Inverse Category

In group theory, an inverse semigroup (occasionally called an inversion semigroup) ''S'' is a semigroup in which every element ''x'' in ''S'' has a unique ''inverse'' ''y'' in ''S'' in the sense that ''x = xyx'' and ''y = yxy'', i.e. a regular semigroup in which every element has a unique inverse. Inverse semigroups appear in a range of contexts; for example, they can be employed in the study of partial symmetries.

(The convention followed in this article will be that of writing a function on the right of its argument, e.g. ''x f'' rather than ''f(x)'', and
composing functions from left to right—a convention often observed in semigroup theory.)

Origins

Inverse semigroups were introduced independently by Viktor Vladimirovich Wagner in the Soviet Union in 1952, and by Gordon Preston in the United Kingdom in 1954. Both authors arrived at inverse semigroups via the study of partial bijections of a set: a partial transformation ''α'' of a set ''X'' is a function from ''A'' to
''B'', where ''A'' and ''B'' are subsets of ''X''. Let ''α'' and ''β'' be partial transformations of a set ''X''; ''α'' and ''β'' can be composed (from left to right) on the largest domain upon which it "makes sense" to compose them:

: \operatorname\alpha\beta = operatorname \alpha \cap \operatorname \beta\alpha^ \,

where ''α''⁻¹ denotes the preimage under ''α''. Partial transformations had already been studied in the context of pseudogroups. It was Wagner, however, who
was the first to observe that the composition of partial transformations is a special case of the composition of binary relations. He recognised also that the domain of composition of two partial transformations may be the empty set, so he introduced an ''empty transformation'' to take account of this. With the addition of this empty transformation, the composition of partial transformations of a set becomes an everywhere-defined associative binary operation. Under this composition, the collection $\mathcal_X$ of all partial one-one transformations of a set ''X'' forms an inverse semigroup, called the ''symmetric inverse semigroup'' (or monoid) on ''X'', with inverse the functional inverse defined from image to domain (equivalently, the converse relation). This is the "archetypal" inverse semigroup, in the same way that a symmetric group is the archetypal group. For example, just as every group can be embedded in a symmetric group, every inverse semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup (see below).

The basics

The inverse of an element ''x'' of an inverse semigroup ''S'' is usually written ''x''⁻¹. Inverses in an
inverse semigroup have many of the same properties as inverses in a group, for example,
(''ab'')⁻¹ = ''b''⁻¹''a''⁻¹. In an inverse monoid, ''xx''⁻¹ and
''x''⁻¹''x'' are not necessarily equal to the identity, but they are both idempotent. An inverse monoid ''S'' in which ''xx''⁻¹ = 1 =
''x''⁻¹''x'', for all ''x'' in ''S'' (a ''unipotent'' inverse monoid), is, of course, a group.

There are a number of equivalent characterisations of an inverse semigroup ''S'':
* Every element of ''S'' has a unique inverse, in the above sense.
* Every element of ''S'' has at least one inverse (''S'' is a regular semigroup) and idempotents commute (that is, the idempotents of ''S'' form a semilattice).
* Every $\mathcal$-class and every $\mathcal$-class contains precisely one idempotent, where $\mathcal$ and $\mathcal$ are two of Green's relations.
The idempotent in the $\mathcal$-class of ''s'' is ''s''⁻¹''s'', whilst the
idempotent in the $\mathcal$-class of ''s'' is ''ss''⁻¹. There is therefore a simple
characterisation of Green's relations in an inverse semigroup:
:$a\,\mathcal\,b\Longleftrightarrow a^a=b^b,\quad a\,\mathcal\,b\Longleftrightarrow aa^=bb^$

Unless stated otherwise, ''E(S)'' will denote the semilattice of idempotents of an inverse semigroup ''S''.

Examples of inverse semigroups

* Partial bijections on a set ''X'' form an inverse semigroup under composition.
* Every group is an inverse semigroup.
* The bicyclic semigroup is inverse, with (''a'',''b'')⁻¹ = (''b'',''a'').
* Every semilattice is inverse.
* The Brandt semigroup is inverse.
* The Munn semigroup is inverse.

Multiplication table example. It is associative and every element has its own inverse according to aba = a, bab = b. It has no identity and is not commutative.

