Double Writing (Petty) on:
[Wikipedia]
[Google]
[Amazon]
''A Declaration Concerning the newly invented Art of Double Writing'' was a pamphlet of 6 leaves, written by Sir William Petty (1623-1687) and first published in 1648. It contained information regarding his invention of the "Art of Double Writing", especially a claim for patent rights. It did not contain any information on what his invention exactly was.
William Petty was educated in France and in Holland, and returned to England in 1646, to finish his education in the medical science at Oxford University. He was quite active in many fields of scientific discovery and inventions and developed an instrument for double-writing in 1647. It is mentioned in his first printed publication, titled ''The Advice to Hartlib'' (1647).
Petty went to Ireland in 1652 to assist Oliver Cromwell in his Cromwellian conquest of Ireland, conquest and arranged the Down Survey, a cadastral survey of Ireland, between 1654 and 1656.
It would take twelve years, until Petty's next publication appeared in print: the ''Proceedings between Sankey and Petty.''
In 1662 Petty was one of the founding members of the Royal Society.
the text in EEBO-TCP
an
as a further expression of his claim on patent rights. The text of this broadside was in much the same terms as the Preface to Petty's ''The Advice to Hartlib'' of 1647/8; it had "an Extract of the Ordinance of Parliament dated 6. Martii. 1647." attached, in which Petty's claim on a patent for 14 years was confirmed.
Part II
Machine and Mind), p. 180f. Although it is sometimes thought that the invention was a kind of typewriter, the most probable explanation is that it was some kind of jointed or flexible framework for handwriting with two pens at once.
Connor (2014) -
Technological Object: Polygraph
' on website of Literature Technology Media (LTM) Research Group at University of Cambridge, Faculty of English; accessed 2018-01-11 (the same in
this page
. states that the invention of Petty was an adaptation of the pantograph of Scheiner. The Hartlib Papers hold an anonymous and undated copy of a text about "the nature and uses of the double writing instrument".''The nature & uses of the double writing Instrument''
On 22 December 1647 William Petty sent a petition to the House of Lords, asking for a patent right. The petition contains a certificate that Petty was able to produce two copies of the first chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews in 15 minutes.. See also
Memo & Testimonial on Double Writing dated 1647-12-22
The patent was passed on 6 March 1648 "under the Great Seal (…) for Seventeen Years".John Rushworth, , "Proceedings in Parliament: February 28th - April 1st, 1648", in ''Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 7, 1647-48'' (London, 1721), pp. 1010-1045. i
British History Online
(accessed 23 September 2017). Samuel Hartlib called Petty's invention the ''Instrumentum Pettii.''In a letter from Hartlib to Robert Boyle of 10 augustus 1658. Se
''The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle etc.''
see also Fitzmaurice 1895, pp. 10/11, 13. Petty dedicated his 'instrument' to Robert Boyle.
British History Online
(accessed 2018-01-10; the heading of chapter XXIV also has "1647"). The text of 6 March reads as follows: "The House (of Commons) was informed of one Mr. Petty, who hath found out an Art of Double Writing, to write Two Copies at once, and that he desired a Patent for Teaching of the same, under the Great Seal of England for certain Years; and the House hereupon Ordered, That a Patent should pass under the Great Seal to the said Mr. Petty for Seventeen Years, to teach his Art of double Writing."
ORA-record
with a link to a downloadable pdf (access-date 2018-01-21). places the Double Writing instrument of Petty in the context of a broader interest in building devices for double writing in the 17th century, especially in the 1650s. He claims to unravel the complex history of proposals for such instruments for the first time.
p. 215. Wren complained that a model of his own invention, in a still imperfect condition, had been seen by chance by someone, who had reproduced it. The failure of the reproduction of his unfinished invention had made it impossible for him to give to the world his own perfected instrument for multiplying copies of writing. Wren does not mention a name, but the history of Petty's invention leads Bevan "to suspect that he may have been the person whom Wren accuses of this dishonorable act. From what we know of Petty's insensibility to strict honesty, where he saw any chance of furthering his own interests, we cannot say that he was incapable of such an action."Bevan 1894, p. 23/4.
