the highest ordinary court in the judicial branch of South Korea, seated in Seocho, Seoul. Established under Chapter 5 of the Constitution of South Korea, the Court has ultimate and comprehensive jurisdiction over all cases except those cases falling under the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court of Korea. It consists of fourteen Justices, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea. The Supreme Court is at the top of the hierarchy of all ordinary courts in South Korea, and traditionally represented the conventional judiciary of South Korea. The Supreme Court has equivalent status as one of the two highest courts in South Korea. The other is the Constitutional Court of Korea.

History and Status

The first Constitution of South Korea established 'Supreme Court' and 'Constitutional Committee' ( ko, 헌법위원회) in Chapter 5. The Supreme Court was established as highest ordinary court without power of judicial review, while the committee was established as constitutional court with power of judicial review. This distribution of judicial power inside judiciary did not change under rule of South Korea's first president Syngman Rhee during First Republic. Later, fourth and fifth Constitution of Korea in the Second Republic of Korea during year 1960 kept the Supreme Court as highest ordinary court without power of judicial review. Though the Supreme Court had no power of judicial review, it was able to thrive judicial independence under legendary first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court named 'Kim Byung-ro' ( ko, 김병로) from 1948 to 1957. Renowned for ardent participation in Korean independence movement from colonization of Japan, Chief Justice Kim Byung-ro is also famous for defending independence of judicial powers from Syngman Rhee's dictatorship.

However, after Kim Byung-ro's retirement in 1957, the Supreme Court adapted itself under authoritarian dictatorships of Syngman Rhee and Park Chung-hee. By sentencing death on Syngman Rhee's political contender Cho Bong-am in 1959 and also by sentencing death on defendants of People's Revolutionary Party Incident in 1975 under Park Chung-hee's era, the Supreme Court gained notorious reputation for '' judicial murder'' ( ko, 사법살인) as obediently sentencing capital punishments over spy scandals fabricated by dictators. Though there was once a time in 1971 when the Supreme Court revolted institutionally against rule of President Park Chung-hee by exercising power of judicial review redistributed by the seventh Constitution of Third Republic which repealed the Constitutional Court of Second Republic. Yet this revolt was repressed without bloodshed, when the President Park Chung-hee refused reappointment of Supreme Court Justices which was traditionally expected at that time. From that time, as the Yushin Constitution in 1972 revitalized the Constitutional Committee with power of judicial review which can be initiated only by request from the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court never even tried to request judicial review to the committee until South Korea got democratized by June Struggle in 1987. This led South Korean politicians after democratization to build Constitutional Court of Korea with entirely independent power of judicial review which does not require the Supreme Court's request.

Nevertheless, of long dark ages, the Supreme Court of Korea after democratization is famous for highly efficient daily judicial system than most of other developed countries. For example, South Korean ordinary judiciary ranked at top-tier for both rapidness of trial length and cost efficiency at comparative research of OECD in year 2015.

Composition

Justices

Since the current Constitution of South Korea doesn't specify the exact number of Supreme Court justices ( ko, 대법관), the number of justices is stipulated by the statute called the Court Organization Act ( ko, 법원조직법) on the organization of ordinary courts. Currently in 2022, the number of justices is 14 by article 4(2) of the Act. All of the Supreme Court justices are appointed by the President of South Korea with the consent of the National Assembly, according to article 104(2) of the Constitution. It is notable that article 104(2) of the Constitution also empowers the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to recommend candidates for Supreme Court justice. To be appointed as Supreme Court justice, one should be at least 45 years old, qualified as an attorney at law, and also should have more than 20 years of experience in legal practice or academia, by article 42(1) of the Act.

Council of Supreme Court Justices

Article 104(2) of the Constitution requires consent of 'Council of Supreme Court Justices' ( ko, 대법관회의) for appointment of lower ordinary courts Judges ( ko, 판사) by Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. The council is composed of all Supreme Court Justices (including the Chief Justice), and can make decision by simple majority among quorum of two-thirds of all Supreme Court Justices, according to article 16(1), (2) and (3) of the Court Organization Act. When the vote ties, the Chief Justice has casting vote as permanent presiding chair at the council. Also empowered by article 17 of the Act, the council has also other supervisory functions for the Chief Justice's power of court administration, such as promulgation of interior procedural rules, selection of judicial precedents for publication and fiscal planning for all ordinary courts including the Supreme Court itself.

