free-space path loss

In telecommunications, the free-space path loss (FSPL) (also known as free-space loss, FSL) is the attenuation of radio energy between the feedpoints of two antennas that results from the combination of the receiving antenna's capture area plus the obstacle-free, line-of-sight (LoS) path through free space (usually air). The "Standard Definitions of Terms for Antennas", IEEE Std 145-1993, defines free-space loss as "The loss between two isotropic radiators in free space, expressed as a power ratio." It does not include any power loss in the antennas themselves due to imperfections such as resistance. Free-space loss increases with the square of distance between the antennas because the radio waves spread out by the inverse square law and decreases with the square of the wavelength of the radio waves. The FSPL is rarely used standalone, but rather as a part of the Friis transmission formula, which includes the gain of antennas. It is a factor that must be included in the power link budget of a radio communication system, to ensure that sufficient radio power reaches the receiver such that the transmitted signal is received intelligibly.

Free-space path loss formula

The free-space path loss (FSPL) formula derives from the Friis transmission formula. This states that in a radio system consisting of a transmitting antenna transmitting radio waves to a receiving antenna, the ratio of radio wave power received $P_r$ to the power transmitted $P_t$ is:
:$\frac = D_t D_r \left( \frac \right)^2$
where
*$\ D_t$ is the directivity of the transmitting antenna
*$\ D_r$ is the directivity of the receiving antenna
*$\ \lambda$ is the signal wavelength
*$\ d$ is the distance between the antennas
The distance between the antennas $d$ must be large enough that the antennas are in the far field of each other $\ d\gg\lambda$.
The free-space path loss is the loss factor in this equation that is due to distance and wavelength, or in other words, the ratio of power transmitted to power received assuming the antennas are isotropic and have no directivity ($D_t = D_r = 1$):
$\begin \mbox = \left ( \frac \lambda \right )^2 \end$

Since the frequency of a radio wave $f$ is equal to the speed of light $c$ divided by the wavelength, the path loss can also be written in terms of frequency:
$\begin \mbox = \left(\right)^2 \end$

Beside the assumption that the antennas are lossless, this formula assumes that the polarization of the antennas is the same, that there are no multipath effects, and that the radio wave path is sufficiently far away from obstructions that it acts as if it is in free space. This last restriction requires an ellipsoidal area around the line of sight out to 0.6 of the Fresnel zone be clear of obstructions. The Fresnel zone increases in diameter with the wavelength of the radio waves. Often the concept of free space path loss is applied to radio systems that don't completely meet these requirements, but these imperfections can be accounted for by small constant power loss factors that can be included in the link budget.

Influence of distance and frequency

The free-space loss increases with the distance between the antennas and decreases with the wavelength of the radio waves due to these factors:, Section 1.8
*Intensity ($I$) – the power density of the radio waves decreases with the square of distance from the transmitting antenna due to spreading of the electromagnetic energy in space according to the inverse square law
* Antenna capture area ($A_\text$) – the amount of power the receiving antenna captures from the radiation field is proportional to a factor called the ''antenna aperture'' or antenna capture area, which increases with the square of wavelength. Since this factor is not related to the radio wave path but comes from the receiving antenna, the term "free-space path loss" is a little misleading.
*Directivity of receiving antenna- while the above formulas are correct, the presence of Directivities Dt and Dr builds the wrong intuition in the FSPL Friis transmission formula. The formula seems to say that "free space path loss" increases with frequency in vacuum, which is misleading. The frequency dependence of path loss does not come from free space propagation, but rather from receiving antenna capture area frequency dependence. As frequency increases, the directivity of an antenna of a given physical size will increase. In order to keep receiver antenna directivity constant in the formula, the antenna size must be reduced, and a smaller size antenna results in less power being received as it is able to capture less power with a smaller area. In other words, the path loss increases with frequency because the antenna size is reduced to keep directivity constant in the formula, and has nothing to do with propagation in vacuum.
*Directivity of transmitting antenna - the directivity of transmitting antenna does not have the same role as directivity of receiving antenna. The difference is that the receiving antenna is receiving the power from free space, and hence captures less power as it becomes smaller. The transmitting antenna does not transmit less power as it becomes smaller (for example half wave dipole), because it is receiving its RF power from a generator or source, and if the source is 1 Watt or Pt, the antenna will transmit all of it (assuming ideal efficiency and VSWR for simplicity).

