Application
EAC can be used in the following scenarios: #Assessing alternative projects of unequal lives (where only the costs are relevant) in order to address any built-in bias favouring the longer-term investment. #Determining the optimum economic life of an asset, through charting the change in EAC that may occur due to the fluctuation of operating costs and salvage values over time. #Assessing whether leasing an asset would be more economical than purchasing it. #Assessing whether increased maintenance costs will economically change the useful life of an asset. #Calculating how much should be invested in an asset in order to achieve a desired result (i.e., purchasing a storage tank with a 20-year life, as opposed to one with a 5-year life, in order to achieve a similar EAC). #Comparing to estimated annual cost savings, in order to determine whether it makes economic sense to invest. #Estimating the cost savings required to justify the purchase of new equipment. #Determining the cost of continuing with existing equipment. #Where an asset undergoes a major overhaul, and the cost is not fully reflected in salvage values, to calculate the optimum life (i.e., lowest EAC) of holding on to the asset.A practical example
A manager must decide on which machine to purchase, assuming an annual interest rate of 5%:demonstrated at The conclusion is to invest in machine B since it has a lower EAC.Canadian context with capital cost allowance
Such analysis can also be carried out on an after-tax basis, and extensive work has been undertaken in Canada for investment appraisal of assets subject to its capital cost allowance regime for computing depreciation for income tax purposes. It is subject to a three-part calculation: #Determination of the after-tax NPV of the investment #Calculation of the after-tax NPV of the operating cost stream #Applying a sinking fund amortization factor to the after-tax amount of any salvage value. In mathematical notation, for assets subject to the general half-year rule of CCA calculation, this is expressed as: where: :''A'' = Capital recovery (amortization) factor :''F'' = Sinking fund amortization factor :''I'' = Investment :''S'' = Estimated salvage value : = Operating expense stream :''d'' = CCA rate per year for tax purposes :''t'' = rate of taxation :''n'' = number of years :''i'' =See also
* Capital budgeting * Depreciation * Net present valueReferences
Further reading
* * * * {{cite journal, last1= Kauffmann, first1= Paul, last2= Howard, first2= Ed, last3= Yao, first3= Jason, last4= Harbinson, first4= Drew, last5= Brooks, first5= Newell, last6= Williams, first6= Richard, last7= Gurganus, first7= Christine, title= Criteria for Fleet Management: Identification of Optimal Disposal Points using Equivalent Uniform Annual Cost, journal= Transportation Research Record, issn= 0361-1981, url= http://docs.trb.org/prp/12-2637.pdf, doi= 10.3141/2292-20, date= 2012, volume= 2292, pages= 171{{endash178, publisher= Transportation Research Board, archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20170517102110/http://docs.trb.org/prp/12-2637.pdf, archive-date= May 17, 2017, url-status= dead, access-date= February 11, 2015External links