HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

The Fitting lemma, named after the mathematician
Hans Fitting Hans Fitting (13 November 1906 in München-Gladbach (now Mönchengladbach) – 15 June 1938 in Königsberg (now Kaliningrad)) was a mathematician who worked in group theory. He proved Fitting's theorem and Fitting's lemma, and defined the Fitting ...
, is a basic statement in abstract algebra. Suppose ''M'' is a module over some ring. If ''M'' is
indecomposable Indecomposability or indecomposable may refer to any of several subjects in mathematics: * Indecomposable module, in algebra * Indecomposable distribution, in probability * Indecomposable continuum, in topology * Indecomposability (intuitionist ...
and has finite
length Length is a measure of distance. In the International System of Quantities, length is a quantity with dimension distance. In most systems of measurement a base unit for length is chosen, from which all other units are derived. In the Interna ...
, then every endomorphism of ''M'' is either an
automorphism In mathematics, an automorphism is an isomorphism from a mathematical object to itself. It is, in some sense, a symmetry of the object, and a way of mapping the object to itself while preserving all of its structure. The set of all automorphisms ...
or nilpotent. As an immediate consequence, we see that the endomorphism ring of every finite-length indecomposable module is local. A version of Fitting's lemma is often used in the
representation theory of groups Representation may refer to: Law and politics *Representation (politics), political activities undertaken by elected representatives, as well as other theories ** Representative democracy, type of democracy in which elected officials represent a ...
. This is in fact a special case of the version above, since every ''K''-linear representation of a group ''G'' can be viewed as a module over the group algebra ''KG''.


Proof

To prove Fitting's lemma, we take an endomorphism ''f'' of ''M'' and consider the following two sequences of submodules: * The first sequence is the descending sequence \mathrm(f) \supseteq \mathrm(f^2) \supseteq \mathrm(f^3) \ldots, * the second sequence is the ascending sequence \mathrm(f) \subseteq \mathrm(f^2) \subseteq \mathrm(f^3) \ldots Because M has finite length, both of these sequences must eventually stabilize, so there is some n with \mathrm(f^n) = \mathrm(f^) for all n^\prime \geq n, and some m with \mathrm(f^m) = \mathrm(f^) for all m^\prime \geq m. Let now k = \max\, and note that by construction \mathrm (f^) = \mathrm (f^) and \mathrm (f^) = \mathrm (f^). We claim that \mathrm\left(f^k\right) \cap \mathrm\left(f^k\right) = 0. Indeed, every x\in \mathrm\left(f^k\right) \cap \mathrm\left(f^k\right) satisfies x=f^k\left(y\right) for some y\in M but also f^k\left(x\right)=0, so that 0=f^k\left(x\right)=f^k\left(f^k\left(y\right)\right)=f^\left(y\right), therefore y\in\mathrm\left(f^\right)=\mathrm\left(f^k\right) and thus x=f^k\left(y\right)=0. Moreover, \mathrm\left(f^k\right) + \mathrm\left(f^k\right) = M: for every x\in M, there exists some y\in M such that f^k\left(x\right)=f^\left(y\right) (since f^k\left(x\right)\in\mathrm\left(f^k\right)=\mathrm\left(f^\right)), and thus f^k\left(x-f^k\left(y\right)\right) = f^k\left(x\right)-f^\left(y\right)=0, so that x-f^k\left(y\right)\in\mathrm\left(f^k\right) and thus x\in \mathrm\left(f^k\right)+f^k\left(y\right)\subseteq \mathrm\left(f^k\right) + \mathrm\left(f^k\right). Consequently, M is the
direct sum The direct sum is an operation between structures in abstract algebra, a branch of mathematics. It is defined differently, but analogously, for different kinds of structures. To see how the direct sum is used in abstract algebra, consider a more ...
of \mathrm(f^k) and \mathrm(f^k). (This statement is also known as the ''Fitting decomposition theorem''.) Because M is indecomposable, one of those two summands must be equal to M, and the other must be the trivial submodule. Depending on which of the two summands is zero, we find that f is either bijective or nilpotent.Jacobson (2009), p. 113–114.


Notes


References

* {{DEFAULTSORT:Fitting Lemma Module theory Lemmas in algebra