'':s:en:Bevan - Sir William Petty (1894), Sir William Petty: A Study in English Economic Literature''. Published as ''Publications of the American Economic Association'', vol. 9, no. 4 (August 1894). Wikisource.
*
* in two volumes.
*
Wikisource, with scans of the original document and transcription.
*
Double Writing
' in 'The Hartlib Papers'. {{DEFAULTSORT:Double Writing, Declaration concerning (William Petty) Books by William Petty 1648 books
Bibliographical information
6 p. full title: ''A Declaration Concerning the newly invented Art of Double Writing. Wherein are expressed the reasons of the Authors proceedings in procuring a Priviledge for the same : As also of the Time, Manner, and Price, of the discovery of the said Art, and of the Instruments belonging thereunto. For the satisfaction of all that desire to be partakers of the great benefit of the same, before they adventure anything towards the reward thereof. Whereunto is annexed a copie of an Ordinance of both Houses of Parliament, approving the feasibility and great use of the said invention, and allowing a Priviledge to the Inventor, for the sole benefit thereof for 14 years, upon the penalty of one hundred pounds.'' Already in the Preface of his first printed publication, ''The Advice to Hartlib'' (first published 1647), Petty had written that there was "invented an Instrument of small Bulke and price, easily made, and very durable, whereby any Man, even at the first sight and handling, may write two resembling Copies of the same thing at once, as serviceably and as fast (allowing two lines upon each page for setting the Instruments) as by the ordinary way." He then suggested that the returns of that invention might perhaps be enough to pay for the "Ergastula literaria" – the literary work-houses – that he wanted to establish. Apart from the six page pamphlet on "Double Writing", published early in 1648, in April 1648 Petty also published a single leafed broadside, titled ''Double Writing,''Keynes 1971: nr. 3; Wings: P 1921; ESTC: R210729. See alsothe text in EEBO-TCP
an
as a further expression of his claim on patent rights. The text of this broadside was in much the same terms as the Preface to Petty's ''The Advice to Hartlib'' of 1647/8; it had "an Extract of the Ordinance of Parliament dated 6. Martii. 1647." attached, in which Petty's claim on a patent for 14 years was confirmed.
Background
The instrument for double writing was one of the first attempts of Petty to make money with an invention. Already early in 1603, a Duchy of Bavaria, Bavarian Jesuit priest, Christoph Scheiner (1573-1650) had invented a pantograph, a mechanical instrument, in which a pencil was connected to a stylus by means of a parallelogram. The pantograph was intended to create a copy of an image. Scheiner's invention was described in his ''Pantographice seu Ars delineandi res quaslibet per parallelogrammum lineare seu cavum'' (1631).Scheiner 1631: . For Scheiner's pantograph see also (1990) – The Science of Art.Part II
Machine and Mind), p. 180f. Although it is sometimes thought that the invention was a kind of typewriter, the most probable explanation is that it was some kind of jointed or flexible framework for handwriting with two pens at once.
Connor (2014) -
Technological Object: Polygraph
' on website of Literature Technology Media (LTM) Research Group at University of Cambridge, Faculty of English; accessed 2018-01-11 (the same in
this page
. states that the invention of Petty was an adaptation of the pantograph of Scheiner. The Hartlib Papers hold an anonymous and undated copy of a text about "the nature and uses of the double writing instrument".''The nature & uses of the double writing Instrument''
On 22 December 1647 William Petty sent a petition to the House of Lords, asking for a patent right. The petition contains a certificate that Petty was able to produce two copies of the first chapter of the Epistle to the Hebrews in 15 minutes.. See also
Memo & Testimonial on Double Writing dated 1647-12-22
The patent was passed on 6 March 1648 "under the Great Seal (…) for Seventeen Years".John Rushworth, , "Proceedings in Parliament: February 28th - April 1st, 1648", in ''Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 7, 1647-48'' (London, 1721), pp. 1010-1045. i
British History Online
(accessed 23 September 2017). Samuel Hartlib called Petty's invention the ''Instrumentum Pettii.''In a letter from Hartlib to Robert Boyle of 10 augustus 1658. Se
''The Works of the Honourable Robert Boyle etc.''
see also Fitzmaurice 1895, pp. 10/11, 13. Petty dedicated his 'instrument' to Robert Boyle.
