Flipped SU(5)

The Flipped SU(5) model is a grand unified theory (GUT) first contemplated by Stephen Barr in 1982, and by Dimitri Nanopoulos and others in 1984. Ignatios Antoniadis, John Ellis, John Hagelin, and Dimitri Nanopoulos developed the supersymmetric flipped SU(5), derived from the deeper-level superstring.

Some current efforts to explain the theoretical underpinnings for observed neutrino masses are being developed in the context of supersymmetric flipped .

Flipped is not a fully unified model, because the factor of the Standard Model gauge group is within the factor of the GUT group. The addition of states below ''M''x in this model, while solving certain threshold correction issues in string theory, makes the model merely descriptive, rather than predictive.Barcow, Timothy ''et al.'', ''Electroweak symmetry breaking and new physics at the TeV scale''
World Scientific, 1996, 194.

The model

The flipped model states that the gauge group is:

:

Fermions form three families, each consisting of the representations

: for the lepton doublet, L, and the up quarks ;
: for the quark doublet, Q, the down quark, and the right-handed neutrino, ;
: for the charged leptons, .

This assignment includes three right-handed neutrinos, which have never been observed, but are often postulated to explain the lightness of the observed neutrinos and neutrino oscillations. There is also a and/or called the Higgs fields which acquire a VEV, yielding the spontaneous symmetry breaking

:

The representations transform under this subgroup as the reducible representation as follows:

:$\bar_\to (\bar,1)_\oplus (1,2)_$ (u^c and l)
:$10_\to (3,2)_\oplus (\bar,1)_\oplus (1,1)_0$ (q, d^c and ν^c)
:$1_\to (1,1)_1$ (e^c)
:$24_0\to (8,1)_0\oplus (1,3)_0\oplus (1,1)_0\oplus (3,2)_\oplus (\bar,2)_$.

Comparison with the standard SU(5)

The name "flipped" arose in comparison to the "standard" Georgi–Glashow model, in which and quark are respectively assigned to the and representation. In comparison with the standard , the flipped can accomplish the spontaneous symmetry breaking using Higgs fields of dimension 10, while the standard requires both a 5- and 45-dimensional Higgs.

The sign convention for varies from article/book to article.

The hypercharge Y/2 is a linear combination (sum) of the following:

:$\begin&0&0&0&0\\0&&0&0&0\\0&0&&0&0\\0&0&0&-&0\\0&0&0&0&-\end\in \text(5), \qquad \chi/5.$

There are also the additional fields and containing the electroweak Higgs doublets.

Calling the representations for example, and is purely a physicist's convention, not a mathematician's convention, where representations are either labelled by Young tableaux or Dynkin diagrams with numbers on their vertices, and is a standard used by GUT
theorists.

Since the homotopy group

:$\pi_2\left(\frac\right)=0$

this model does not predict monopoles. See 't Hooft–Polyakov monopole.

Minimal supersymmetric flipped SU(5)

Spacetime

The superspace extension of Minkowski spacetime

Spatial symmetry

SUSY over Minkowski spacetime with R-symmetry

Gauge symmetry group

Global internal symmetry

(matter parity) not related to in any way for this particular model

Vector superfields

Those associated with the gauge symmetry

Chiral superfields

As complex representations:

Superpotential

A generic invariant renormalizable superpotential is a (complex) invariant cubic polynomial in the superfields which has an -charge of 2. It is a linear combination of the following terms:

$\begin S&S\\ S 10_H \overline_H & S 10_H^ \overline_\\ 10_H 10_H H_d&\epsilon_10_H^10_H^ H_d^\\ \overline_H\overline_H H_u&\epsilon^\overline_\overline_H_\\ H_d 10 10&\epsilon_H_d^10_i^10_j^\\ H_d \bar 1 &H_d^\alpha \bar_ 1_j\\ H_u 10 \bar&H_ 10_i^ \bar_\\ \overline_H 10 \phi&\overline_ 10_i^ \phi_j\\ \end$

The second column expands each term in index notation (neglecting the proper normalization coefficient). and are the generation indices. The coupling has coefficients which are symmetric in and .

In those models without the optional sterile neutrinos, we add the nonrenormalizable couplings instead.

$\begin (\overline_H 10)(\overline_H 10)&\overline_10^_i \overline_ 10^_j\\ \overline_H 10 \overline_H 10&\overline_10^_i\overline_10^_j \end$

These couplings do break the R-symmetry.

See also

* Flipped SO(10)

References

{{DEFAULTSORT:Flipped Su(5)
Grand Unified Theory