Publications
Books
*Hample, D ''Arguing: Exchanging Reasons Face to Face'' Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005. . *Benoit, W.L., Hample, D., & Benoit, P. (Eds.) (1992). ''Readings in Argumentation''. Berlin: Foris.Journal articles
*Hample, D., Warner, B., & Norton, H. (2006). The effects of arguing expectations and predispositions on perceptions of argument quality and playfulness. ''Argumentation and Advocacy'', 43(1), 1-13. *Hample, D., Thompson-Hayes, M., Wallenfelsz, K., Wallenfelsz, P., & Knapp, C. (2005). "Face-to-face arguing is an emotional experience: Triangulating methodologies and early findings." ''Argumentation and Advocacy'', 42, 74-93. *Cortes, C., Larson, C., & Hample, D. (2005). Relations among message design logic, interpersonal construct differentiation, and sex for Mexican and U.S. nationals. ''Journal of Intercultural Communication Research'', 34, 108-118. *Hample, D. (2000). Cognitive editing of arguments and reasons for requests: Evidence from think-aloud protocols. ''Argumentation and Advocacy'', 37, 98-108. *Hample, D. (1999). The life space of personalized conflicts. ''Communication Yearbook'', 22, 171-208. *Hample, D., Benoit, P. J., Houston, J., Purifoy, G., VanHyfte, V., & Wardell'', C. (1999). Naive theories of argument: Avoiding interpersonal arguments or cutting them short. Argumentation'' and Advocacy, 35, 130-139. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J. M. (1998). On the etiology of the rebuff phenomenon: Why are persuasive messages less polite after rebuffs? ''Communication Studies'', 49, 305-321. *Dallinger, J.M., & Hample, D. (1995). Personalizing and managing conflict. ''International Journal of Conflict Management'', 6, 287-289. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1995). A Lewinian perspective on taking conflict personally: Revision, refinement, and validation of the instrument. ''Communication Quarterly'', 43, 297-319. *Dallinger, J. M., & Hample, D. (1994). The effects of gender on compliance gaining strategy endorsement and suppression. ''Communication Reports'', 7, 43-49. *Hample, D. (1992). Writing mindlessly. ''Communication Monographs'', 59, 315-323. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1992). The use of multiple goals in cognitive editing of arguments. ''Argumentation and Advocacy'', 28, 109-122. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1991). Message design logic, goal structure, interpersonal construct differentiation, and situation. In D. W. Parson (Ed.), ''Argument in Controversy'' (pp. 188–192). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association. *Hample, D. (1990). Debate as a civic act. ''Applying Research to the Classroom'', 8, 1-2. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1990). Arguers as editors. ''Argumentation'', 4, 153-169. *Dallinger, J.M., & Hample, D. (1988). Supervisor accessibility and job characteristics. ''Communication Research Reports'', 5, 4-9. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1987). Self-monitoring and the cognitive editing of arguments. ''Central States Speech Journal'', 38, 152-165. *Hample, D., & Dallinger, J.M. (1987). Cognitive editing of argument strategies. ''Human Communication Research'', 14, 123-144. *Hample, D. (1987). The role of the unconscious in nonverbal information processing. ''Semiotica'', 67, 211-231. *Hample, D. (1986). Argumentation and the unconscious. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 23, 82-95. *Hample, D. (1986). Logic, conscious and unconscious. ''Western Journal of Speech Communication'', 50, 24-40. *Hample, D. (1985). Refinements on the cognitive model of argument. ''Western Journal of Speech Communication'', 49, 267-285. *Hample, D. (1985). Teaching the cognitive context of argument. ''Communication Education'', 34, 196-204. *Hample, D. (1985). A third perspective on argument. ''Philosophy and Rhetoric'', 18, 1-22. *Hample, D. (1984). On the use of self-reports. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 20, 140-153. *Hample, D. (1982). Dual coding, reasoning and fallacies. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 19, 59-78. *Hample, D. (1981). Forensics research in the 1980s. ''Forensic'', 66, 20-25. *Thompson, W.N., Hample, D., Hunt, S., & Pruett, R. (1981). What Is CEDA Debate? ''Forensic'', 66, 4-9. *Hample, D. (1981). The cognitive context of argument. ''Western Journal of Speech Communication'', 45, 148-158. *Hample, D. (1980). A cognitive view of argument. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 17, 151-158. *Hample, D. (1980). Purposes and effects of lying. ''Southern Speech Communication Journal'', 46, 33-47. *Hample, D. (1980). Motives in law: An adaptation of legal realism. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 15, 156-168. *Blimling, G. S., & Hample, D. (1979). Structuring the peer environment in residence halls to increase academic performance in average-ability students. ''Journal of College Student Personnel'', 20, 310-316. *Hample, D. (1979). Predicting belief and belief change using a cognitive theory of argument and evidence. ''Communication Monographs'', 46, 142-146. *Hample, D. (1978). Are attitudes arguable? ''Journal of Value Inquiry'', 12, 311-312. *Hample, D. (1978). Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims. ''Communication Monographs'', 45, 219-228. *Hample, D., & Hample, J. (1978). Evidence credibility. ''Debate Issues'', 12, 4-5. *Hample, D. (1977). Testing a model of value argument and evidence. ''Communication Monographs'', 14, 106-120. *Hample, D. (1977). The Toulmin model and the syllogism. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 14, 1-9. *Wenzel, J.W., & Hample, D. (1975). Categories and dimensions of value propositions: Exploratory studies. ''Journal of the American Forensic Association'', 11, 121-130.Other publications
He has also published over two dozen chapters in specialized books and encyclopedias, and over 50 conference presentations.References
*"Argument as Cognition: A Putnamian Criticism of Dale Hample’s Cognitive Conception of Argument" in ''Argumentation'' Springer Netherlands, Volume 18, Number 3 331-348 / January, 200External links