Contents
In ''Double Writing'' not a word is said about the invention itself. Petty first explains that he thinks it is unnecessary to enlarge upon the importance of his invention. He next explains in broad terms how he has come to ask a patent on it. And finally he describes how much the use of the instrument will cost. The last page of the document holds an ordinance of the House of Commons of England, House of Commons and the House of Lords, dated 6 March 1647, which affirms the claim of a patent, "for the term of 14 yeares".See also: John Rushworth, , "Proceedings in Parliament: February 28th - April 1st, 1648", in ''Historical Collections of Private Passages of State: Volume 7, 1647-48'' (London, 1721), pp. 1010-1045. iBritish History Online
(accessed 2018-01-10; the heading of chapter XXIV also has "1647"). The text of 6 March reads as follows: "The House (of Commons) was informed of one Mr. Petty, who hath found out an Art of Double Writing, to write Two Copies at once, and that he desired a Patent for Teaching of the same, under the Great Seal of England for certain Years; and the House hereupon Ordered, That a Patent should pass under the Great Seal to the said Mr. Petty for Seventeen Years, to teach his Art of double Writing."
Critical reception
Petty's activities in the field of inventions are often mentioned by later scholars. But concerning his instrument for double writing in general not much is added to the little, that is known about it from the ''Double Writing'' pamphlet. Fitzmaurice mentions Petty's collaboration with a John Holland of Deptford for three years. This partnership was to be confined to the development of Petty's inventions, "more particularly the double writing instrument, a machine for printing several columns at once, a scheme for making a great bridge without any support on the river over which it stands, and other undertakings of the same kind." Fitzmaurice did not find any record of what the partnership effected. William PooleW. Poole (2017?) - 'Seventeenth-Century ‘Double Writing’ Schemes, and a 1676 Letter in the Phonetic Script and Real Character of John Wilkins.' To be published in the Notes and Records of the Royal Society. SeeORA-record
with a link to a downloadable pdf (access-date 2018-01-21). places the Double Writing instrument of Petty in the context of a broader interest in building devices for double writing in the 17th century, especially in the 1650s. He claims to unravel the complex history of proposals for such instruments for the first time.
Wren's Instrument for Double Writing
A couple of years later Christopher Wren also referred to a double writing machine in a letter.Wren's Parentalia (London 1750)p. 215. Wren complained that a model of his own invention, in a still imperfect condition, had been seen by chance by someone, who had reproduced it. The failure of the reproduction of his unfinished invention had made it impossible for him to give to the world his own perfected instrument for multiplying copies of writing. Wren does not mention a name, but the history of Petty's invention leads Bevan "to suspect that he may have been the person whom Wren accuses of this dishonorable act. From what we know of Petty's insensibility to strict honesty, where he saw any chance of furthering his own interests, we cannot say that he was incapable of such an action."Bevan 1894, p. 23/4.
References
Bibliography
* Bevan, Wilson Lloyd (1894). '':s:en:Bevan - Sir William Petty (1894), Sir William Petty: A Study in English Economic Literature''. Published as ''Publications of the American Economic Association'', vol. 9, no. 4 (August 1894). Wikisource.
*
* in two volumes.
*
External links
* '':en:s:Double Writing (Petty 1648), Double Writing'' in Wikisource, with scans of the original document and transcription.
* Double Writing
' in 'The Hartlib Papers'. {{DEFAULTSORT:Double Writing, Declaration concerning (William Petty) Books by William Petty 1648 books