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

By article 104(1) of the Constitution, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is appointed by the President of South Korea with the consent of the National Assembly. The experience and age requirements for the Chief Justice are the same as that of the associate Supreme Court justices under article 42(1) of the Court Organization Act.

The Chief Justice's role is more than being the presiding member of the Grand Bench ( ko, 전원합의체), composed of more than two-thirds of all fourteen justices. The Chief nominates candidates for three of the nine Constitutional Court justices under article 111(3) of Constitution and serves as chair at the Council of Supreme Court Justices. Also, the Chief appoints one of the associate Supreme Court justices as Minister of National Court Administration ( ko, 법원행정처) and appoints all ordinary lower court judges with the consent of the Council of Supreme Court Justices.

Tenure

Article 105(1), (2) and (4) of the Constitution and article 45(4) of the Court Organization Act provides the term of associate Justices as renewable six-year up to mandatory retirement age of 70. However, there's no Justices who attempted to renew their term by reappointment in current Sixth Republic, because renewing attempt can harm judicial independence of the Court. During the term, according to article 106(2) of the Constitution, Justices shall not be expelled from office unless by impeachment or a sentence of imprisonment. Also, participating in any political party or activities are prohibited by article 43(1), 49 of the Act.

A noteworthy point of South Korean Supreme Court Justices is they can be retired from office against their will while in term, when they are regarded as having unbearable mental or physical impairment. This 'order' of retirement by President of South Korea due to impairment of Supreme Court Justice ( ko, 심신장해로 인한 퇴직명령) is clearly stipulated in article 106(2) of the Constitution and article 47 of the Act. Other lower ordinary court Judges can also be ordered to retire due to impairment by Supreme Court Chief Justice. This is retirement order system is one of major difference between Supreme Court Justice and Constitutional Court Justice; the latter cannot be ordered to retire because of impairment, as there are no statute supporting such retirement order system in the Constitutional Court Act.

Current justices

Organization

Research judges

Judges in Research division of the Supreme Court ( ko, 재판연구관, formerly known as 'Research Judges' or 'Judicial Researchers') are officials supporting Supreme Court Justices. By article 24(3) of the Act, there are two types of Research Judges; One is originally lower ordinary court Judges seconded to the Supreme Court by order of Chief Justice, another is experts who are not lower ordinary court Judges. The latter is called 'Judicial Researchers' and appointed for maximum term of 3 years, while former is called 'Research Judges' and usually seconded to work in the Supreme Court for 1 to 2 years. This system is influenced by German 'Research Associates' (''german: Wissenschaftlichen Mitarbeiter'') who are originally lower court judges seconded to federal courts up to five years, working as judicial assistant for judges in highest courts. Though working term for these research staffs are short, they are core staffs who operates whole procedure of the Court, since there are too many of cases appealed to the Court. The number of Research Judges are currently around 100, while number of Judicial Researchers are around 30.

National Court Administration

Established as apparatus of the Supreme Court under article 67 of the Court Organization Act, the 'National Court Administration' (NCA, ko, 법원행정처) manages all of matters on administration of all ordinary courts (including the Supreme Court itself) in South Korea. The head of the NCA is called 'Minister of NCA' ( ko, 법원행정처장) and solely appointed by the Chief Justice among associate Supreme Court Justices. As other Supreme Court Justices, the Minister is treated as same level as other Ministers at State Council in executive branch of South Korean government. Also the Vice Minister of NCA is appointed by the Chief Justice usually from senior lower court Judges and treated as same level as other Vice-Ministers. The NCA follows direction of the Chief Justice and implements decisions from the Council of Supreme Court Justices. Its main role includes assisting the Chief Justice's power on human resource issues of lower ordinary court Judges, planning fiscal budget and expenditure issues for all ordinary courts, and internal inspection for anti-corruption ethics.

Judicial Research and Training Institute

The 'Judicial Research and Training Institute' (JRTI, ko, 사법연수원) is currently an institution for training and reeducating lower ordinary court Judges by article 72 of the Court Organization Act. However, it was originally a kind of nation-wide 2-year law school supported by South Korean government before South Korea adopted American styled 3-year law school system in year 2008. Before South Korea adopted American law school system ( ko, 법학전문대학원), South Korea trained its legal professionals mainly by JRTI. Another route was recruitment by South Korean Armed Forces as 'Judge Advocates' ( ko, 군법무관).