* System Loss Factor (L) : Miscellaneous loses or system loses (L=>1) are usually due to transmission line attenuation, filter loses, and antenna loses in communication system. A value of L = 1 indicates no loss in the system hardware.

Derivation

The radio waves from the transmitting antenna spread out in a spherical wavefront. The amount of power passing through any sphere centered on the transmitting antenna is equal. The surface area of a sphere of radius $d$ is $4\pi d^2$. Thus the intensity or power density of the radiation in any particular direction from the antenna is inversely proportional to the square of distance
:$I \propto$
(The term $4\pi d^2$ means the surface of a sphere, which has a radius $d$. Please remember, that $d$ here has a meaning of 'distance' between the two antennas, and does not mean the diameter of the sphere (as notation usually used in mathematics).)
For an isotropic antenna which radiates equal power in all directions, the power density is evenly distributed over the surface of a sphere centered on the antenna
:$I = \qquad \qquad \qquad \text$
The amount of power the receiving antenna receives from this radiation field is
:$P_r = A_\textI \qquad \qquad \qquad \text$
The factor $A_\text$, called the ''effective area'' or ''aperture'' of the receiving antenna, which has the units of area, can be thought of as the amount of area perpendicular to the direction of the radio waves from which the receiving antenna captures energy. Since the linear dimensions of an antenna scale with the wavelength $\lambda$, the cross sectional area of an antenna and thus the aperture scales with the square of wavelength $\lambda^2$. The effective area of an isotropic antenna (for a derivation of this see antenna aperture article) is
:$A_\text =$
Combining the above (1) and (2), for isotropic antennas
:$P_r = \Big(\Big)\Big(\Big)$
:$\text = = \Big(\Big)^2$

Free-space path loss in decibels

A convenient way to express FSPL is in terms of decibels (dB):
:$\begin \operatorname(\text) &= 10\log_\left(\left(\frac\right)^2\right) \\ &= 20\log_\left(\frac\right) \\ &= 20\log_(d) + 20\log_(f) + 20\log_\left(\frac\right) \\ &= 20\log_(d) + 20\log_(f) -147.55, \end$
using SI units of meters for $d$, hertz (s⁻¹) for $f$, and meters per second (m⋅s⁻¹) for $c$, (where c=299 792 458 m/s in vacuum, ≈ 300 000 km/s)

For typical radio applications, it is common to find $d$ measured in kilometers and $f$ in gigahertz, in which case the FSPL equation becomes
:$\operatorname(\text) = 20\log_(d_) + 20\log_(f_) + 92.45,$
an increase of 240 dB, because the units increase by factors of and respectively, so:
:$20\log_(10^) + 20\log_(10^) = 240.$

(The constants differ in the second decimal digit when the speed of light is approximated by 300 000 km/s. Whether one uses 92.4, 92.44 or 92.45 dB, the result will be OK as the average measurement instruments cannot provide more accurate results anyway. A logarithmic scale is introduced to see the important differences (i.e. order of magnitudes), so in engineering practice dB results are rounded)

See also

* Computation of radiowave attenuation in the atmosphere
* Friis transmission equation
* Radio propagation model
* ITU-R P.525
* Link budget
* Two-ray ground reflection model
* Free-space optical communication

References

Further reading

*
Derivation of the dB version of the Path Loss EquationPath loss
Pages for free space and real world – includes free-space loss calculator
*Hilt, A. “Throughput Estimation of K-zone Gbps Radio Links Operating in the E-band”'', Journal of Microelectronics, Electronic Components and Materials, Vol.52, No.1, pp.29-39'', 2022. DOI:10.33180/InfMIDEM2022.104

shows Fresnel zone and its calculation

{{Radio frequency propagation models

Telecommunications engineering
Radio frequency propagation model