HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The ''Jobs and Growth Act, 2012'' (informally referred to as Bill C-45) (the ''Act'') is an Act of the
Parliament of Canada The Parliament of Canada (french: Parlement du Canada) is the federal legislature of Canada, seated at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, and is composed of three parts: the King, the Senate, and the House of Commons. By constitutional convention, ...
. It was passed in December 2012 from the second
omnibus bill An omnibus bill is a proposed law that covers a number of diverse or unrelated topics. ''Omnibus'' is derived from Latin and means "to, for, by, with or from everything". An omnibus bill is a single document that is accepted in a single vote by a ...
introduced by the Conservative government to implement its 2012 budget, following the passage of the ''
Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act The ''Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act'' (informally referred to as Bill C-38) is an Act of the Parliament of Canada. This omnibus bill was introduced by Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance under Prime Minister Steven Harper's majorit ...
'' in June 2012. Both bills attracted controversy both for their size (>450 pages each) and for the breadth of provisions contained that were not fiscally related.


Content of the ''Act''


Reaction to ''Navigable Waters Protection Act'' changes

"The most contentious amendments to the bill were those to the ''
Navigable Waters Protection Act The ''Canadian Navigable Waters Act'' (the ''Act'') (formerly the ''Navigation Protection Act'' and beforehand the ''Navigable Waters Protection Act'') is one of the oldest regulatory statutes enacted by the Parliament of Canada. It requires appro ...
'', which remove thousands of lakes and streams from federal protection under that law. The Conservatives said the changes streamline regulation and remove red tape that held up projects along waterways under the guise that they would impede navigation. Opposition parties say it removes environmental oversight over some of Canada's most treasured lakes and rivers." The Green Party argued that Division 18 of Part 4 of Bill C-45 "weakened Canadians’ historic right to navigate the lakes, rivers, and streams of Canada without being impeded by pipelines, bridges, power lines, dams, mining and forestry equipment, and more." They argue that a body of water not mentioned in Schedule 2 on page 424, would no longer be protected from resource development by Canada's first environmental law enacted in 1882, the
Navigable Waters Protection Act The ''Canadian Navigable Waters Act'' (the ''Act'') (formerly the ''Navigation Protection Act'' and beforehand the ''Navigable Waters Protection Act'') is one of the oldest regulatory statutes enacted by the Parliament of Canada. It requires appro ...
.
Amnesty International Amnesty International (also referred to as Amnesty or AI) is an international non-governmental organization focused on human rights, with its headquarters in the United Kingdom. The organization says it has more than ten million members and s ...
said "changes to the ''
Canadian Environmental Assessment Act The ''Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012'' (CEAA 2012) (the ''Act'') and its regulations established the legislative basis for the federal practice of environmental assessment in most regions of Canada from 2012 to 2019. It was repealed w ...
'', the '' Fisheries Act'', the ''
Navigable Waters Protection Act The ''Canadian Navigable Waters Act'' (the ''Act'') (formerly the ''Navigation Protection Act'' and beforehand the ''Navigable Waters Protection Act'') is one of the oldest regulatory statutes enacted by the Parliament of Canada. It requires appro ...
'', and the proposed ''
Safe Drinking Water for First Nations Act A safe (also called a strongbox or coffer) is a secure lockable box used for securing valuable objects against theft or fire. A safe is usually a hollow cuboid or cylinder, with one face being removable or hinged to form a door. The body and d ...
'' have profound implications for the rights of Indigenous peoples as set out in treaties, affirmed in the constitution, and protected by international human rights standards."


Reaction to ''Indian Act'' changes

Former Prime Minister
Paul Martin Paul Edgar Philippe Martin (born August 28, 1938), also known as Paul Martin Jr., is a Canadian lawyer and politician who served as the 21st prime minister of Canada and the leader of the Liberal Party of Canada from 2003 to 2006. The son ...
argued that the government failed to consult First Nations about this movement towards rivatizationand that the majority of bands were against the change to voting procedures. Martin stated that there was no debate either in parliament or with First Nations on this issue that "the bands themselves must decide." He denounced the way in which it was "simply slipped it into a budget bill."
Idle No More Idle No More is an ongoing protest movement, founded in December 2012 by four women: three First Nations women and one non-Native ally. It is a grassroots movement among the Indigenous peoples in Canada comprising the First Nations, Métis ...
is a protest movement formed in reaction to Bill C-45 (Division 8 of Part 4) and other concerns regarding Indigenous
treaty rights In Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the United States the term treaty rights specifically refers to rights for indigenous peoples enumerated in treaties with settler societies that arose from European colonization. Exactly who is indigenou ...
. Political scientist Tom Flanagan, who worked as advisor to
Stephen Harper Stephen Joseph Harper (born April 30, 1959) is a Canadian politician who served as the 22nd prime minister of Canada from 2006 to 2015. Harper is the first and only prime minister to come from the modern-day Conservative Party of Canada, ...
until 2004, argued that the modifications to voting and approval procedures in relation to proposed land designations in the ''
Indian Act The ''Indian Act'' (, long name ''An Act to amend and consolidate the laws respecting Indians'') is a Canadian act of Parliament that concerns registered Indians, their bands, and the system of Indian reserves. First passed in 1876 and still ...
'' in (Division 8 of Part 4) would speed up approvals which would be advantageous to First Nations that want to lease portions of their reserves for shopping centres, industrial parks, residential developments, casinos, etc. Under the ''Indian Act'' changes to land designation for leasing "had to be approved by majority vote in a referendum or band meeting for which the quorum was a majority of members – in other words, approval by a majority of a majority. If, as usually happened, the quorum was not achieved, the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs could authorize a second meeting dispensing with the quorum." Flanagan argued that this two-stage process was both costly and time consuming.


External links

* * *


References

{{reflist, 30em 41st Canadian Parliament Indigenous politics in Canada Canadian federal legislation Idle No More 2012 in Canadian law Omnibus legislation