Chow's Lemma
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

Chow's lemma, named after
Wei-Liang Chow Chow Wei-Liang (; October 1, 1911, Shanghai – August 10, 1995, Baltimore) was a Chinese mathematician and stamp collector born in Shanghai, known for his work in algebraic geometry. Biography Chow was a student in the US, graduating from the ...
, is one of the foundational results in
algebraic geometry Algebraic geometry is a branch of mathematics, classically studying zeros of multivariate polynomials. Modern algebraic geometry is based on the use of abstract algebraic techniques, mainly from commutative algebra, for solving geometrical ...
. It roughly says that a
proper morphism In algebraic geometry, a proper morphism between schemes is an analog of a proper map between complex analytic spaces. Some authors call a proper variety over a field ''k'' a complete variety. For example, every projective variety over a field '' ...
is fairly close to being a
projective morphism This is a glossary of algebraic geometry. See also glossary of commutative algebra, glossary of classical algebraic geometry, and glossary of ring theory. For the number-theoretic applications, see glossary of arithmetic and Diophantine geometry. ...
. More precisely, a version of it states the following: :If X is a scheme that is proper over a
noetherian In mathematics, the adjective Noetherian is used to describe Category_theory#Categories.2C_objects.2C_and_morphisms, objects that satisfy an ascending chain condition, ascending or descending chain condition on certain kinds of subobjects, meaning t ...
base S, then there exists a projective S-scheme X' and a surjective S-morphism f: X' \to X that induces an isomorphism f^(U) \simeq U for some dense open U\subseteq X.


Proof

The proof here is a standard one.


Reduction to the case of X irreducible

We can first reduce to the case where X is irreducible. To start, X is noetherian since it is of finite type over a noetherian base. Therefore it has finitely many irreducible components X_i, and we claim that for each X_i there is an irreducible proper S-scheme Y_i so that Y_i\to X has set-theoretic image X_i and is an isomorphism on the open dense subset X_i\setminus \cup_ X_j of X_i. To see this, define Y_i to be the scheme-theoretic image of the open immersion :X\setminus \cup_ X_j \to X. Since X\setminus \cup_ X_j is set-theoretically noetherian for each i, the map X\setminus \cup_ X_j\to X is quasi-compact and we may compute this scheme-theoretic image affine-locally on X, immediately proving the two claims. If we can produce for each Y_i a projective S-scheme Y_i' as in the statement of the theorem, then we can take X' to be the disjoint union \coprod Y_i' and f to be the composition \coprod Y_i' \to \coprod Y_i\to X: this map is projective, and an isomorphism over a dense open set of X, while \coprod Y_i' is a projective S-scheme since it is a finite union of projective S-schemes. Since each Y_i is proper over S, we've completed the reduction to the case X irreducible.


X can be covered by finitely many quasi-projective S-schemes

Next, we will show that X can be covered by a finite number of open subsets U_i so that each U_i is quasi-projective over S. To do this, we may by quasi-compactness first cover S by finitely many affine opens S_j, and then cover the preimage of each S_j in X by finitely many affine opens X_ each with a closed immersion in to \mathbb^n_ since X\to S is of finite type and therefore quasi-compact. Composing this map with the open immersions \mathbb^n_\to \mathbb^n_ and \mathbb^n_ \to \mathbb^n_S, we see that each X_ is a closed subscheme of an open subscheme of \mathbb^n_S. As \mathbb^n_S is noetherian, every closed subscheme of an open subscheme is also an open subscheme of a closed subscheme, and therefore each X_ is quasi-projective over S.