The JRTI was basically a South Korean conversion of ' Legal Research and Training Institute' ( ja, 司法研修所) in Japan, which was an institution for training judges, prosecutors and attorneys-at-laws at the same time. The trainees at JRTI was selected by a nation-wide exam on jurisprudence called 'Judicial exam' ( ko, 사법시험). These trainees were commonly trained and competed against each other in the JRTI for 2 years, as their career option after graduation was restricted according to graduation records of JRTI. Graduated trainee with superior records usually choose to become Judges and Prosecutors, while trainees with lower records had to choose working as lawyers in fields. This partially continued civil law tradition of regarding prosecutors as de facto part of judiciary, like French National School for the Judiciary, is reflected in organization of JRTI, as the deputy director (or vice-president) of the JRTI is appointed among Prosecutors by article 74(1) of the Act. Yet after American styled 3-year law school system was adopted in South Korea, the JRTI lost its status as only professional school for law in South Korea, and turned into internal education institute for newly appointed Judges and Law clerks. Some of senior Judges are also retrained in JRTI for technical matters. Also, currently all of training functions for Prosecutors are transferred to 'Institute of Justice' ( ko, 법무연수원) at Ministry of Justice.

Judicial Policy Research Institute

Established by article 76-2 of the Court Organization Act in year 2014, the 'Judicial Policy Research Institute' (JPRI, ko, 사법정책연구원) is apparatus of the Supreme Court for research on policy issues concerning judicial system of South Korea. It also has function for educating public on elementary issues on function of ordinary courts. Research fellows and Researchers at the Institute are recruited mainly from lower ordinary courts Judges, yet significant number of Researchers are recruited from outside of ordinary courts usually with PhD degrees, by article 76-4 of the Act. The JPRI is currently located in Goyang, Gyeonggi.

Building

The Supreme Court was located in Seosomun-dong of Jung-gu, Seoul until year 1995. Currently, it is located in Seocho, Seoul. The Supreme Court building in Seocho has 16 floors and two underground floors with total space aroung 66,500 square meters. This large size building was necessary to hold the Supreme Court, National Court Administration and law library all together. Main Center of the building is mainly used by the Supreme Court, while east Wing is maily used by National Court Administration. Other Wing is used by law library. At the center entrance of the building, three Korean words are engraved; '' ko, 자유'' meaning freedom, '' ko, 평등'' meaning equality, and '' ko, 정의'' meaning Justice. The Supreme Court usually does not hold open hearing session, though sessions for verdicts are regularly held on the second and last Thursday of a month.

Jurisdiction

Empowered by article 101(2) and 110(2) of the Constitution, the Supreme Court has comprehensive final appellate jurisdiction over all ordinary courts and military courts cases. It can also exercise power of judicial review on sub-statutory level as other ordinary courts according to article 107(2) of the Constitution. It is notable that some of cases are handled only in the Supreme Court as single-tiered trial without possibility of appeal. This kind of single-tiered trial cases include dispute on election of President of South Korea, National Assembly members, and Provincial-level local governors and local parliament members according to article 222 and 223 of the Public Official Election Act. Another example of single-tiered trial case at the Supreme Court is case on discipline of Judge's misconduct, under article 27(2) of the Discipline Of Judges Act.

Procedure

By article 7(1) of the Court Organization Act, the Supreme Court handles final appellate cases in two different phases. One is 'Petty Bench' which is a small panel inside the Court presided by most senior Justice inside the Petty Bench, and the other is 'Grand Bench' which is an ''en banc'' of the Court which is always presided by the Chief Justice.

Petty Bench and Grand Bench

In the first phase, the 'Petty Bench' ( ko, 소부) composed of four Supreme Court Justices reviews how appeal should be handled. If the four Justices in the same Petty Bench makes decision unanimously, the case is decided in the Petty Bench. However, when the Petty Bench cannot make unanimous decision by itself, or when the Petty Bench decides such case should be handled in en banc (for example, if it is necessary to change precedent of the Supreme Court, or if constitutional review at sub-statutory level is important issue of the case, etc.), the Grand Bench takes the case. Since there is three petty benches in the Court, only twelve out of fourteen Supreme Court Justices are participating in the first phase of the procedure. Other two Supreme Court Justices who are not belonged to any Petty Bench, are the Chief Justice and the Minister of National Court Administration, both having administrative role inside the Court. In the second phase, the 'Grand Bench' ( ko, 전원합의체) composed of more than two-thirds of all Supreme Court Justices reviews the case came up from the Petty Bench. It makes decision by simple majority. However, if there's no majority opinion in the Bench, opinion of the Court is decided according to article 66 of the Act.