The natural partial order

An inverse semigroup ''S'' possesses a ''natural partial order'' relation ≤ (sometimes denoted by ω),
which is defined by the following:
:$a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=eb,$
for some idempotent ''e'' in ''S''. Equivalently,
:$a \leq b \Longleftrightarrow a=bf,$
for some (in general, different) idempotent ''f'' in ''S''. In fact, ''e'' can be taken to be
''aa''⁻¹ and ''f'' to be ''a''⁻¹''a''.

The natural partial order is compatible with both multiplication and inversion, that is,
:$a \leq b, c \leq d \Longrightarrow ac \leq bd$
and
:$a \leq b \Longrightarrow a^ \leq b^.$

In a group, this partial order simply reduces to equality, since the identity is the
only idempotent. In a symmetric inverse semigroup, the partial order reduces to restriction of mappings,
i.e., α ≤ β if, and only if, the domain of α is contained in the domain of β and
''x''α = ''x''β, for all ''x'' in the domain of α.

The natural partial order on an inverse semigroup interacts with Green's relations as follows: if ''s'' ≤
''t'' and ''s''$\,\mathcal\,$''t'', then ''s'' = ''t''. Similarly, if
''s''$\,\mathcal\,$''t''.

On ''E(S)'', the natural partial order becomes:
:$e \leq f \Longleftrightarrow e = ef,$

so, since the idempotents form a semilattice under the product operation, products on ''E(S)'' give least upper bounds with respect to
≤.

If ''E(S)'' is finite and forms a chain (i.e., ''E(S)'' is totally ordered by ≤), then
''S'' is a union of groups. If ''E(S)'' is an infinite chain it is possible to obtain an analogous result under additional hypotheses on ''S'' and ''E(S).''

Homomorphisms and representations of inverse semigroups

A homomorphism (or ''morphism'') of inverse semigroups is defined in exactly the same way as for any other
semigroup: for inverse semigroups ''S'' and ''T'', a function ''θ'' from ''S'' to ''T''
is a morphism if (''sθ'')(''tθ'') = (''st'')''θ'', for all ''s'',''t'' in ''S''. The definition of a
morphism of inverse semigroups could be augmented by including the condition (''sθ'')⁻¹ =
''s''⁻¹''θ'', however, there is no need to do so, since this property follows from the above
definition, via the following theorem:

Theorem. The homomorphic image of an inverse semigroup is an inverse semigroup; the
inverse of an element is always mapped to the inverse of the image of that
element.

One of the earliest results proved about inverse semigroups was the ''Wagner–Preston Theorem'', which is an analogue
of Cayley's Theorem for groups:

Wagner–Preston Theorem. If ''S'' is an inverse semigroup, then the function φ
from ''S'' to $\mathcal_S$, given by
:dom (''a''φ) = ''Sa''⁻¹ and ''x''(''a''φ) = ''xa''
is a faithful representation of ''S''.

Thus, any inverse semigroup can be embedded in a symmetric inverse semigroup, and with image closed under the inverse operation on partial bijections. Conversely, any subsemigroup of the symmetric inverse semigroup closed under the inverse operation is an inverse semigroup. Hence a semigroup ''S'' is isomorphic to a subsemigroup of the symmetric inverse semigroup closed under inverses if and only if ''S'' is an inverse semigroup.

Congruences on inverse semigroups

Congruences are defined on inverse semigroups in exactly the same way as for any other semigroup: a
''congruence'' ''ρ'' is an equivalence relation that is compatible with semigroup multiplication, i.e.,
:$a\,\rho\,b,\quad c\,\rho\,d\Longrightarrow ac\,\rho\,bd.$

Of particular interest is the relation $\sigma$, defined on an inverse semigroup ''S'' by
:$a\,\sigma\,b\Longleftrightarrow$ there exists a $c\in S$ with $c\leq a,b.$
It can be shown that ''σ'' is a congruence and, in fact, it is a group congruence, meaning that the factor semigroup ''S''/''σ'' is a group. In the set of all group congruences on a semigroup ''S'', the minimal element (for the partial order defined by inclusion of sets) need not be the smallest element. In the specific case in which ''S'' is an inverse semigroup ''σ'' is the ''smallest'' congruence on ''S'' such that ''S''/''σ'' is a group, that is, if ''τ'' is any
other congruence on ''S'' with ''S''/''τ'' a group, then ''σ'' is contained in ''τ''. The congruence ''σ'' is
called the ''minimum group congruence'' on ''S''. The minimum group
congruence can be used to give a characterisation of ''E''-unitary inverse semigroups (see below).

