Taxonomy
In 1895, C. H Meriam described 3 genera of pocket gophers: ''Heterogeomys'', ''Macrogeomys'', and '' Orthogeomys''. In the 1968 taxonomic revision, R. J. Russell recognized ''Heterogeomys'' and ''Macrogeomys'' as subgenera of ''Orthogeomys''. However, recent studies suggests that ' may beSpecies
This genus contains the following seven species: *Morphology
Pocket Gophers range in size from about 170 mm (for example, ''H. cherriei'' and ''H. underwoodi'') to around 280 mm (such as ''H. heterodus'' and ''H. cavator''). Tails can range in length from 80 to 160 mm depending on the species. Sources have reported that a key factor in determining the size of the animal is the soil composition in the animal's native habitat. Looser, sandy soil types are associated with increased cranial size, while more densely packed soil seems to correlate with a relatively smaller body size. Animals of this genus are typically colored as to blend in with their backgrounds, presenting mostly black or brown or gray coloring on their dorsal sides. The ventral side tends to be more variable in coloration, though in species such as ''H. underwoodi'', the dorsal coat can have patterns such as white bands extending across the hind quarters. Ventral coat coloration is often some combination of white, gray, or brown. Hair on these animals ranges from short to relatively long, and the hairs are generally fine and soft. It is thought that these characteristics are advantageous for the animal to remove dirt from its coat during the grooming process. A very distinctive feature of the ''Heterogeomys'' genus is the large incisors that protrude from the mouth, even when the mouth is closed. This is a characteristic that is shared across all rodents, but is particularly prominent in gophers. These enlarged incisors serve two purposes. The first, as is the general trend in animals, tooth shape is adapted to the individual's diet. Secondly, since the teeth protrude out of the mouth, the ''Heterogeomys'' can use its teeth to dig, while preventing dirt from entering its oral cavity. Pocket gophers also possess valvular ears, which can be closed to prevent the entry of soil into the auditory canal while digging.Behavior
Burrowing
''Heterogeomys'' are solitary creatures except during their breeding seasons. In the breeding seasons though, multiple individuals can occupy the same burrow. During the non-breeding times of year, only one ''Heterogeomys'' occupies a tunnel system at a given time. These tunnels are subdivided into areas for their nest, the food store, and a separate tunnel for excrement. In the ''H. cherriei'', tunnels have an average height of 12.8 cm, and can be up to almost 200 m in length. ''Heterogeomys'' are primarily active during the morning and afternoon, and are mainly found inside their burrows.Feeding Habits
On the whole, pocket Gophers tend to have a higher daily caloric intake than most rodent species. This is due to the added energy expenditures necessary to move around underground, and is a contributing factor to how destructive these animals can be towards crops that are cultivated by humans. ''Heterogeomys'' are herbivores, who feed on corn, grass roots, cassava, rice, and sugar cane.Interspecies Interactions
Trapping
Documents from before the Spanish settlement of Mexico report different methods on the catching and preparing of pocket gophers for food. Due to the extended length of time that trapping has been a part of the community, it should come as no surprise that the practice of trapping has gained cultural significance in southeastern Mexico. Unfortunately, the nature of the traps used in the past by the Mayan's is a mystery now, but present methods of gopher trapping can be observed. Two popular snares used in the modern day both make use of a spring, a snare, and a tension line. One trap is set off by a gopher running into a tension line, and another by a gopher chewing through a baited line.Pest Control
''Heterogeomys'' often feed off of bananas and other crops that are being cultivated by humans. These pocket gophers are capable of being quite destructive towards these crops as well, capable of causing up to a 50% loss in crops. Because of the significant losses, people have poured much effort into trying to control Pocket Gopher populations. In Costa Rica, several methods of pest control have been pursued, but many have been abandoned in searching for the ideal solution. Mongooses have been introduced into the ''Heterogeomys'' habitats in hopes of culling their numbers, food has been poisoned and left out for the ''Heterogeomys'' to find, or the spreading of toxic chemicals. Unfortunately, the latter two options pose not only are harmful to the ''Heterogeomys'', but to humans as well. Since there is no antidote available in Costa Rica for some of the chemicals used in pest control, so the use of these chemicals must be carefully managed.Cophylogeny
Evidence suggests that a close relationship has existed between pocket gophers and chewing lice for significant periods of time. It has been posited that this relationship is due to the fact that both of these creatures habits make them quite well suited for parallel evolution. By tunneling underground, these gophers are creating a slightly more palatable environment than had existed before, and this environment would become populated with organisms. These organisms would become gradually adapted, not only to the tunnel environment, but likely also to the gophers who created the tunnels. In the case of chewing lice, this would mean attaching onto, and becoming well suited to overcoming the hosts defense systems, but without causing so much harm as to kill the host. Since pocket gophers are so solitary, any contact that they have with other animals is likely to be with other pocket gophers of their same species. In this way, a certain initial type of lice could be passed on almost exclusively in one species of pocket gopher for generations and generations, producing a new species of louse, specific to one species of pocket gopher.References
{{Taxonbar, from=Q27996196 Rodent genera Rodents of Central America Rodents of North America Taxa named by Clinton Hart Merriam Taxonomy articles created by Polbot