Background
Madison, as written in Federalist No. 10, had decided why factions cannot be controlled by pure democracy: Madison then theorized the use of a republic, and the first form of a republic must be evaluated. The Roman Republic was a republic, but it was heavily monopolized at the top, almost aristocratic, in a sense, as it cared only about the rich. The poor were treated as outcasts, not as members of society, and were also so politically immature that could not even talk at public meetings. That was not viewed the same way in the Madisonian republic in which everyone is treated equally and has a say.Summary
Madison defines what ''republic'' means and states three rules that must apply to be considered a republic: # What is the foundation of its establishment? Only the people of the nation and no one else would make the decision of who rules the government. # What are the sources of its power? The person who is chosen by the people should not break any rules or abuse their power. # Who has the authority to make future changes? When someone is chosen to rule the country, they should be in that position for only a certain amount of time unless the people of the nation feel that it is best to impeach them. This corresponds to the Madisonian republic, which means the system of government where the citizens of the state elect representatives to make decisions for them using three powerful branches: the executive, the judicial, and the legislative. From early in the Constitutional Convention, Madison held the position that the national government should be federal because if it were more extensive in relation to the states, that would increase the "probability of duration, happiness and good order". It was not initially clear how the new government would interact with the states, and Madison was in favor of a federal form, "a political system in which at least two territorial levels of government share sovereign constitutional authority over their respective division and joint share of law-making powers; differently put, neither the federal government nor the relevant federative entities may unilaterally alter one another's powers without a process of constitutional amendment in which both levels of government participate." Other alternatives included a confederacy as under theReferences
External links