A congruence ''ρ'' on an inverse semigroup ''S'' is called ''idempotent pure'' if
:$a\in S, e\in E(S), a\,\rho\,e\Longrightarrow a\in E(S).$

''E''-unitary inverse semigroups

One class of inverse semigroups that has been studied extensively over the years is the class of ''E''-unitary
inverse semigroups: an inverse semigroup ''S'' (with semilattice ''E'' of idempotents) is
''E''-''unitary'' if, for all ''e'' in ''E'' and all ''s'' in ''S'',
:$es \in E \Longrightarrow s \in E.$
Equivalently,
:$se \in E \Rightarrow s \in E.$

One further characterisation of an ''E''-unitary inverse semigroup ''S'' is the following: if ''e'' is in ''E'' and
''e'' ≤ ''s'', for some ''s'' in ''S'', then ''s'' is in ''E''.

Theorem. Let ''S'' be an inverse semigroup with semilattice ''E'' of idempotents, and minimum group
congruence ''σ''. Then the following are equivalent:
*''S'' is ''E''-unitary;
*''σ'' is idempotent pure;
*$\sim$ = ''σ'',
where $\sim$ is the ''compatibility relation'' on ''S'', defined by
:$a\sim b\Longleftrightarrow ab^,a^b$ are idempotent.

McAlister's Covering Theorem. Every inverse semigroup S has a E-unitary cover; that is there exists an idempotent separating surjective homomorphism from some E-unitary semigroup T onto S.

Central to the study of ''E''-unitary inverse semigroups is the following construction. Let $\mathcal$ be a partially ordered set, with ordering ≤, and let $\mathcal$ be a subset of $\mathcal$ with the properties that
*$\mathcal$ is a lower semilattice, that is, every pair of elements ''A'', ''B'' in $\mathcal$ has a greatest lower bound ''A'' $\wedge$ ''B'' in $\mathcal$ (with respect to ≤);
*$\mathcal$ is an order ideal of $\mathcal$, that is, for ''A'', ''B'' in $\mathcal$, if ''A'' is in $\mathcal$ and ''B'' ≤ ''A'', then ''B'' is in $\mathcal$.

Now let ''G'' be a group that acts on $\mathcal$ (on the left), such that
*for all ''g'' in ''G'' and all ''A'', ''B'' in $\mathcal$, ''gA'' = ''gB'' if, and only if, ''A'' = ''B'';
*for each ''g'' in ''G'' and each ''B'' in $\mathcal$, there exists an ''A'' in $\mathcal$ such that ''gA'' = ''B'';
*for all ''A'', ''B'' in $\mathcal$, ''A'' ≤ ''B'' if, and only if, ''gA'' ≤ ''gB'';
*for all ''g'', ''h'' in ''G'' and all ''A'' in $\mathcal$, ''g''(''hA'') = (''gh'')''A''.

The triple $(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ is also assumed to have the following properties:
*for every ''X'' in $\mathcal$, there exists a ''g'' in ''G'' and an ''A'' in $\mathcal$ such that ''gA'' = ''X'';
*for all ''g'' in ''G'', ''g''$\mathcal$ and $\mathcal$ have nonempty intersection.

Such a triple $(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ is called a ''McAlister triple''. A McAlister triple is
used to define the following:
:$P(G, \mathcal, \mathcal) = \$
together with multiplication
:$(A,g)(B,h)=(A \wedge gB, gh)$.
Then $P(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ is an inverse semigroup under this multiplication, with
(''A'',''g'')⁻¹ = (''g''⁻¹''A'', ''g''⁻¹). One of the main results in the study of
''E''-unitary inverse semigroups is ''McAlister's P-Theorem'':

McAlister's P-Theorem. Let $(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ be a McAlister triple. Then $P(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ is an ''E''-unitary inverse semigroup. Conversely, every ''E''-unitary inverse
semigroup is isomorphic to one of this type.