Construction of X' and f:X'\to X

Now suppose \ is a finite open cover of X by quasi-projective S-schemes, with \phi_i:U_i\to P_i an open immersion in to a projective S-scheme. Set U=\cap_i U_i, which is nonempty as X is irreducible. The restrictions of the \phi_i to U define a morphism :\phi: U \to P = P_1 \times_S \cdots \times_S P_n so that U\to U_i\to P_i = U\stackrel P \stackrel P_i, where U\to U_i is the canonical injection and p_i:P\to P_i is the projection. Letting j:U\to X denote the canonical open immersion, we define \psi=(j,\phi)_S: U\to X\times_S P, which we claim is an immersion. To see this, note that this morphism can be factored as the graph morphism U\to U\times_S P (which is a closed immersion as P\to S is separated) followed by the open immersion U\times_S P\to X\times_S P; as X\times_S P is noetherian, we can apply the same logic as before to see that we can swap the order of the open and closed immersions. Now let X' be the scheme-theoretic image of \psi, and factor \psi as : \psi:U\stackrel X'\stackrel X\times_S P where \psi' is an open immersion and h is a closed immersion. Let q_1:X\times_S P\to X and q_2:X\times_S P\to P be the canonical projections. Set :f:X'\stackrel X\times_S P \stackrel X, :g:X'\stackrel X\times_S P \stackrel P. We will show that X' and f satisfy the conclusion of the theorem.


Verification of the claimed properties of X' and f

To show f is surjective, we first note that it is proper and therefore closed. As its image contains the dense open set U\subset X, we see that f must be surjective. It is also straightforward to see that f induces an isomorphism on U: we may just combine the facts that f^(U)=h^(U\times_S P) and \psi is an isomorphism on to its image, as \psi factors as the composition of a closed immersion followed by an open immersion U\to U\times_S P \to X\times_S P. It remains to show that X' is projective over S. We will do this by showing that g:X'\to P is an immersion. We define the following four families of open subschemes: : V_i = \phi_i(U_i)\subset P_i : W_i = p_i^(V_i)\subset P : U_i' = f^(U_i)\subset X' : U_i'' = g^(W_i)\subset X'. As the U_i cover X, the U_i' cover X', and we wish to show that the U_i'' also cover X'. We will do this by showing that U_i'\subset U_i'' for all i. It suffices to show that p_i\circ g, _:U_i'\to P_i is equal to \phi_i\circ f, _:U_i'\to P_i as a map of topological spaces. Replacing U_i' by its reduction, which has the same underlying topological space, we have that the two morphisms (U_i')_\to P_i are both extensions of the underlying map of topological space U\to U_i\to P_i, so by the reduced-to-separated lemma they must be equal as U is topologically dense in U_i. Therefore U_i'\subset U_i'' for all i and the claim is proven. The upshot is that the W_i cover g(X'), and we can check that g is an immersion by checking that g, _:U_i''\to W_i is an immersion for all i. For this, consider the morphism : u_i:W_i\stackrel V_i\stackrel U_i\to X. Since X\to S is separated, the graph morphism \Gamma_:W_i\to X\times_S W_i is a closed immersion and the graph T_i=\Gamma_(W_i) is a closed subscheme of X\times_S W_i; if we show that U\to X\times_S W_i factors through this graph (where we consider U\subset X' via our observation that f is an isomorphism over f^(U) from earlier), then the map from U_i'' must also factor through this graph by construction of the scheme-theoretic image. Since the restriction of q_2 to T_i is an isomorphism onto W_i, the restriction of g to U_i'' will be an immersion into W_i, and our claim will be proven. Let v_i be the canonical injection U\subset X' \to X\times_S W_i; we have to show that there is a morphism w_i:U\subset X'\to W_i so that v_i=\Gamma_\circ w_i. By the definition of the fiber product, it suffices to prove that q_1\circ v_i= u_i\circ q_2\circ v_i, or by identifying U\subset X and U\subset X', that q_1\circ\psi=u_i\circ q_2\circ \psi. But q_1\circ\psi = j and q_2\circ\psi=\phi, so the desired conclusion follows from the definition of \phi:U\to P and g is an immersion. Since X'\to S is proper, any S-morphism out of X' is closed, and thus g:X'\to P is a closed immersion, so X' is projective. \blacksquare


Additional statements

In the statement of Chow's lemma, if X is reduced, irreducible, or integral, we can assume that the same holds for X'. If both X and X' are irreducible, then f: X' \to X is a
birational In mathematics, birational geometry is a field of algebraic geometry in which the goal is to determine when two algebraic varieties are isomorphic outside lower-dimensional subsets. This amounts to studying mappings that are given by rational fu ...
morphism.


References


Bibliography

* *{{Hartshorne AG Theorems in algebraic geometry Zhou, Weiliang