HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Devine v Quebec (AG)'', 9882 S.C.R. 790 is a leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on the constitutional protection of
minority language A minority language is a language spoken by a minority of the population of a territory. Such people are termed linguistic minorities or language minorities. With a total number of 196 sovereign states recognized internationally (as of 2019) a ...
rights.


Background

Allan Singer was a Montreal printer who mostly served anglophone clientele. For over 30 years, his store front had a sign advertising his store that was written in English only. He was charged under the ''
Charter of the French Language The ''Charter of the French Language'' (french: link=no, La charte de la langue française), also known in English as Bill 101, Law 101 (''french: link=no, Loi 101''), or Quebec French Preference Law, is a law in the Provinces and territories of ...
'' for having an English sign. Singer and several others brought an action to strike down provisions of the French Language Charter and the ''Regulation respecting the language of commerce and business'', which required commercial signs to be in French only, as being laws that were ''
ultra vires ('beyond the powers') is a Latin phrase used in law to describe an act which requires legal authority but is done without it. Its opposite, an act done under proper authority, is ('within the powers'). Acts that are may equivalently be termed ...
'' the province, and in violation of his freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter and section 3 of the Quebec Charter, right to equality under 15(1) of the Canadian Charter, and his right against discrimination under section 10 of the Quebec Charter.


Issues

The issues before the Supreme Court were: # whether the Language Charter was valid provincial law # whether the provisions prohibiting English signs violated the right to freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the '' Canadian Charter'' # and if so, could it be saved under section 1 of the ''Canadian Charter''.


Judgment of the Court

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court held that the Language Charter concerned a valid provincial matter but it violated Singer's freedom of expression under section 2(b) of the ''Canadian Charter'' as it prohibited the use of English. The Court rejected Singer's argument that the law restricted mobility as protected under the Charter. The law only established conditions for doing business but did not restrict anyone's comings or goings. On the federalism issue, the Court rejected Singer's argument that the law constituted Criminal law under the Constitution Act, 1867. Though there was a prohibition and a penalty, the Act as a whole it constituted a regulatory scheme directed as the linguistic mode of certain commercial activities, and did not resemble any traditional criminal matters based on morality or public order.


See also

*
List of Supreme Court of Canada cases (Dickson Court) This is a chronological list of notable cases decided by the Supreme Court of Canada The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC; french: Cour suprême du Canada, CSC) is the Supreme court, highest court in the Court system of Canada, judicial system of ...


Notes

sometimes called ''Allan Singer Ltd. v. Quebec Attorney General''


External links

* * Article critical of the decisio
"The implications of accommodation", Policy Options, May 1990
Canadian freedom of expression case law Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms case law Supreme Court of Canada cases Bilingualism in Canada 1988 in Canadian case law Quebec language policy Language case law Language conflict in Canada {{canada-law-stub