''F''-inverse semigroups

An inverse semigroup is said to be ''F''-inverse if every element has a ''unique'' maximal element above it in the natural partial order, i.e. every ''σ''-class has a maximal element. Every ''F''-inverse semigroup is an ''E''-unitary monoid. McAlister's covering theorem has been refined by M.V. Lawson to:

Theorem. Every inverse semigroup has an ''F''-inverse cover.

McAlister's ''P''-theorem has been used to characterize ''F''-inverse semigroups as well. A McAlister triple $(G, \mathcal, \mathcal)$ is an ''F''-inverse semigroup if and only if $\mathcal$ is a principal ideal of $\mathcal$ and $\mathcal$ is a semilattice.

Free inverse semigroups

A construction similar to a free group is possible for inverse semigroups. A presentation of the free inverse semigroup on a set ''X'' may be obtained by considering the free semigroup with involution, where involution is the taking of the inverse, and then taking the quotient by the Vagner congruence

:$\.$

The word problem for free inverse semigroups is much more intricate than that of free groups. A celebrated result in this area due to W. D. Munn who showed that elements of the free inverse semigroup can be naturally regarded as trees, known as Munn trees. Multiplication in the free inverse semigroup has a correspondent on Munn trees, which essentially consists of overlapping common portions of the trees. (see Lawson 1998 for further details)

Any free inverse semigroup is ''F''-inverse.

Connections with category theory

The above composition of partial transformations of a set gives rise to a symmetric inverse semigroup. There is another way of composing partial transformations, which is more restrictive than that used above: two partial transformations ''α'' and ''β'' are composed if, and only if, the image of α is equal to the domain of ''β''; otherwise, the composition αβ is undefined. Under this alternative composition, the collection
of all partial one-one transformations of a set forms not an inverse semigroup but an inductive groupoid, in the sense of category theory. This close connection between inverse semigroups and inductive groupoids is embodied in the ''Ehresmann–Schein–Nambooripad Theorem'', which states that an inductive groupoid can always be
constructed from an inverse semigroup, and conversely. More precisely, an inverse semigroup is precisely a groupoid in the category of posets that is an étale groupoid with respect to its (dual) Alexandrov topology and whose poset of objects is a meet-semilattice.

Generalisations of inverse semigroups

As noted above, an inverse semigroup ''S'' can be defined by the conditions (1) ''S'' is a regular semigroup,
and (2) the idempotents in ''S'' commute; this has led to two distinct classes of generalisations of
an inverse semigroup: semigroups in which (1) holds, but (2) does not, and vice versa.

Examples of regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:
*'' Regular semigroups'': a semigroup ''S'' is ''regular'' if every element has at least one inverse; equivalently, for each ''a'' in ''S'', there is an ''x'' in ''S'' such that ''axa'' = ''a''.
*''Locally inverse semigroups'': a regular semigroup ''S'' is ''locally inverse'' if ''eSe'' is an inverse semigroup, for each idempotent ''e''.
*''Orthodox semigroups'': a regular semigroup ''S'' is ''orthodox'' if its subset of idempotents forms a subsemigroup.
*''Generalised inverse semigroups'': a regular semigroup ''S'' is called a ''generalised inverse semigroup'' if its idempotents form a normal band, i.e., ''xyzx'' = ''xzyx'', for all idempotents ''x'', ''y'', ''z''.

The class of generalised inverse semigroups is the intersection of the class of
locally inverse semigroups and the class of orthodox semigroups.

Amongst the non-regular generalisations of an inverse semigroup are:,
*(Left, right, two-sided) adequate semigroups.
*(Left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups.
*(Left, right, two-sided) semiadequate semigroups.
*Weakly (left, right, two-sided) ample semigroups.

Inverse category

This notion of inverse also readily generalizes to categories. An inverse category is simply a category in which every morphism has a generalized inverse such that and . An inverse category is selfdual. The category of sets and partial bijections is the prime example.

Inverse categories have found various applications in theoretical computer science.

See also

Notes

References

*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
English translation
PDF)
*

Further reading

*For a brief introduction to inverse semigroups, see either or .
*More comprehensive introductions can be found in and .
*{{Cite journal , doi = 10.1017/S0013091512000211, title = On inverse categories and transfer in cohomology, journal = Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, volume = 56, pages = 187, year = 2012, last1 = Linckelmann , first1 = M. , url = http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/7351/1/invcat.pdf}
Open access preprint

Algebraic structures
Semigroup theory