HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

In mathematics, especially algebraic geometry, the decomposition theorem of Beilinson, Bernstein and Deligne or BBD decomposition theorem is a set of results concerning the cohomology of
algebraic varieties Algebraic varieties are the central objects of study in algebraic geometry, a sub-field of mathematics. Classically, an algebraic variety is defined as the set of solutions of a system of polynomial equations over the real or complex numbers. ...
. It was originally conjectured by Gelfand and MacPherson.


Statement


Decomposition for smooth proper maps

The first case of the decomposition theorem arises via the hard Lefschetz theorem which gives isomorphisms, for a smooth proper map f: X \to Y of relative dimension ''d'' between two projective varieties :- \cup \eta^i : R^f_* (\mathbb Q) \stackrel \cong \to R^ f_*(\mathbb Q). Here \eta is the fundamental class of a
hyperplane section In mathematics, a hyperplane section of a subset ''X'' of projective space P''n'' is the intersection of ''X'' with some hyperplane ''H''. In other words, we look at the subset ''X'H'' of those elements ''x'' of ''X'' that satisfy the single line ...
, f_* is the
direct image In mathematics, the direct image functor is a construction in sheaf theory that generalizes the global sections functor to the relative case. It is of fundamental importance in topology and algebraic geometry. Given a sheaf ''F'' defined on a topolo ...
(pushforward) and R^n f_* is the ''n''-th
derived functor In mathematics, certain functors may be ''derived'' to obtain other functors closely related to the original ones. This operation, while fairly abstract, unifies a number of constructions throughout mathematics. Motivation It was noted in vari ...
of the direct image. This derived functor measures the ''n''-th cohomologies of f^(U), for U \subset Y. In fact, the particular case when ''Y'' is a point, amounts to the isomorphism :- \cup \eta^i : H^ (X, \mathbb Q) \stackrel \cong \to H^ (X, \mathbb Q). This hard Lefschetz isomorphism induces canonical isomorphisms :Rf_* (\mathbb Q) \stackrel \cong \to \bigoplus_^ R^ f_*(\mathbb Q) d-i Moreover, the sheaves R^ f_* \mathbb Q appearing in this decomposition are
local system In mathematics, a local system (or a system of local coefficients) on a topological space ''X'' is a tool from algebraic topology which interpolates between cohomology with coefficients in a fixed abelian group ''A'', and general sheaf cohomology ...
s, i.e., locally free sheaves of Q-vector spaces, which are moreover semisimple, i.e., a direct sum of local systems without nontrivial local subsystems.


Decomposition for proper maps

The decomposition theorem generalizes this fact to the case of a proper, but not necessarily smooth map f: X \to Y between varieties. In a nutshell, the results above remain true when the notion of local systems is replaced by
perverse sheaves The mathematical term perverse sheaves refers to a certain abelian category associated to a topological space ''X'', which may be a real or complex manifold, or a more general topologically stratified space, usually singular. This concept was intro ...
. The hard Lefschetz theorem above takes the following form:. NB: To be precise, the reference is for the decomposition. there is an isomorphism in the
derived category In mathematics, the derived category ''D''(''A'') of an abelian category ''A'' is a construction of homological algebra introduced to refine and in a certain sense to simplify the theory of derived functors defined on ''A''. The construction pr ...
of sheaves on ''Y'': :^p H^ (Rf_* \mathbb Q) \cong ^p H^ (Rf_* \mathbb Q), where Rf_* is the total derived functor of f_* and ^p H^i is the ''i''-th truncation with respect to the ''perverse''
t-structure In the branch of mathematics called homological algebra, a ''t''-structure is a way to axiomatize the properties of an abelian subcategory of a derived category. A ''t''-structure on \mathcal consists of two subcategories (\mathcal^, \mathcal^) ...
. Moreover, there is an isomorphism :Rf_* IC_X^\bullet \cong \bigoplus_i ^p H^i (Rf_* IC_X^\bullet) i where the summands are semi-simple perverse-sheaves, meaning they are direct sums of push-forwards of intersection cohomology sheaves. If ''X'' is not smooth, then the above results remain true when \mathbb Q dim X/math> is replaced by the
intersection cohomology In topology, a branch of mathematics, intersection homology is an analogue of singular homology especially well-suited for the study of singular spaces, discovered by Mark Goresky and Robert MacPherson in the fall of 1974 and developed by them ov ...
complex IC.


Proofs

The decomposition theorem was first proved by Beilinson, Bernstein, and Deligne. Their proof is based on the usage of weights on l-adic sheaves in positive characteristic. A different proof using
mixed Hodge module In mathematics, mixed Hodge modules are the culmination of Hodge theory, mixed Hodge structures, intersection cohomology, and the decomposition theorem yielding a coherent framework for discussing variations of degenerating mixed Hodge structures ...
s was given by Saito. A more geometric proof, based on the notion of semismall maps was given by de Cataldo and Migliorini. For semismall maps, the decomposition theorem also applies to
Chow motive In algebraic geometry, motives (or sometimes motifs, following French usage) is a theory proposed by Alexander Grothendieck in the 1960s to unify the vast array of similarly behaved cohomology theories such as singular cohomology, de Rham coho ...
s.


Applications of the theorem


Cohomology of a Rational Lefschetz Pencil

Consider a rational morphism f:X \rightarrow \mathbb^1 from a smooth quasi-projective variety given by _1(x):f_2(x)/math>. If we set the vanishing locus of f_1,f_2 as Y then there is an induced morphism \tilde = Bl_Y(X) \to \mathbb^1. We can compute the cohomology of X from the intersection cohomology of Bl_Y(X) and subtracting off the cohomology from the blowup along Y. This can be done using the perverse spectral sequence : E_2^ = H^l(\mathbb^1; ^\mathfrak\mathcal^m(IC_^\bullet(\mathbb)) \Rightarrow IH^(\tilde;\mathbb) \cong H^(X;\mathbb)


Local invariant cycle theorem

Let f : X \to Y be a
proper morphism In algebraic geometry, a proper morphism between schemes is an analog of a proper map between complex analytic spaces. Some authors call a proper variety over a field ''k'' a complete variety. For example, every projective variety over a field ...
between complex algebraic varieties such that X is smooth. Also, let y_0 be a regular value of f that is in an open ball ''B'' centered at y. Then the restriction map :\operatorname^*(f^(y), \mathbb) = \operatorname^*(f^(B), \mathbb) \to \operatorname^*(f^(y_0), \mathbb)^ is surjective, where \pi_ is the fundamental group of the intersection of B with the set of regular values of ''f''.


References


Survey Articles

* * *


Pedagogical References

* {{Citation , first1=Ryoshi , last1=Hotta , first2=Kiyoshi , last2=Takeuchi , first3=Toshiyuki , last3=Tanisaki , title= D-Modules, Perverse Sheaves, and Representation Theory


Further reading


BBDG decomposition theorem
at nLab Algebraic geometry