HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Johnson v Unisys Limited'' UKHL_13
is_a_leading_UK_labour_law.html" ;"title="001
UKHL 13
is a leading UK labour law">001
UKHL 13
is a leading UK labour law case on the measure of damages for unfair dismissal and the nature of the contract of employment.


Facts

After twenty years of working for Unisys Ltd in Milton Keynes, in 1994 Mr Johnson was dismissed for an alleged irregularity in his work. He suffered a mental breakdown, drank heavily, was admitted to mental hospital, could not find a new job despite over 100 applications and at age 52 was unlikely to have a promising future career. He claimed that he was wrongly dismissed, and that the manner of his dismissal, which was summarily without the chance of a fair hearing and with one month's pay in lieu only, caused his health problems. He sought compensation for unfair dismissal, and in addition for the manner of dismissal given the employer's breach of
mutual trust and confidence Mutual trust and confidence is a phrase used in English law, particularly with reference to contracts in UK labour law, to refer to the obligations owed in an employment relationship between the employer and the worker. This concept relates to a n ...
.


Judgment

The House of Lords held that while Mr Johnson had been dismissed unfairly there could be no compensation for the manner of Mr Johnson's dismissal if that would exceed the statutory scheme laid out in the
Employment Rights Act 1996 The Employment Rights Act 1996 (c. 18) is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament passed by the Conservative government to codify existing law on individual rights in UK labour law. History Previous statutes, dating from the Contracts of Employment ...
and the accompanying limits on compensation that could be sought through the system of employment tribunals. While a common law right to full compensation for breach of contract might exist, it could not circumvent the intention of Parliament in laying down limits to compensation for dismissals. Lord Nicholls said the following. Lord Steyn, dissenting, argued the statutory remedies in salary for wrongful dismissal inadequate, and the statutory term of notice did not prevent developing an implied term of good faith and fair dealing. There was no conflict between the requirement of notice and not to exercise the power in a harsh, humiliating manner.
Lord Hoffmann Leonard Hubert "Lennie" Hoffmann, Baron Hoffmann (born 8 May 1934) is a retired senior South African–British judge. He served as a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary from 1995 to 2009. Well known for his lively decisions and willingness to break ...
made some important remarks on the contract of employment. UKHL_13
_[35.html" ;"title="001
UKHL 13
[35">001
UKHL 13
[35/ref>


See also

*UK labour law


Notes

{{reflist, 2


References

*E McGaughey, ''A Casebook on Labour Law'' (Hart 2019) ch 3, 96 English contract case law 2001 in United Kingdom case law House of Lords cases Unisys United Kingdom labour case law United Kingdom employment contract case law