Presiding Justice and Justice in charge

In South Korea, among panel of Judges or Justices, there should be 'presiding member ( ko, 재판장)' and 'member in charge ( ko, 주심)'. The presiding member is official representative of the panel. The member in charge is who oversees hearing and trial and writes draft judgment for each specific case. This role of 'member in charge' is mostly similar to Judge-Rapporteur in European Court of Justice. Usually the member in charge is automatically (or randomly) selected by computer to negate suspicion of partiality. However, the presiding member is bureaucratically selected by seniority. Due to this virtual difference in role, 'presiding Judge' in South Korean courts usually refer to'' ko, 부장판사'' which means such Judge is bureaucratically regarded as 'head of the panel', not who really takes role of presiding member in each of specific cases.

Case naming

Current cases in the Supreme Court are named as following rule. First two or four digit Arabic numbers indicate the year when the case is filed. And the following case code composed of Alphabets matches with specific jurisdiction (for example, 'Da' is for private law cases, while 'Du' is for criminal law cases) of the Court. The last serial number is given in the order of case filing of each year.

Statistics

Approximately, the Supreme Court receives about 35,000 ~ 48,000 appeal cases per year from year 2011 to 2020. Yet South Korean Supreme Court has no legal power to select reviewable case by discretion, so it cannot make 'permission to appeal' ( ko, 상고허가). Rather, every cases appealed to the Supreme Court should be decided at least in level of Petty Bench composed of four Supreme Court Justices. This unique institutional structure increases workload of the Supreme Court seriously. For example, while the Supreme Court makes decision on about 35,000 ~ 50,000 cases per year, only 10 ~ 20 cases are decided at the Grand Bench per year. Even former Supreme Court Justice Park Sihwan confessed in his own article after retirement, that much of cases in the Petty Bench are deliberated for only '3 to 4 minutes', which makes role of Research Judges in the Court significantly important.

Whether how to reform this system is still remained in South Korea as controversy among increasing number of Justices, empowering the Court with discretion of 'permission to appeal', or establishing another 'appellate court' ( ko, 상고법원) which only deals with second-rate important final appeal cases abandoned from the Supreme Court. This was one of the reason that former Chief Justice Yang Sung-tae tried to interfere in lower court judgments to get endorsement on foundation of 'appellate court' from former President of South Korea, Park Geun-hye, as Yang opposed to increasing number of Supreme Court Justices as since it can harm previlieges of Justices.

Criticism and Issues

* The Supreme Court's fame and trust is again gradually deteriorating again in contemporary South Korea, due to social concerns on unfairly lenient attitude toward establishments like Chaebol and embarrassing political struggle inside the hierarchy of ordinary courts such as case-rigging scandal of 15th Chief Justice Yang Sung-tae.
* Both Constitution and the Court Organization Act have no contingency plan for massive vacancy of the Supreme Court. Thus, when the National Assembly refuses to make consent on appointment of Supreme Court Justices by article 104(1) and (2) of the Constitution, there is no other option and the Supreme Court is paralyzed by vacancy of Justices. While this problem is also happening in the Constitutional Court of Korea, the problem of the Supreme Court is lighter than that of Constitutional Court, because the Supreme Court only requires simple majority for any decision by article 66(1) of the Act. Yet the Constitutional Court should have more at least six Justices to make upholding decision by article 113(1) of the Constitution.

See also

* Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Korea
* Politics of South Korea
* Government of South Korea
* Judiciary of South Korea
* Constitutional Court of Korea

References

External links

the Supreme Court of Korea Official Website

The Constitution of the Republic of Korea (translated in English), Korea Legislation Research Institute

Court Organization Act (translated in English), Korea Legislation Research Institute

2019 Introductory Book of the Supreme Court of Korea, published and downloadable by the Supreme Court of Korea

{{Authority control

Judiciary of South Korea
Korea, South
Courts in South Korea
Law of South Korea
1948 establishments in South Korea
Courts and tribunals established in 1948
Seocho District